- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,058
- Likes
- 10,854
- Points
- 113
So any trade that benefits the team financially is dismissed as only for economic reasons no matter how it matters on the court? That is ridiculous.
Ridiculous? Meet jlprk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So any trade that benefits the team financially is dismissed as only for economic reasons no matter how it matters on the court? That is ridiculous.
So any trade that benefits the team financially is dismissed as only for economic reasons no matter how it matters on the court? That is ridiculous.
We were over the LT. Getting anything but cap relief for Vonleh, unless he showed himself too good to give up on, would be FOOLISH.
We should all pitch in a nickel and send the poor guy flowers. He won't fuck up this summer like he has almost every other summer and trade deadline.
I only looked at the first 2 summers before I got tired of looking. We sure could use a 6-6 SF.
In 2013 for Thomas Robinson, he paid 2015 #37 (#40 was Josh Richardson, 6-6 SF, Miami Heat starter for the last 2 years) and 2017 #45 (#45 was Dillon Brooks, 6-6 SF, already the Memphis starter as a rookie).
This is a distraction. I did say he fucked up most summers, which I'm unwilling to research an hour to back up, but much more important is the main theme...that the team has not improved because he is a very inactive GM in transactions. Nothing ever changes and fans are getting bored. It's the same old "Let it bake" philosophy. Only economics, not a desire to improve the roster, forces the guy to get off his ass, and even then, always at the last minute in a self-created emergency so he can look like a hero bailing out his own errors.
He's made trades, and good ones. How'd we get Nurk?
Harkless was our starting SF. There aren't a whole lot of SFs in the league available who are better. A sad fact.
All indications we got from the news are that the Blazers were in the discussion to get Melo from the Knicks. The deal never looked that good for us, considering we'd have to take back an Evan Turner sized salary for a player who probably doesn't belong in the league anymore (at least not at anything above vet minimum).
Sometimes the deals you don't make are the best.
There is such a drought at small forward position that I think our best bet on getting a fix will be the draft. Of course you rarely get a quick fix in the draft but if I were to choose between a young player with potential to do something and an average wing like Wilson Chandler or Ersan Ilyasova, it's simple.
Wait, are you saying that @Mediocre Man is trying to get with Zach Collins' girl?You're a fucking hater.
Wait, are you saying that @Mediocre Man is trying to get with Zach Collins' girl?![]()
Oh, OK...that's a different story.No, he just literally hates.
His “plan” of overpaying for bad assets regardless has gotten us further from a title than it has helped...He has done the opposite of what the successful rebuilding gms have done. He has saddled the team with tons of bad debt and dead money and he traded away young players without receiving assets in return.
Has Olshey made some blunders, Yes. Is he completely off the rails? I don't believe so. He has, as stated, two more years.
giving a GM five years to rebuild a team after some of the foundations are cut away (Aldridge leaving, Matthews getting injured) is reasonable.
No. Because the only players on the roster anybody wants are the players we're unwilling (rightly!) to trade. This is an abysmal position to be in. If there were even 3 players outside of Dame/CJ/Nurk/Collins that had value, then you could argue that the financials are ideal. But that's not the case - we are almost entirely reliant on Nurk/Collins becoming All-Star-level talents in order for the team to improve.
NO did gamble on internal improvement of any one of the guys, but that didn't happen. I don't think it's anyone's fault but the players' and the coach's.
There were several players allegedly available (some of which you mentioned) but like many teams, would have needed cap space to re-sign them and the Blazers won't have any cap space.
Harkless was our starting SF. There aren't a whole lot of SFs in the league available who are better. A sad fact.
All indications we got from the news are that the Blazers were in the discussion to get Melo from the Knicks. The deal never looked that good for us...Sometimes the deals you don't make are the best.
The problem is when you do sell you can end up with Gerald Henderson and Noah Vonleh. You don't know that selling is the right move.
The Afflalo trade wasn't economics.
I would love to use the TPE at the draft to take on a contract with a 1st round pick as compensation. Then we could either package our pick with that one to move up and hopefully find our SF or just take the best SF at each spot and hope one of them turns into a starter.
Why 2 more years? Because he says so? He has done little with his first 4 (6?) years.