Wizard Mentor
Wizard Mentor
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 14,676
- Likes
- 14,939
- Points
- 113
Re: Mark Cuban's Comments on Sterling
It seems similar to a neighborhood homeowners association. If the neighborhood doesn't like you can they force you to sell the house? My guess is that they can only if they violate some provision within the homeowner's contract. I don't think Sterling has and I don't think Cuban believes he has either.
It seems similar to a neighborhood homeowners association. If the neighborhood doesn't like you can they force you to sell the house? My guess is that they can only if they violate some provision within the homeowner's contract. I don't think Sterling has and I don't think Cuban believes he has either.
It is the market deciding this. Or rather business owners acting in the interest of maximizing profits in a market. It wasn't the US federal or a state government that decided to come together to form the NBA. It was a collection of businesses and individuals. That collection put together their own constitution with the end goal of securing and maximizing profitability.
The basic question is, "Does keeping Sterling around help the NBA (and thereby the owners) maximize profitability?" This isn't about Big Brother. It's all about the market.
Cuban is asking, "Does getting rid of Sterling create a 'slippery slope' where any owner could lose his ownership if he behaves like a jackass?" You can see why Cuban especially would be worried about this. I don't think this is a slippery slope at all. If I were an owner, I'd keep that in mind and put some limitations in there, but at the end of the day Sterling is damaging the NBA product. His dickishness is sidetracking the playoffs and tarnishing the brand of the entire league. He's an idiot and a dinosaur, and he's done enough damage.



