THE HCP
NorthEastPortland'sFinest
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 73,077
- Likes
- 62,332
- Points
- 113
Damian is a mediocre PG.
Would one of you stat geeks compare Dame to the 29 other starting PGs and finish this debate please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damian is a mediocre PG.
Who cares what his rookie numbers were? Is Damian on Deron's level now? The fact is, most players don't elevate their game to an elite level, that's why the elite are called elite. Imagining a player will reach that level is wishful thinking. Right now, Damian is a mediocre PG.
Would one of you stat geeks compare Dame to the 29 other starting PGs and finish this debate please.
On it.
Nate, summer league schmummer league. He's not in the upper echelon of NBA athletes and doesn't take it inside much. Guys like Russell Westbrook and Tony Parker for example, makes almost twice as many shots at the rim each game as Damian.
If Damian isn't a top five point guard by the end of the year I think the Blazers need to seriously think about trading him. I've heard he's basically no better than a Damon 2.0 clone.
Don't forget, he's a mediocre athlete as well.
There are very few 6ft + players in the NBA that cannot dunk. A "Mediocre" nba athlete is an incredible athlete by any other standard, but compared to his peers, he's nothing special. Even if you're right about him being a great athlete, so what, he's not using that ability to score inside much, he's not a good defender, and he's shooting a low % from the field.Wow, you've proven that he can dunk.There are very few 6ft + players in the NBA that cannot dunk. A "Mediocre" nba athlete is an incredible athlete by any other standard, but compared to his peers, he's nothing special. Even if you're right about him being a great athlete, so what, he's not using that ability to score inside much, he's not a good defender, and he's shooting a low % from the field.
Here's a list of PGs that are clearly better than Lillard, let alone all the others you could argue about.
Chris Paul,Deron Williams,Derrick Rose,Russell Westbrook,Tony Parker,Kyrie Irving
Stephen Curry, Jrue Holliday and Rajon Rondo are currently the cream of the crop. Lillard is in the middle tier....which is what "mediocre" means, in the middle.
I'm not insulting Damian. He's, just not a top rate PG yet. I think some Blazer fans have been watching the likes of Steve Blake and Raymond Felton so long that a player a PG like Lillard seems like a superstar.
Here's a list of PGs that are clearly better than Lillard, let alone all the others you could argue about.
Chris Paul,Deron Williams,Derrick Rose,Russell Westbrook,Tony Parker,Kyrie Irving
Stephen Curry, Jrue Holliday and Rajon Rondo are currently the cream of the crop. Lillard is in the middle tier....which is what "mediocre" means, in the middle.
lol, what a thread. Really? somebody drink too much?
Here are some comparisons, for athletic purposes. And btw, the reason I said check Derons rookie year is that their stats are very similar. Ages play a role, but I don't think it makes such a huge difference.
#'s deleted.
Wow, you've proven that he can dunk.There are very few 6ft + players in the NBA that cannot dunk. A "Mediocre" nba athlete is an incredible athlete by any other standard, but compared to his peers, he's nothing special. Even if you're right about him being a great athlete, so what, he's not using that ability to score inside much, he's not a good defender, and he's shooting a low % from the field.
Here's a list of PGs that are clearly better than Lillard, let alone all the others you could argue about.
Chris Paul,Deron Williams,Derrick Rose,Russell Westbrook,Tony Parker,Kyrie Irving
Stephen Curry, Jrue Holliday and Rajon Rondo are currently the cream of the crop. Lillard is in the middle tier....which is what "mediocre" means, in the middle.
I'm not insulting Damian. He's, just not a top rate PG yet. I think some Blazer fans have been watching the likes of Steve Blake and Raymond Felton so long that a player a PG like Lillard seems like a superstar.
Actually that doesn't mean mediocre. That would be above average. Mediocre is exactly middle of the pack. Those guards you just mentioned are way ahead of middle of the pack.
This is like saying Aldridge is a mediocre pf because you found 5 other pf that could be possibly better.
