Oregon Ducks 2023! (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
STOMP said:
They did add one of the highest rated portal guys to their OLine, maybe they won't have to punt so much?

https://n.rivals.com/content/athletes/kadyn-proctor-262133?view=cv

STOMP
Click to expand...
We will see who they add as OC

I know they added Proctor but I don’t see him changing things much.

Part of it is Ferentz offensive philosophy. They’re not gonna go for it on 4th down if it would potentially give the other team good field position and they’re not gonna risk turnovers.
 
MickZagger said:
bummer. I wanted him for my team
Click to expand...
Whatever slim chance Oregon had at landing him went away when Cornelius announced his return, as they have both starting Tackle spots covered. I'm just glad Kadyn didn't just go to another super team

STOMP
 
kjironman1 said:
Money seems to have been the answer.
Click to expand...

I don't agree. There wasn't any significant 'investment' difference between Helfrich and Mario, but they sure recruited at different levels. Now, Mario was a star-chaser to the point a lot of his highly rated recruits were borderline or outright busts. But he did elevate Oregon's recruiting ranking into the top-10

it's a little tricky assigning value to classes when there is a coaching change and high count de-commitments. If you toss out the class that Taggart had a hand in, then Mario's class rankings were #8 - #13 (Covid) - #7. The Mario/Lanning class in 2016 was #16; Lanning's tow classes have ranked #9 and #5

by comparison, the Helfrich/Taggart class ranked #18. The three Helfrich classes ranked #21 (2014) - #16 (2015) - #28 (2016). Chip's 3 classes ranked #13 - #11 - #15

(by the way, in the transition class between Taggart/Mario, Oregon had 13 de-commitments)
********************************************************************************

obviously, the transfer portal and NIL has changed the landscape...a lot. But it's not like Oregon has been spending NIL money and other top schools haven't

now, I've been told a few things by somebody who is in a position to know:

* Phil Knight has been really reluctant to get significantly involved in NIL, at least he was prior to this season. That may have changed but I'm not sure. PK believes his money is better spent on long-term investments like facilities and infrastructure and in some cases, coaching perks. He didn't want to be in a position where a highly-rated recruit, and his agent/representatives could hijack his wallet on an annual basis

* people at Oregon believe that their overall NIL spending might not even rank in the top-10. Close, but maybe not and there are much bigger spenders out there like tOSU, Texas, Texas A&M, Miami.

* the Oregon collectives, especially Division St. are fairly rigorous about setting NIL spending limits for specific players and specific positions and position groups, then holding the line and not engaging in bidding wars. They believe they are getting more 'bang-for-the-buck' than just about any other collective

my hunch from talking to that guy is that the people in Oregon's NIL collectives believe that QB has to be the main focus of NIL money because the Ducks may never be able to compete on an equal basis with the elite programs for DLine talent and overall roster depth.
 
Last edited:
wizenheimer said:
I don't agree. There wasn't any significant 'investment' difference between Helfrich and Mario, but they sure recruited at different levels. Now, Mario was a star-chaser to the point a lot of his highly rated recruits were borderline or outright busts. But he did elevate Oregon's recruiting ranking into the top-10

it's a little tricky assigning value to classes when there is a coaching change and high count de-commitments. If you toss out the class that Taggart had a hand in, then Mario's class rankings were #8 - #13 (Covid) - #7. The Mario/Lanning class in 2016 was #16; Lanning's tow classes have ranked #9 and #5

by comparison, the Helfrich/Taggart class ranked #18. The three Helfrich classes ranked #21 (2014) - #16 (2015) - #28 (2016). Chip's 3 classes ranked #13 - #11 - #15

(by the way, in the transition class between Taggart/Mario, Oregon had 13 de-commitments)
********************************************************************************

obviously, the transfer portal and NIL has changed the landscape...a lot. But it's not like Oregon has been spending NIL money and other top schools haven't

now, I've been told a few things by somebody who is in a position to know:

* Phil Knight has been really reluctant to get significantly involved in NIL, at least he was prior to this season. That may have changed but I'm not sure. PK believes his money is better spent on long-term investments like facilities and infrastructure and in some cases, coaching perks. He didn't want to be in a position where a highly-rated recruit, and his agent/representatives could hijack his wallet on an annual basis

* people at Oregon believe that their overall NIL spending might not even rank in the top-10. Close, but maybe not and there are much bigger spenders out there like tOSU, Texas, Texas A&M, Miami.

