maxiep
RIP Dr. Jack
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,321
- Likes
- 5,919
- Points
- 113
Some more missives from those peaceful pro-union folks: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...dock?sms_ss=facebook&at_xt=4d841bfd06cc4406,0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.myspace.com/katherinewindels
Status: In a Relationship
Here for: Dating, Serious Relationships, Friends
Hometown: Jericho, Vermont
Orientation: Straight
Height: 5' 3"
Ethnicity: White / Caucasian
Religion: Catholic
Zodiac Sign: Sagittarius
Smoke / Drink: No / Yes
Education: Grad / professional school
Occupation: Elementary Education Teacher
Schools
University Of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison,WI
Graduated: N/A
Degree: Professional
Major: Education
Minor: Education
MADISON - A Dane County Circuit judge issued a temporary restraining order Friday that will block the publishing of Governor Walker's collective bargaining law.
Judge Maryann Sumi granted the emergency order blocking publication after Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit alleging that a joint legislative committee violated Wisconsin's open meetings law when it hastily scheduled a hearing on Walker's bill.
The Republican-controlled Legislature passed the measure and Gov. Scott Walker signed it last week. The law can't take effect until it's formally published, and Democratic secretary of state Doug La Follette had planned to wait the full 10 days allowed to publish it March 25.
Judge Osumi made no ruling on the merits of the collective bargaining law, only that its passage through the joint committee violated the open meetings law and could therefore not be published until Ozanne's lawsuit is adjudicated.
This is a little old, but since it hasn't been mentioned:
http://www.620wtmj.com/news/local/118242784.html
Wouldn't this be better?
In April, the school board rejected a proposal from the Kaukauna Education Association to extend the union’s contract and incorporate pension and healthcare concessions along with a wage freeze, a move the union projected could save the district about $1.8 million next year.
http://www.postcrescent.com/article...ter-changes?odyssey=tab|topnews|img|FRONTPAGE
No. $1.9m (the difference between -$400k and +$1.5m) is superior to $1.8m.
Ed O.
No, I have four friends with that particular degree.
Since both are estimates, and nearly identical in dollar amounts, I think the taxpayers come out far better in the long run by gratiously accepting the union's generous offer of personal sacrifice rather than spit on their offer and alienate the people who will be educating their children.
Update on the email death threats to GOP lawmakers.
Here is the perp, and surprise, she is a Catholic, straight, and a non-smoker!
![]()
http://www.myspace.com/katherinewindels
Status: In a Relationship
Here for: Dating, Serious Relationships, Friends
Hometown: Jericho, Vermont
Orientation: Straight
Height: 5' 3"
Ethnicity: White / Caucasian
Religion: Catholic
Zodiac Sign: Sagittarius
Smoke / Drink: No / Yes
Education: Grad / professional school
Occupation: Elementary Education Teacher
Schools
University Of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison,WI
Graduated: N/A
Degree: Professional
Major: Education
Minor: Education
These are the people teaching our kids.
I disagree. I think the state is much better off being able to control how much they spend on education, rather than being held hostage by those who have decided to educate their children.
Ed O.
So you feel the State Government of WI has nobody competent to negotiate a fair labor contract with teachers?
Can we all agree on the following things?
1. That elections in this country are--by and large--free and fair.
2. That elections can have consequences if your side loses.
3. That for all its failings, we agree that our government is a democratic republic.
4. That if you lose, you at least have the duty to show up.
5. That if you choose not to show up, you have no right to complain about the outcome.
Is any of the above unreasonable? If so, which parts to you find objectionable?
Teachers have unions and political organizations that help get politicians elected. Those politicians then negotiate with the unions. Often, politicians know that they can negotiate locally and, if things go bad, ask the state for assistance... so they have less incentive to risk a strike or labor strife.
It's less about being smart and more about being focused.
Ed O.
So we agree completely it seems.
The problem is crooked politicians and the stupid voters who put them in office.
It has nothing at all to do with teachers.
My wife suggested measuring what the kids learned during the year as opposed to measuring one class's scores against another class in a different school.... If the kids aren't getting any smarter, then the teacher probably isn't teaching.
It definitely does have something to do with teachers and organized labor.
Ed O.
Not at all.
If we make the assumption that all politicians faithfully and honestly represent their constituency and all voters are intelligent enough to choose their own representatives through a ballot process I don't see how teachers can tip the scales at all.
