NBA players: "No deal"

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Shooter

Unanimously Great
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
5,484
Likes
152
Points
63
Now we know why the average NBA player goes broke within 4 years of retiring. These clowns have now officially rejected the NBA's last and best offer, mainly because they resent being given an "ultimatum."

The practical effect of this will probably be a cancellation of the season, which means they will all lose a year's salary--money that they will never regain before the end of their careers. This is throwing money out the window, which of course most NBA players are very good at.
 
Who will make it rain for the strippers now?
 
I think you meant "NBA Player Reps: 'No Deal'". It doesn't appear anyone bothered to ask the players what they thought about it.

Or the fans.
 
I think you meant "NBA Player Reps: 'No Deal'". It doesn't appear anyone bothered to ask the players what they thought about it.

Or the fans.

be interesting if there is a backlash from the players on this
 
The good news is that yet another year will pass without LeBron James winning a title.
 
obama%20killing%20the%20golden%20goose.jpg
 
A record number of Americans (48 mill) are on food stamps, and millions more are unemployed, but the NBA players say they're getting a raw deal . . . Derek Fisher and Billy Hunter are fools, and the entire player's union is living in a fool's paradise.

If this season is cancelled, I may rethink my commitment to the NBA. I'm sick and tired of spoiled egotistical millionaire jocks who have no grasp on reality.
 
The Beavers play West Alabama tonight and Hofstra on Wednesday, in Corvallis. They'll be televised against Texas on the 19th and either NC State or Vanderbilt on the 21st. I need a weekend game to take my girls -- Looks like Montana on Sunday the 4th might work.

It takes me 20 minutes to get to Gill Colliseum. I was a devoted fan during the Lonnie Shelton, Steve Johnson, Charlie Sitton, Lester Conner, AC Green and Gary Payton years, and had season tickets during much of that time. I saw every single home game Payton played in. I think I could rekindle some of that spirit, settle in and support the young guys who play there now just fine.

Just sayin'.
 
It will be interesting to see if both sides REALLY are willing to go the distance here. The NFL managed to avoid the whole antitrust question by cutting a deal.

Even if they players were to win in the end (and that "win" would presumably include hundreds of millions or even billions in treble damage-enhanced dollars) I don't see how they win in the long run. Teams would fold and revenues would plummet (since getting there would probably kill at least another NBA season).

I also am interested to see how players can make it through this year with no paychecks. The richest players should be in a good spot, but those who were making a million or less... I can see how they might be scrambling to pay their bills over the next year or two.

Ed O.
 
The first 3, I didn't even realize were still in the league!
 
The first 3, I didn't even realize were still in the league!

It's sort of sad... they have the least to lose, don't they? They didn't have to make real sacrifice in their careers to get tens of millions of dollars in contract money, but they're willing to sacrifice today's young players up at the altar of "fairness".

Ed O.
 
I also am interested to see how players can make it through this year with no paychecks. The richest players should be in a good spot, but those who were making a million or less... I can see how they might be scrambling to pay their bills over the next year or two.
Hard to imagine how someone making a million dollars a year would have to worry about his bills for a year . . . but you're right. These guys live so high on the hog it's unbelievable. Amare Stoudemire apparently rents a penthouse apt. in Manhattan for $37,000 a month . . .
 
It's sort of sad... they have the least to lose, don't they? They didn't have to make real sacrifice in their careers to get tens of millions of dollars in contract money, but they're willing to sacrifice today's young players up at the altar of "fairness".

Ed O.
To the excellent point.
 
I hope some of these tools have to file bankruptcy.

This is essentially alienating themselves from the average NBA fan. The 99%'er if you will. Good job of giving a black eye to your following you self-righteous turd-heads.
 
The first 3, I didn't even realize were still in the league!

I was going to say that the only one I recognize in that picture was Fisher.
 
I was going to say that the only one I recognize in that picture was Fisher.

I'm glad to hear someone else say that. When all those players were walking up to the podium I only recognized a handful.

It's like when you have "gym friends". You only see them at your zumba class but then you run into them at the grocery store. You know they look really familiar but can't figure out who they are because they're in street clothes.
 
From one Laker Great to another...?

KareemAdbul-Jabbar said:
The NBA’s House of Cards – Don’t Bet Against the House.

I think the lockout has come to its most crucial moments. The Players Association has fought long and hard for its position but they have run out of negotiating room. The players are faced with the fact that the owners have all the cards at this point. I liken it to bluffing at the card table at the casino. It ...works for a while but the owners are the “house” and they control all the cards. The only option the players have would be to go and play in Europe or Asia for one quarter to one third of the salaries they are now making, therefore The NBA is the best platform for them to exhibit their wares. For that reason the players are stuck in a very poor negotiating posture.

Because the League has expanded to 30 teams developing many more jobs the players should understand that The NBA won’t be able to maintain its cohesion if all of the teams don’t have the potential to make money and/or win the NBA Championship. The smaller market teams have been losing money steadily for the past few years and until their situation gets better there will be a downward spiral for the health of the entire league. The big market teams such as LA, Chicago, NYC, Boston and Miami will do well but the other teams that have small cable markets don’t do well and are operating mainly in the red. The owners will have to work that situation out amongst themselves but they won’t be able to start until they have a deal with the Players Association that won’t interfere with whatever the owners decide to work out in terms of revenue sharing. So I would advise the Players Association to take the 50/50 deal and to be grateful for the opportunities they have.

Regarding the other main contention about the mid level cap, I think mid-level salaries will grow as the league continues to grow, but the players must exhibit some patience. I couldn’t have done my job without the role players that made it possible for me to shine and that will always be the case no matter how many superstars end up being on a team (see Miami). However in any organization the top performers are always the ones that are making more than the role players and I don’t think that template will change anytime soon. If mid-level players want to make more money they have to accept the fact that they have to consistently perform at a high level. If they do that, then they should be rewarded based on their performance.

Maybe the players should give it some more thought before they decertify their union....
https://www.facebook.com/kaj
 
The good news is that yet another year will pass without LeBron James winning a title.

Now that's what I call making lemonade out of the lemons! Excellent point deserving a rep.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top