* the Oregon collectives, especially Division St. are fairly rigorous about setting NIL spending limits for specific players and specific positions and position groups, then holding the line and not engaging in bidding wars. They believe they are getting more 'bang-for-the-buck' than just about any other school

my hunch from talking to that guy is that the people in Oregon's NIL collectives believe that QB has to be the main focus of NIL money because the Ducks may never be able to compete on an equal basis with the elite programs for DLine talent and overall roster depth.
Click to expand...
I was specifically making reference to the NIL money. There is no question Oregon has plenty of it.
 
Tince said:
They've been pouring a good amount of money into the program since 1994. Up until 2018 it was nearly impossible to get a top 10 recruiting class.
Click to expand...
One question that brings up in my mind. Have the recruiting classes been getting steadily better since the mid 90's? I seem to remember quite a few people saying that Phils money is helping get recruits?
 
kjironman1 said:
One question that brings up in my mind. Have the recruiting classes been getting steadily better since the mid 90's? I seem to remember quite a few people saying that Phils money is helping get recruits?
Click to expand...

It still comes down to the coaches. Good players will always have multiple options on where to play. Players will leave if the coach leaves. Not just the HC but the position coach as well. Phil's money leveled the playing field against the top programs, but if the coach can't recruit then the players will go elsewhere.

Look at the Beavers and all the great players they had under Ralph. Once he left, the program has never been the same. And that was 30 years ago. It will be interesting to see if the recruiting class rankings for Alabama go down now that Saban is gone. I bet they do....at least a little. It is why coaches get paid so much.
 
kjironman1 said:
One question that brings up in my mind. Have the recruiting classes been getting steadily better since the mid 90's? I seem to remember quite a few people saying that Phils money is helping get recruits?
Click to expand...
I've been following recruiting for 15ish years and I would say Oregon's recruiting had steadily improved, but their success has not been linear despite Phil's involvement for 25 years.

As I recall, it wasn't until the Fiesta Bowl win in 2001-02 season we saw Oregon get a big name recruit (Ngata). I'd say between 2002-2010 Oregon's recruiting was somewhat consistent. They could get a big name every other year, some solid skill players from the west coast or Texas, but really struggled to get big time recruits up front. Yes there were exceptions and there ended up being 3*-4* recruits that turned out to be better than anticipted.

After Chip's immediate success as head coach, Oregon's recruiting improved overall, they started getting a couple solid guys up front every class, but still struggled with depth. Frankly though, I'm not sure Oregon's recruiting was as good as it should've been considering their branding and offense was on a whole different level. Come to find out, Chip isn't that great of a recruiter. Then under Helfrich, recruiting took a serious dive, especially considering he also made it to a national championship game in the 2014 season.

Within a year, I'd say Taggart was already the best recruiting head coach Oregon had, part of that being he had guys like Mario on staff who was an elite position recruiter. This was the first time I thought Oregon could sustain being at or around a Top 10 class that had some balance to it. After Taggart bounced, Mario took it recruiting to another level, focusing very heavily on the trenches for the first time, specifically, his speciality on the offensive line. Lanning though has taking recruiting up another notch and I'm not even sure he alone is a better recruiter than Mario, but he's put together a staff that is relentless.

So, have the resources Phil given to Oregon helped recruiting? Yes. Does the relationship with Nike help? Yes. Do these new rules regarding NIL help? Yes. But I would push back at anyone who says players are coming to Oregon because of Nike money. Taggart, Mario, and Lanning were elite recruiters prior to coming to Oregon. Mullens clearly has prioritized hiring a head coach who can bring in talent first. Phil Knight + Justin Wilcox wouldn't be producing top 10 classes, let alone top 5 classes. Oregon moving into the top 5 territory always seemed impossible to me simply because of geography, but it's happening.

Not sure I really answered your question, sorry about that!
 
Last edited:
Tince said:
I've been following recruiting for 15ish years and I would say Oregon's recruiting had steadily improved, but their success has not been linear despite Phil's involvement for 25 years.

As I recall, it wasn't until the Fiesta Bowl win in 2001-02 season we saw Oregon get a big name recruit (Ngata). I'd say between 2002-2010 Oregon's recruiting was somewhat consistent. They could get a big name every other year, some solid skill players from the west coast or Texas, but really struggled to get big time recruits up front. Yes there were exceptions and there ended up being 3*-4* recruits that turned out to be better than anticipted.

