Mr. Robot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2017
- Messages
- 4,482
- Likes
- 4,114
- Points
- 113
fuck off, once for Collins and twice for NurkicI would go all in on Gordon if he were available. Including trading Collins or Nurkic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fuck off, once for Collins and twice for NurkicI would go all in on Gordon if he were available. Including trading Collins or Nurkic.
I would go all in on Gordon if he were available. Including trading Collins or Nurkic.
fuck off, once for Collins and twice for Nurkic
I'd easily do Collins for Gordon. He's a crazy athletic 4 that can stretch the floor and start right away. Collins is a couple seasons away from being a legit starter.
I'm not looking at this in a vaccuum. I think with Dame/CJ, and one of our bigs (either Nurk or Zach), Gordon will be terrific. He only has Fournier now to keep defenses honest. Get him more open looks from 3, and make him our finisher on the P&R, and I think he projects out like an Amare with a somewhat decent 3pt shot.No thanks! Other than dunking, what is it that Gordon does so well? He's a bit of a tweener. ORL tried him at SF last season and that a disaster. So, they moved him back to PF, where he is a below average rebounder for his position, a below average 3-point shooter and a net negative defender.
Sure, he's only 22, but he's going to command big bucks this summer. Gordon is clearly a better offensive player than Zach Collins at this point, but 20-year old Collins is already a better defender and a better 3-point shooter. Gordon is going to get paid like a No. 2 option, but he's at best a No.3 or No. 4 option on a contender. Collins is locked up on a cheap rookie contract for several more years. I'd rather keep him than get stuck in a match or loose this summer situation with Gordon.
BNM
I'm not looking at this in a vaccuum. I think with Dame/CJ, and one of our bigs (either Nurk or Zach), Gordon will be terrific. He only has Fournier now to keep defenses honest. Get him more open looks from 3, and make him our finisher on the P&R, and I think he projects out like an Amare with a somewhat decent 3pt shot.
Last year, he had Fournier, Ibaka and Vucevic to keep defenses honest, and he sucked.
The Trail Blazers are looking to make a splash and find a third star to pair with Damian Lillard and C.J. McCollum. Portland has kept tabs on DeAndre Jordan and is also trying to upgrade at small forward.
Portland is also shopping forward Noah Vonleh, league sources told The Athletic.
https://theathletic.com/229016/2018...ba-trade-deadline-possibilities-team-by-team/
No it won't. The only thing that could help the fast break is a new coach or a new PG...and it might take both in order for us to be successful on the break.Adding Gordon would really help the fast break.
The Trail Blazers are looking to make a splash and find a third star to pair with Damian Lillard and C.J. McCollum. Portland has kept tabs on DeAndre Jordan and is also trying to upgrade at small forward.
Portland is also shopping forward Noah Vonleh, league sources told The Athletic.
https://theathletic.com/229016/2018...ba-trade-deadline-possibilities-team-by-team/
One can only hope!sounds like speculation to me, but i think we're primed to replace our depth in the front court with another high-profile player.
in two years time, Nurk will be the second best player on the teamAt the very least, if the opinion around the league is that we're looking for a 3rd star to pair with Dame & CJ, that means the general consensus is Nurk's value is going down. He may not attract huge offers from other teams.
I disagree... I think Nurk has star potential, he is just 2-3 years away from consistency and Blazers need players to bring it every night while Dame/CJ in their prime. It’s a timing thing more than knock on Nurks talent.At the very least, if the opinion around the league is that we're looking for a 3rd star to pair with Dame & CJ, that means the general consensus is Nurk's value is going down. He may not attract huge offers from other teams.
I disagree... I think Nurk has star potential, he is just 2-3 years away from consistency and Blazers need players to bring it every night while Dame/CJ in their prime. It’s a timing thing more than knock on Nurks talent.
Years away? Im sure that's what Paul Allen told Dame. Dame & CJ might as well leave if that's the case.Lol there is absolutely no move this team can make right now that would catapult them into immediate contention. Just don't have enough assets.
George was pretty much the only hope.
This is a process. And they're still years away.
Lol there is absolutely no move this team can make right now that would catapult them into immediate contention. Just don't have enough assets.
George was pretty much the only hope.
This is a process. And they're still years away.
Missing out on PG, although not really Neil’s fault, is looking more and more painful. He’s already talking about “the decision becoming a lot easier” regarding resigning in OKC because of their record and Westbrook’s leadership. I bet we would be right there with Minnesota with him on our team, Dame is one of the better leaders in the league, and he’s a couple hr flight from LA. Man, what could have been.
Mo + 1st for Bradley?Lol there is absolutely no move this team can make right now that would catapult them into immediate contention. Just don't have enough assets.
George was pretty much the only hope.
This is a process. And they're still years away.
Mo + 1st for Bradley?
Missing out on PG, although not really Neil’s fault, is looking more and more painful. He’s already talking about “the decision becoming a lot easier” regarding resigning in OKC because of their record and Westbrook’s leadership. I bet we would be right there with Minnesota with him on our team, Dame is one of the better leaders in the league, and he’s a couple hr flight from LA. Man, what could have been.
We'd even allow him to shoot in the 4th quarters of games!If Pritchard would have taken what POR supposedly offered (all three 1st round picks, 1 starter other than Dame, C.J. and Nurk and one other player) for PG13, we would be seriously challenging HOU for the second best record in the West right now. And, I think because of superior defense and a more balanced roster, we'd beat HOU in a 7 game series.
PG13 is such a perfect fit in POR. Our defense is currently 7th in the league and would be so much better with George. We'd also have a top 10, possibly top 5 offense with Dame, PG13 and C.J. as our top 3 options.
We'd be so much better than OKC (assuming we didn't gut the roster to add Carmelo the way they did).
I honestly believe that roster would have at least gotten us to the WCF this year, and maybe further still in years to come.
BNM
Let's not forget that Paul George was probably responsible for imploding the Pacers when they were actually good - because he allegedly had an affair with the wife / girlfriend of Roy Hibbert (when he was good).
I understand that PG13 is a very good player - but he is also a questionable teammate...
Butler would have been better than PG13.If Pritchard would have taken what POR supposedly offered (all three 1st round picks, 1 starter other than Dame, C.J. and Nurk and one other player) for PG13, we would be seriously challenging HOU for the second best record in the West right now. And, I think because of superior defense and a more balanced roster, we'd beat HOU in a 7 game series.
PG13 is such a perfect fit in POR. Our defense is currently 7th in the league and would be so much better with George. We'd also have a top 10, possibly top 5 offense with Dame, PG13 and C.J. as our top 3 options.
We'd be so much better than OKC (assuming we didn't gut the roster to add Carmelo the way they did).
I honestly believe that roster would have at least gotten us to the WCF this year, and maybe further still in years to come.
BNM
Butler would have been better than PG13.