Game Thread NBA PLAY-IN - PELICANS @ CLIPPERS - APRIL 15, 2022 - FRIDAY - 7:00 PM (PDT) TNT

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Because they literally have up their pick when it was 8th in the lottery. Not the Lakers pick is. It should've been that the Blazers get the NOP 1st and if it doesn't convey them they get the Lakers pick unless it's top 4.

So the Pelicans should have traded a pick that wasn't expected to be theirs unless the Lakers completely fell apart...

Which at the time of the trade didn't appear to be the better of the two picks.

Makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
I think teams are letting the Pelicans in because they don't want us to have two picks haha
 
So the Pelicans should have traded a pick that wasn't expected to be theirs unless the Lakers completely fell apart...

Which at the time of the trade didn't appear to be the better of the two picks.

Makes sense.

We could have written it so that we got the better of the two picks.
 
We could have written it so that we got the better of the two picks.

Why would the Pelicans do that?? They could end up losing a top 4 pick.
 
I bet you 4 guys who started the season as teammates matching up in a win or go home in the post season (either a 9/10 game in the play in, a second play in game or game seven in the playoffs) has either never happened or is extremely rare.
With both on different teams
 
Posts like this are so funny.
It should've been that the Blazers get the NOP 1st and if it doesn't convey them they get the Lakers pick unless it's top 4.

So "It should have been" like this is the way we should have forced them to take CJ. Of course nobody wants to think the the Pels could have just said "NO Fuck you. Live with CJ and his contract and go suck eggs" but i know that doesn't really fit the narrative around here.

It's not just this poster either. Seems like a number of people here feel they know exactly what they should have got and what they would have forced New Orleans to take.
 
So the Pelicans should have traded a pick that wasn't expected to be theirs unless the Lakers completely fell apart...

Which at the time of the trade didn't appear to be the better of the two picks.

Makes sense.
It's called covering your bases if your Cronin. And I'm saying it should've backed up the Pelicans pick instead of the MIL 1st.
 
Posts like this are so funny.


So "It should have been" like this is the way we should have forced them to take CJ. Of course nobody wants to think the the Pels could have just said "NO Fuck you. Live with CJ and his contract and go suck eggs" but i know that doesn't really fit the narrative around here.

It's not just this poster either. Seems like a number of people here feel they know exactly what they should have got and what they would have forced New Orleans to take.
And posts like this are fucking hilarious.

New Orleans desperately wanted CJ, the Lakers pick would've been an unlikely condition, and Cronin admitted he left value on the table. But you're sitting here pretending like he got the most value out of the trade even when he admitted he didn't.

"Forced New Orleans to take"? What in the world are you talking about. How about "negotiated better"?
 
Last edited:
S

Don't ruffle feathers? He traded CJ McCollum who was a fan favorite, which angered a lot of people, then he tanked the season, which angered a lot of people (perhaps including Bill Schonely). He also made some trades that angered a lot of people.
I should have said internally. Sorry...mind you its just a feeling I get and could be way way off. He's survived inside the mothership for 14 years and he mentioned at his introductory conference he tries to stay out of the way.
I got the feeling most in here were glad CJ was traded, just not what we got in return. It seemed to me also that fewer people in here didn't want to tank versus, tank baby tank.
We are going to find out soon enough if he's earned the job.
 
And posts like this are fucking hilarious.

New Orleans desperately wanted CJ, the Lakers pick would've been an unlikely condition, and Cronin admitted he left value on the table. But you're sitting here pretending like he got the most value out of the trade even when he admitted he didn't.

"Forced New Orleabs to take"? What in the world are you talking about. How about "negotiated better"?
Followed by yet more assumptions. Sure thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
I'm not saying Joe couldn't have done better. That's because i simply don't know if he could have done better or if he tried to get more?
On the flip side of that is I'm not willing to assume i know exactly what both parties involved were willing and not willing to do in the trade and why.
Sitting here spewing assumptions like i do know would be ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
I should have said internally. Sorry...mind you its just a feeling I get and could be way way off. He's survived inside the mothership for 14 years and he mentioned at his introductory conference he tries to stay out of the way.
I got the feeling most in here were glad CJ was traded, just not what we got in return. It seemed to me also that fewer people in here didn't want to tank versus, tank baby tank.
We are going to find out soon enough if he's earned the job.
See now this post at least is objective and it is reasonable in it's approach.
 
This is so Blazers. Why Cronin didn't have contingencies built in like getting the Lakers pick that is owed to NOP if they didn't get the Pels pick is staggering. Pels sure put a lot of contingencies on the picks.
Same, that is how I look at it too.
 
Why would the Pelicans do that?? They could end up losing a top 4 pick.

Portland gets the better of the Pels pick or the Lakers pick, both picks top-4 protected. If neither conveys then the Blazers get the Lakers 2024 pick, top-4 protected
 
So what do people think the odds are the Clippers win tonight. I'm guessing from reading (just) this page everyone is certain it's the Pels to lose? I still think the Clippers can win this, obviously far from a sure thing, but I still have them at 55/45 or better to beat the Pels just due to experience and home court and also CJ JUST had a hot game, he almost always lays an egg after a hot game.
 
The options for CJ at the deadline had been reported as Gallinari+filler+pick from Atlanta, Powell+Kleber/(maybe Hardaway?)+distant first from Dallas and the New Orleans deal. I can absolutely guarantee that this board would have been going bezerk if we had kept CJ past the deadline, and the same posters blasting Cronin now would be blasting him if he had turned down all offers and hadn't made a move.

Cronin likely took a gamble that the pick would convey this year (and as of the time of this post, of course, it still might). If it doesn't convey, is it not still a gamble worth taking at the time? The Milwaukee future pick may not be as shiny of an asset, but it still is an asset that can be utilized. Hell, that pick might be used to acquire Grant anyway (so really there would be no major difference on our end).

We can argue that Cronin should have negotiated for better terms after this season, but what if NOP simply says no. New Orleans was certainly interested in CJ, but I've never gotten the impression that they HAD to have him. NOP could have easily said, "meh, if you like those other deals better, we're fine." I'd still prefer Hart, the Milwaukee pick, and additional cap flexibility (along with the seconds, etc.) to the other offers.
Thank you
 
Just want to say that I don't think Cronin's job should depend on whether Pels win or not. He already made what looks like a bad decision to have such a lousy compensation if this pick didn't convey. If Clips bail him out, that doesn't change any evaluation of Cronin in my view. BTW I was pretty happy with the trade until i realized all the contingencies on the pick and the fact it then slid back so far.
 
At least I like hearing Trae talking about the advantage of experience in playoff games.
 
Just want to say that I don't think Cronin's job should depend on whether Pels win or not. He already made what looks like a bad decision to have such a lousy compensation if this pick didn't convey. If Clips bail him out, that doesn't change any evaluation of Cronin in my view. BTW I was pretty happy with the trade until i realized all the contingencies on the pick and the fact it then slid back so far.
I couldn't agree more, the fact that it hangs in the balance like this along with just how terrible the Clippers trade was should make it a lock that we have a new GM soon.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top