After Chip's immediate success as head coach, Oregon's recruiting improved overall, they started getting a couple solid guys up front every class, but still struggled with depth. Frankly though, I'm not sure Oregon's recruiting was as good as it should've been considering their branding and offense was on a whole different level. Come to find out, Chip isn't that great of a recruiter. Then under Helfrich, recruiting took a serious dive, especially considering he also made it to a national championship game in the 2014 season.

Within a year, I'd say Taggart was already the best recruiting head coach Oregon had, part of that being he had guys like Mario on staff who was an elite position recruiter. This was the first time I thought Oregon could sustain being at or around a Top 10 class that had some balance to it. After Taggart bounced, Mario took it recruiting to another level, focusing very heavily on the trenches for the first time, specifically, his speciality on the offensive line. Lanning though has taking recruiting up another notch and I'm not even sure he alone is a better recruiter than Mario, but he's put together a staff that is relentless.

So has the resources Phil given to Oregon helped recruiting? Yes. Does the relationship with Nike help? Yes. Do these new rules regarding NIL help? Yes. But I would push back at anyone who says players are coming to Oregon because of Nike money. Taggart, Mario, and Lanning were elite recruiters prior to coming to Oregon. Mullens clearly has prioritized hiring a head coach who can bring in talent first. Phil Knight + Justin Wilcox wouldn't be producing top 10 classes, let alone top 5 classes. Oregon moving into the top 5 territory always seemed impossible to me simply because of geography, but it's happening.

Not sure I really answered your question, sorry about that!
Click to expand...

good post

as a long time Duck fan I want to add some context: under Bellotti I think Oregon use to do about the best job in the country at identifying underrated talent and then developing that talent and coaching them up (Mike Riley was good at this too). Now, that was back in the days when it was a lot more regional recruiting. California, Washington, Hawaii, Oregon. Word of mouth recruiting. Less air miles and more actual seeing the players live at high school venues. Back in the day when 247, Rivals, On3 were very minor players and the star-ratings systems weren't a thing at all

Oregon almost never was able to recruit 4-star talent on the OLine. What they did was resort to a 'grow-your-own' philosophy. They recruited the 3-star and 2-star and no-star kids who were long and rangy and then developed them into cohesive OLines. The result was that in the latter part of the Bellotti years, and Chip's tenure, and the first half of Helfich's tenure, IIRC, Oregon led the Pac-12 in rushing for 11 straight seasons. And the Duck Olines weren't big and heavy. But they were incredibly mobile and adept at getting to the 2nd level and blocking. Steve Greatwood was a master at this and Bellotti even said that Greatwood was the "best evaluator of HS talent he ever saw"

I doubt that would even be possible now. The star-ratings and class rankings are huge deals. They are integral to branding and keeping elite teams elite. And I'd think coaches are working 70-80 hour weeks all the time now. National recruiting means a lot more air miles and a lot less of actually seeing a player live and more watching video. And a lot more reliance on these recruiting services and websites. Just another way that things are evolving and another way they may not be heading in a good direction
 
Last edited:
wizenheimer said:
good post

as a long time Duck fan I want to add some context: under Bellotti I think Oregon use to do about the best job in the country at identifying underrated talent and then developing that talent and coaching them up (Mike Riley was good at this too). Now, that was back in the days when it was a lot more regional recruiting. California, Washington, Hawaii, Oregon. Word of mouth recruiting. Less air miles and more actual seeing the players live at high school venues. Back in the day when 247, Rivals, On3 were very minor players and the star-ratings systems weren't a thing at all

Oregon almost never was able to recruit 4-star talent on the OLine. What they did was resort to a 'grow-your-own' philosophy. They recruited the 3-star and 2-star and no-star kids who were long and rangy and then developed them into cohesive OLines. The result was that in the latter part of the Bellotti years, and Chip's tenure, and the first half of Helfich's tenure, IIRC, Oregon led the Pac-12 in rushing for 11 straight seasons. And the Duck Olines weren't big and heavy. But they were incredibly mobile and adept at getting to the 2nd level and blocking. Steve Greatwood was a master at this and Bellotti even said that Greatwood was the "best evaluator of HS talent he ever saw"

I doubt that would even be possible now. The star-ratings and class rankings are huge deals. They are integral to branding and keeping elite teams elite. And I'd think coaches are working 70-80 hour weeks all the time now. National recruiting means a lot more air miles and a lot less of actually seeing a player live and more watching video. And a lot more reliance on these recruiting services and websites. Just another way that things are evolving and another way they may not be heading in a good direction
Click to expand...

