Players about to become all-stars (besides Harden)

[PapaG]

LOL. And you mock me for reading. I'll repeat my question. Try following along.

did anyone mention us getting westbrook?

Blaze01 did.

 

[RR7]

Blaze01 did.

no, he was the one laughing at others for suggesting it.

 

[blazerboy30]

You define it.

Are you 12?

You made the statement using the term. Why should I define how you used it?

 

[RR7]

Are you 12?

You made the statement using the term. Why should I define how you used it?

so he can twist what you say to further his little games?

 

[PapaG]

Are you 12?

You made the statement using the term. Why should I define how you used it?

Your argumentative approach is predictable and boring. Define the term, blahblahblah. Then change the parameters without answering anything.

Go find somebody else to play with, fake Stanford grad.

 

[PapaG]

so he can twist what you say to further his little games?

Oh, the teammate ruse. Nicely played!

 

[blazerboy30]

Your argumentative approach is predictable and boring. Define the term, blahblahblah. Then change the parameters without answering anything.

Go find somebody else to play with, fake Stanford grad.

You asked if the board consensus was that Harden is more valuable than Westrook. Valuable in what way? Pure production? Relative to salary? Relative to age?

Sorry you can't handle an intelligent conversation.

 

[blazerboy30]

Awesome... another thread ruined by the attention-needing troll. This time displaying true intelligence! Maybe it's the lupus?

did anyone mention us getting westbrook?

Yes, someone did mention it.

can you show me where in this thread that happened? thanks.

I'd love to pry Harden away from the Thunder.

Readers are leaders.

And just to prove his high level of maturity...

So, the board consensus is that Harden is more valuable than Westbrook as a player?

Define "more valuable".

You define it.

Go find somebody else to play with, fake Stanford grad.

 

[MickZagger]

You define it.

Well, people are using the stats that you always trump out. Like PER in comparison with USG Rate and of course WS.

You're so inconsistent its gross.

 

[PapaG]

You asked if the board consensus was that Harden is more valuable than Westrook. Valuable in what way? Pure production? Relative to salary? Relative to age?

Sorry you can't handle an intelligent conversation.

I know. I can't handle it. Please leave me alone. You're too smart for me.

 

[PapaG]

Well, people are using the stats that you always trump out. Like PER in comparison with USG Rate and of course WS.

You're so inconsistent its gross.

Would you rather have Westbrook or Harden on a max contract? I'd rather have Westbrook. It's as simple as that to me.

 

[MickZagger]

Would you rather have Westbrook or Harden on a max contract? I'd rather have Westbrook. It's as simple as that to me.

Harden. But, the sub-arguments that lead up to that easy tissy-fit were par for the course.

 

[blazerboy30]

Well, people are using the stats that you always trump out. Like PER in comparison with USG Rate and of course WS.

You're so inconsistent its gross.

So was Kobe, with a PER of 23.9 in 2011 more "valuable" than Rose with a PER of 23.5 in 2011? Would you have traded Kobe straight across for Rose?

 

[blazerboy30]

Would you rather have Westbrook or Harden on a max contract? I'd rather have Westbrook. It's as simple as that to me.

Oh, so you DID want to include salary in the discussion. Try getting your logic straight before crying next time.

 

[MickZagger]

So was Kobe, with a PER of 23.9 in 2011 more "valuable" than Rose with a PER of 23.5 in 2011? Would you have traded Kobe straight across for Rose?

You're arguing with the wrong guy. He said the board thinks that Harden is more valuable than Westbrook to the Thunder. I pointed out that using the statistics that he always trumps out, yes, that would be the case.

Pertaining to your question, yes I would have traded Kobe for Rose. But, I don't let advanced statistics be the end all of my opinion. Sometimes the eyeball test plays a role.

 

[PapaG]

Oh, so you DID want to include salary in the discussion. Try getting your logic straight before crying next time.

I already posted it was in the discussion, at least in terms of trade value. Westbrook would be more valuable in terms of a trade, IMO. Read the thread. I already posted that was my thought.

But, I'm sure you read that, processed it, and came out with an algorithm saying it didn't make sense.

I can't handle your intellect. Please stop harassing me. I'm a mental midget.

 

[Fez Hammersticks]

So worked up over a non-Blazer player.

 

[blazerboy30]

But, I'm sure you read that, processed it, and came out with an algorithm saying it didn't make sense.

I can't handle your intellect. Please stop harassing me. I'm a mental midget.

See... we can come to an agreement about some things.

 

[blazerboy30]

Pertaining to your question, yes I would have traded Kobe for Rose. But, I don't let advanced statistics be the end all of my opinion. Sometimes the eyeball test plays a role.

Interesting opinion.

How's Ammo been playing lately?

 

[PapaG]

See... we can come to an agreement about some things.

Well, sure, but only after you miss the obvious. I kid!

 

[RoyToy]

You're arguing with the wrong guy. He said the board thinks that Harden is more valuable than Westbrook to the Thunder. I pointed out that using the statistics that he always trumps out, yes, that would be the case.

Pertaining to your question, yes I would have traded Kobe for Rose. But, I don't let advanced statistics be the end all of my opinion. Sometimes the eyeball test plays a role.

Yes you do

 

[PapaG]

Interesting opinion.

How's Ammo been playing lately?

 

[MickZagger]

Interesting opinion.

How's Ammo been playing lately?

A burn from 8 years ago? You dug deep for that. But, he's got 2 rings.

 

[MickZagger]

Yes you do

O Rly?