ironcrotch
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,675
- Likes
- 34
- Points
- 48
That would probably become the ultimate masterstroke from Olshey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My theory is Portland will claim Darko then match batum
Now that would be funny. If only Darko didn't suck so badly.
Why claim Darko? Isn't the point of having Leonard and Freeland to get them some burn and see what they can do? I'm all for signing Hickson as he and LA can play together to give us an athletic front line, but Darko seems like a giant waste at this point.
More of a tongue in cheek take on fucking Minnesota by not only matching the player they amnestied Darko for, but also signing Darko
gotcha ... tough to tell which days you take your meds!
Maybe Hickson looked at steve blake, and said "man I could stay at 4 million a year, and keep on getting signed!"I love that he signed for one year, and totally understand it from the Blazers side, but what the hell is the benefit to Hickson for doing it?

I'm suprised Hickson wasn't offered more than that by another team. I wish Portland would have locked up up longer term, because he's a very good front court guy, he can start at C and back up either PF of C.
Now we just need a backup PG, and we're all set for a crappy season!![]()
Heres JJ Hickson dropping 29 against the Clippers on 3-30-12. Enjoy !
[video=youtube;wi9AHvhUh9Q]
