OK, If Bob Whitsitt "Were" To Apply For The GM Position, Would You Approve?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Would You Approve Of Whitsitt Being Hired?


  • Total voters
    42

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
I wouldn't care if he applied; I would care if he were selected.
 
Not just NO, but HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Remember, he's not a chemistry major! We need one this time.
 
Hell YES!

I loved Whitsitt's teams. I only care about production on the court and he collected assets to build great teams. We got extremely close to winning it all. He didn't have all the lucky lotto draft picks that KP enjoyed yet still put talented teams together.
 
HELL NO!
We dont need anyone from the Jail Blazer era, which includes Warkentein.
 
Sure, I thought he was a good GM. I'd rather him than Ferry.
 
I have no problem at all with Whitsitt applying for the job. Just as long as he's not hired.
 
Sure, why not. Portland is past the point where they need a draft guy (Pritchard) and into the territory where they needs a deal maker.

Say what you want about Whittsit but that dude liked to make deals. Perhaps they could give him an assistant that would tell him things like "You realize that Shawn Kemp is a 300 pound coke-head now, right Bob?"

That's all he really needed.
 
He wouldn't have to take on President duties, leave those to Larry Miller. He wouldn't have to oversee the Seahawks. That guy had too much on his plate before.

Bob cut ties with Chris Dudley and Clif Robinson allowing us to get Brian Grant. Bob got quality free agents with the MLE such as Jim Jackson and Detlef Schremph. Those were players that could start on many teams and would be useful to every team, Trader Bob convinced them to sign on with Portland.
 
He also drafted or signed the likes of Rider, Sheed, Wells, Wingfield, QWoods, and those didn't work out very well IMO.
 
Rider was awesome. Sheed and Wells were too.

Please refresh my memory.....what did we get in return for your "awesome" players when we traded them??
That's right....scraps. They did so much PUBLIC damage to the reputation of the team that we got rid of them for whatever we could get (chairs, used gum, etc.).
 
Please refresh my memory.....what did we get in return for your "awesome" players when we traded them??
That's right....scraps. They did so much PUBLIC damage to the reputation of the team that we got rid of them for whatever we could get (chairs, used gum, etc.).

Bob subscribed to the "buy high, sell low" theory on assets. Bring in big names, most near the end of their careers, sign them to big contracts, and hope that they click on the court and make a run at a title. Not a bad idea when spending someone else's money. The problem for Bob was that his approach didn't even lead to an NBA Finals appearance, let alone a championship.

I'd pass.
 
Please refresh my memory.....what did we get in return for your "awesome" players when we traded them??
That's right....scraps. They did so much PUBLIC damage to the reputation of the team that we got rid of them for whatever we could get (chairs, used gum, etc.).

Made a splash in the NBA. We got past the first round of the playoffs, which I prefer over not doing so.

I could give a shit what the public thinks. Win or go home. high risk, high reward. i love those kind of teams than one that is stable and boring and slowly building up. its not beautiful to see your team getting knocked out in round one. you have to be the badass.
 
Please refresh my memory.....what did we get in return for your "awesome" players when we traded them??
That's right....scraps. They did so much PUBLIC damage to the reputation of the team that we got rid of them for whatever we could get (chairs, used gum, etc.).

Bob traded Rider for Steve Smith. Rasheed was traded for the Josh Smith draft pick although the magnificent John Nash made sure some other team got it.
 
Made a splash in the NBA. We got past the first round of the playoffs, which I prefer over not doing so.

I could give a shit what the public thinks. Win or go home. high risk, high reward. i love those kind of teams than one that is stable and boring and slowly building up. its not beautiful to see your team getting knocked out in round one. you have to be the badass.

Exactly my thoughts. Bob is the only GM since 1992 that has gotten a Blazer team out of the first round.
 
Exactly my thoughts. Bob is the only GM since 1992 that has gotten a Blazer team out of the first round.

He was also the first Blazer GM to construct a team that missed the playoffs in a gajillion years.
 
Last edited:
Trader Bob couldn't win with a $100M payroll.

Ha
Ha
Ha

The Blazers had the lowest payroll last year.
 
What was it, 2nd lowest?

I'll actually look now

The Grizzlies had the lowest payroll and the OKC Thunder had less payroll than us ... I'm sure there are others, but I can't be arsed to go looking for them.
 
“When you sit down and talk basketball with Bob, whether it’s about players or the salary cap or whatever, it’s very clear he has a good grasp of all the different aspects on what’s going on. Obviously the name Trader Bob is well deserved. Bob has a unique combination of skills and he’s open to talking about things in a very direct way, which is the kind of style I really appreciate."

~Paul Allen
 
Bob traded Rider for Steve Smith. Rasheed was traded for the Josh Smith draft pick although the magnificent John Nash made sure some other team got it.
Like a lot of long time GMs Bob had his pluses and minuses in trades and signings during his tenure. Trading Rod Strictland (who he'd signed as a MLE FA) for Sheed was a good one. Getting Damon for Alvin Williams was a meh... resigning Damon to a monster contract was his worst move IMO.

I find it interesting that most of the posted comments thus far are adamantly opposed to him while most of the votes are in the absolutely! column.

STOMP
 
PAUL ALLEN FOR GM AND PLAYER/COACH. He does have FU money after all.
 
The Oregonian has destroyed the last 3 GMs. Two from hate, and one from love, expanding his ego into conceit.

The paper is always meddling in the owner's business, trying to run the team without paying into the business.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top