Now list the teams that would have any money left over to put a team around him, or even fill out an adequate NBA roster. That narrows the field a bit.
		
		
	 
Too many possible scenarios to list.  Funny though, the Knicks are one of the teams that are totally gutting their roster, practically giving away players and letting them walk for nothing in order to clear cap space.  They will most likely loose both David Lee and Nate Robinson to free agency because they won't pay them what they are worth this summer for fear of losing out on the LeBron sweepstakes next summer.
So, who exactly are the Knicks going to hasve left under contract after next season?  Looks like Eddie Curry at $11.2 million and Jared Jeffries at $6.9 million.  That's $18 million tied up in worthless crap.  And, they will also hold team options on Danilo Galinari at $3.3 million and Wilson Chandler at $2.1 million.  And, this is the "quality" supporting cast that's going to lure LeBron to NY?  Yeah, right.
 
	
		
	
	
		
		
			So they should blow their cap on three players, is what you're saying.
		
		
	 
If those three players are D-Wade, LeBron and Bosh, HELL YES!  Christ, that would be like winning the lottery.  Any GM in the league would kill to have three players that talented on their roster - and they would all be young enough to keep the team competing for titles for a decade.
Plus, Miami is in a much better roster situation than the Knicks.  They have ZERO bad contracts (See Curry and Jeffries) after next season eating up valuable cap space and payroll dollars.  And, they will have affordable team options on Michael Beasley ($4.9 million), Dequan Cook ($2.1 million) and Mario Chalmers ($847K).  Who knows, since Wade has a player option at $17 million for the 2010-11 season, he could decide NOT to opt out, allow the Heat to sign LeBron and Bosh to max deals, and then get his own max. 6-year contact starting in 2011-12.  The Heat would hold his Bird rights and could go as far over the cap as they want to res-sign him.  They could fill out their roster using exceptions - and since the NBA requires all teams to have at least 13 players under contract, they would be able to pick up multiple vets for the veteran's minimum salary (which is based on years in the league).  Who wouldn't want to play on a perennial contender with LeBron, D-Wade and Bosh in sunny, tax-free Miami?
	
		
	
	
		
		
			Your own past statements have made the taxes argument moot.
		
		
	 
What?????  How so?  Several NBA players have mentioned they'd rather play for teams in states with low, or no, state income tax.  The savings can easily add up to over $10 million over the life of a 5 or 6 year contract.  What player in his right mind wouldn't want an extra $10+ million in his pocket?
The Heat are in a MUCH better situation than the Knicks.  They already have one superstar with championship exprience, no bad contracts, better cheap, young talent, better weather and no state income tax.  There will be other teams with lots of cap space, but if I was a player looking for the best possible situation, it would be Miami, without a doubt.  The Knicks will have cap space, but they won't have shit on their roster, they have no recent history of winning, they have lousy weather, and ultra high state and city taxes.
BNM