Thanks for adding this Wiz, great stuff!

How much weight would you put on the theory "Oregon got <<insert recruit>> because of Nike money" that if often written?
 
I would be interested in seeing a recent history of injuries and recovery time from injuries for the Ducks compared to other big programs. Phil Knight has gifted amazing facilities to many of the sports teams at Oregon but one thing that stands out is the focus on the training, health, and meals, what is best for the players.
 
Tince said:
Thanks for adding this Wiz, great stuff!

How much weight would you put on the theory "Oregon got <<insert recruit>> because of Nike money" that if often written?
Click to expand...
Obviously not Wiz…

But I honestly don’t think that’s really a thing, it still comes down to recruiting.

For example, Walter Nolen probably had equivalent offers from all his suitors. It comes down to personal factors, preferences and recruiting.

I’m sure Jabbar is getting similar offers from schools. Same scenario.

More NIL just means more opportunities, but you’re not solely gonna get a player from NIL.

No one is just running around offering players 5x what other schools are offering.

Now if the case was “we wouldn’t have this class without Nike money” that’s probably correct, because you need to have the money to open the door to recruit said player … but that’s no different than any other school.
 
Predator said:
Obviously not Wiz…

But I honestly don’t think that’s really a thing, it still comes down to recruiting.

For example, Walter Nolen probably had equivalent offers from all his suitors. It comes down to personal factors, preferences and recruiting.

I’m sure Jabbar is getting similar offers from schools. Same scenario.

More NIL just means more opportunities, but you’re not solely gonna get a player from NIL.

No one is just running around offering players 5x what other schools are offering.

Now if the case was “we wouldn’t have this class without Nike money” that’s probably correct, because you need to have the money to open the door to recruit said player … but that’s no different than any other school.
Click to expand...

I agree. The Jabbar recruitment might be a great example of just this. He is from Texas, has a cousin playing on the team, and Texas' resources are unmatched, yet Oregon appears to be the favorite over Texas to land him.

That's nuts!
 
Tince said:
Thanks for adding this Wiz, great stuff!

How much weight would you put on the theory "Oregon got <<insert recruit>> because of Nike money" that if often written?
Click to expand...

well, first there needs to be a distinction between Nike money and Phil Knight money. Nike is not pouring million into Oregon without reciprocity. They have a business arrangement with the school; and they also have business arrangements with lots of schools.

obviously, PK made his fortune from Nike so I guess you could say there's a connection. But that's really just quibbling the source of hundreds of millions. Pocket change for guys like us

I think Oregon's sports marketing program may have directly brought more recruits in than PK's money. At least on a literal level. PK's money certainly upgraded Oregon's facilities to an elite level and that can sure leave a good impression with recruits. And obviously Oregon has spent 25 years on a branding campaign and uniforms supplied by Nike are part of that

but in the new age of NIL, all bets are off the table....and stuffed into bags

I think the theory about 'Nike Money' swaying recruits is mostly what fans of other teams tell themselves when Oregon outworks them and lands the recruit they wanted
 
wizenheimer said:
well, first there needs to be a distinction between Nike money and Phil Knight money. Nike is not pouring million into Oregon without reciprocity. They have a business arrangement with the school; and they also have business arrangements with lots of schools.

obviously, PK made his fortune from Nike so I guess you could say there's a connection. But that's really just quibbling the source of hundreds of millions. Pocket change for guys like us

I think Oregon's sports marketing program may have directly brought more recruits in than PK's money. At least on a literal level. PK's money certainly upgraded Oregon's facilities to an elite level and that can sure leave a good impression with recruits. And obviously Oregon has spent 25 years on a branding campaign and uniforms supplied by Nike are part of that

but in the new age of NIL, all bets are off the table....and stuffed into bags

I think the theory about 'Nike Money' swaying recruits is mostly what fans of other teams tell themselves when Oregon outworks them and lands the recruit they wanted
Click to expand...

The last line is exactly how I feel!

Nike is not invested in Oregon winning. Phil on the other hand....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top