No it does not mean exactly, middle of the pack. But I listed 9 PGs that are hands down better than Lillard, there are only 30 teams in the NBA. So if you rank the PGs in the league 20-30 would be sub-par 1-10 would be good 11-19 would be "mediocre". Rank Lillard where you will, but his in the next group of guys, with players like Jennings, Lawson, Lowry etc. In other words, half the teams in the NBA have a PG that is about the same, or better than Lillard. LA ranks much higher on the PF list.
No it does not mean exactly, middle of the pack. But I listed 9 PGs that are hands down better than Lillard, there are only 30 teams in the NBA. So if you rank the PGs in the league 20-30 would be sub-par 1-10 would be good 11-19 would be "mediocre". Rank Lillard where you will, but his in the next group of guys, with players like Jennings, Lawson, Lowry etc. In other words, half the teams in the NBA have a PG that is about the same, or better than Lillard. LA ranks much higher on the PF list.
No it does not mean exactly, middle of the pack. But I listed 9 PGs that are hands down better than Lillard, there are only 30 teams in the NBA. So if you rank the PGs in the league 20-30 would be sub-par 1-10 would be good 11-19 would be "mediocre". Rank Lillard where you will, but his in the next group of guys, with players like Jennings, Lawson, Lowry etc. In other words, half the teams in the NBA have a PG that is about the same, or better than Lillard. LA ranks much higher on the PF list.
Go back and look at some of the rookie stats for the guys you listed.
Chris Paul - 16.1 ppg, 7.9 assissts, 5.1 rebounds, 43% FG, 28.2% from three
Derrick Rose - 16.8 ppg, 6.3 assists, 3.9 rebounds, 47% FG, 22% from three
Russell Westbrook - 15.3 ppg, 5.3 assists, 4.9 rebounds, 39.8% FG, 27% from three
Deron Williams - 10.8 ppg, 4.5 assists, 2.4 rebounds, 42% FG, 41% from three
Tony Parker - 9.2 ppg, 4.3 assists, 2.6 rebounds, 41% FG, 32% from three
Kyrie Irving - 18.5 ppg, 5.4 assists, 3.7 rebounds, 46% FG, 39% from three
Damian Lillard 18.3 ppg, 6.5 assists, 3.2 rebounds, 41.8% FG, 35% from three
So if you look at these numbers, you can see that your argument is absurd. You're comparing him to guys who have been in the league for years, who have honed their craft, who are confident and are conditioned. Lillard is having a stellar rookie season, especially when you compare him to some of the guys you named.
Go back and look at some of the rookie stats for the guys you listed.
Chris Paul - 16.1 ppg, 7.9 assissts, 5.1 rebounds, 43% FG, 28.2% from three
Derrick Rose - 16.8 ppg, 6.3 assists, 3.9 rebounds, 47% FG, 22% from three
Russell Westbrook - 15.3 ppg, 5.3 assists, 4.9 rebounds, 39.8% FG, 27% from three
Deron Williams - 10.8 ppg, 4.5 assists, 2.4 rebounds, 42% FG, 41% from three
Tony Parker - 9.2 ppg, 4.3 assists, 2.6 rebounds, 41% FG, 32% from three
Kyrie Irving - 18.5 ppg, 5.4 assists, 3.7 rebounds, 46% FG, 39% from three
Damian Lillard 18.3 ppg, 6.5 assists, 3.2 rebounds, 41.8% FG, 35% from three
So if you look at these numbers, you can see that your argument is absurd. You're comparing him to guys who have been in the league for years, who have honed their craft, who are confident and are conditioned. Lillard is having a stellar rookie season, especially when you compare him to some of the guys you named.
The funny thing is, if you want to start talking about mediocre, look at Parker's numbers as a rookie. Deron's weren't much better. I think a lot of Dame's shooting problems are related to fatigue and will probably bounce back next season.
To be fair, Parker was a 19 year old as a rookie.
