Eastoff
But it was a beginning.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 16,080
- Likes
- 4,071
- Points
- 113
It's called reinvesting.Gotta do something with that extra change from the Republican tax bill.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's called reinvesting.Gotta do something with that extra change from the Republican tax bill.
make Portland a fucking Contende
And then Nike turned around and made Colin Kaepernick their spokesman, soBig deal. Phil Knight gave $500,000 to Knute Buheler’s election campaign.
https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/08/phil_knight_contributes_500000.html
I did a search for Paul Allen before I made my thread - I'm guess the antifa thread title was a Sly joke?
If you had my seats and my money you'd be spending plenty.Welp - that's the nail in the coffin for me. Not that I spent much money on the Blazers to begin with, but not another penny.
If you had my seats and my money you'd be spending plenty.
Big deal. Phil Knight gave $500,000 to Knute Buheler’s election campaign.
https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/08/phil_knight_contributes_500000.html
I disagree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
Everyone, even billionaires, have a right to be part of the political discussion. It's good citizenship.
Someone said he donated to both parties to hedge his bets so he'll be in the ears of whomever wins. That seems like a smart rich guy thing to do.
It's odd since the Portland Trail Blazers was the first NBA team to support marriage equality.
I'm plagued with a strong aversion to that, make that a powerful overwhelming aversion. Otherwise, you'd have a deal.If you want to give me your seats and your money I can make that happen.
barfo
The question is, do Billionaires have a right to a greater part of the political discussion than anyone else? I say NO.I disagree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
Everyone, even billionaires, have a right to be part of the political discussion. It's good citizenship.
Welp - that's the nail in the coffin for me. Not that I spent much money on the Blazers to begin with, but not another penny.
The question is, do Billionaires have a right to a greater part of the political discussion than anyone else? I say NO.
Not give a shit? We give him money by supporting the Blazers so it matters what that person is using his money for.So whats the problem in him supporting what he wants?
I thought the left & right supported tolerance and individual rights and you shouldn't give a shit! Obviously thats not true.
One of the very reasons I left both parties.
Paul Allen's contribution is chump change compared with the big time political donations by fat cats of all stripes. His donation amounts to only ten percent of the hundredth person on this list of top political contributors:
https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php
My point is if you are not tolerant in what he does with his money, then don't support the Blazers. But, you can also support them and still have feelings about where he spends his money, not right or wrong.Not give a shit? We give him money by supporting the Blazers so it matters what that person is using his money for.
Wow. My respect for Paul Allen just doubled. All this time I thought he was a wing nut liberal.
Perhaps he is.
Just not Her nut job wing. I am surprised they let her make ads for her campaign.
You are confusing Phil with Paul.
Phil gave money to Knute
Paul gave money to congressional republicans
barfo