Politics Public Impeachment Hearings

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
julius said:
You do realize I was talking about you, right? Give an answer with substance instead of corny soundbites or talking points.
Click to expand...

Not presuming to answer for ABM, but in my own case you attack me for mostly posting sworn testimony and facts in evidence.

Either way, it's hard to take this 3-year tantrum seriously as it's a conservative's wet dream to watch the Dem party completely and probably permanently destroy themselves in a public setting.

This will still be hilarious when it's taught in political history classes 50 years from now.
 
MARIS61 said:
Not presuming to answer for ABM, but in my own case you attack me for mostly posting sworn testimony and facts in evidence.

Either way, it's hard to take this 3-year tantrum seriously as it's a conservative's wet dream to watch the Dem party completely and probably permanently destroy themselves in a public setting.

This will still be hilarious when it's taught in political history classes 50 years from now.
Click to expand...


You are seriously misguided and confused.
 
You guys crack me up, suddenly you're Libertarians while you're defending the Libertarian Party's #1 enemy. I've never seen either of you post anything remotely supportive of Libertarian ideology.

Pretty hard to swallow.
 
This will be a most interesting thread to review later.
The democrat house will impeach. Hell they have said so by the time they handed Nancy the gavel. The hearings are simply to feed the flock.

The Senate will not convict. Shoot, it will not even be close. <- An interesting review point. Why did the house even send it here?

Then the next interesting review point will be in early next November. After Trump's reelection, yes, but the most interesting will be how badly the Democrat House lost their majority due to this, anti-American folly. They do not have a Presidential candidate with coattails to help care a majority in the house, especially in the face of a failed impeachment.

How many rabid S2 impeachment advocates will admits to simply talking out their arse?
 
Last edited:
David Holmes's Q and A didn't go well at all, quickly became obvious he fabricated his testimony on "overhearing" both ends of a Sondland to Trump phone call.
 
i think the best part of all of this for me is imagining how LIVID maris and marazul would be if this was Clinton or Obama who did all this, with all of these honorable witnesses, veterans, transcripts, etc. They would lose their shit. It would literally be the exact opposite, they are so blinded by their love of Trump. So pathetic.
 
MARIS61 said:
You guys crack me up, suddenly you're Libertarians while you're defending the Libertarian Party's #1 enemy. I've never seen either of you post anything remotely supportive of Libertarian ideology.

Pretty hard to swallow.
Click to expand...

On second thought, as a lifelong Dem who switched to Libertarian in 2015, I welcome you aboard.

News Flash though, Trump is the closest thing to a Libertarian President you'll see running in 2020.
 
calvin natt said:
i think the best part of all of this for me is imagining how LIVID maris and marazul would be if this was Clinton or Obama who did all this, with all of these honorable witnesses, veterans, transcripts, etc. They would lose their shit. It would literally be the exact opposite, they are so blinded by their love of Trump. So pathetic.
Click to expand...

I did not support the impeachment of Bill Clinton, even though he did indeed commit actual crimes.
I did not call for the impeachment of Obama, even though he did indeed cause me and my family more actual harm than any President ever did.

Give both of the above, it seems you make irrational assumptions.
 
calvin natt said:
i think the best part of all of this for me is imagining how LIVID maris and marazul would be if this was Clinton or Obama who did all this, with all of these honorable witnesses, veterans, transcripts, etc. They would lose their shit. It would literally be the exact opposite, they are so blinded by their love of Trump. So pathetic.
Click to expand...

If you actually watched the hearing you'd realize the evidence presented so far has only solidified the long-uninvestigated accusations against Clinton and drug Obama ever closer into the quagmire. Most of the witnesses are far from honorable, fired for felony leaking and/or abuse of office for personal goals, and are currently under investigation by John Durham for criminal conspiracy in Ukraine.
 
MARIS61 said:
If you actually watched the hearing you'd realize the evidence presented so far has only solidified the long-uninvestigated accusations against Clinton and drug Obama ever closer into the quagmire. Most of the witnesses are far from honorable, fired for felony leaking and/or abuse of office for personal goals, and are currently under investigation by John Durham for criminal conspiracy in Ukraine.
Click to expand...

you're in lala land.
 
MarAzul said:
I did not support the impeachment of Bill Clinton, even though he did indeed commit actual crimes.
I did not call for the impeachment of Obama, even though he did indeed cause me and my family more actual harm than any President ever did.

Give both of the above, it seems you make irrational assumptions.
Click to expand...


Livid. Blood boiling, but nope. Not my Trumpkin.
 
Congressman Ratcliff screamed at Fiona Hill, insulted her, refused to allow her to answer, then stormed out of the room.

She remained calm.

But hey, women are just too emotional for leadership.
 
crandc said:
Congressman Ratcliff screamed at Fiona Hill, insulted her, refused to allow her to answer, then stormed out of the room.

She remained calm.

But hey, women are just too emotional for leadership.
Click to expand...
Maloney was terrific to counter that. "Mansplaining" is in the official congressional record now, lmao.
 
MARIS61 said:
You guys crack me up, suddenly you're Libertarians while you're defending the Libertarian Party's #1 enemy. I've never seen either of you post anything remotely supportive of Libertarian ideology.

Pretty hard to swallow.
Click to expand...
calling fellow citizens the #1 enemy says it all......and for the record I'm an independent who voted Libertarian last election...and if you go back to that election I've clearly posted why....selective memory or have you just lost the ability to have a civil conversation about it? You might want to get your throat checked out if you can't swallow. Your posting has been one sided "Hanoi Hannah" type rants since Trump arrived.....I understand why you have the fake character disclosure in your sig..I will say I'm happy to see you start posting in first person even if it's a character you've invented....beats the cut and paste frenzy
 
Here's a list I compiled with the names of every witness who testified that POTUS Trump told them to do something or anything illegal pertaining to Ukraine investigating Biden and other Americans long suspected by Ukraine of crimes in Ukraine. I will add to it as needed as more testimony is given:

1.
 
MARIS61 said:
Here's a list I compiled with the names of every witness who testified that POTUS Trump told them to do something or anything illegal pertaining to Ukraine investigating Biden and other Americans long suspected by Ukraine of crimes in Ukraine. I will add to it as needed as more testimony is given:

1.
Click to expand...

Do you know you aren't actually Roger Maris, who hit 61 home runs one year?
 
MARIS61 said:
If you actually watched the hearing you'd realize the evidence presented so far has only solidified the long-uninvestigated accusations against Clinton and drug Obama ever closer into the quagmire. Most of the witnesses are far from honorable, fired for felony leaking and/or abuse of office for personal goals, and are currently under investigation by John Durham for criminal conspiracy in Ukraine.
Click to expand...
Fox news commentary is not "watching the hearings"....I've watched them all pretty much and guess what....your monarch is being exposed by calm, honest public officials...something Trump will never be...and Trump is as far from a Libertarian as one could be....Libertarians believe in the constitution, so do I....but I'm not a registered Libertarian..they also believe in small govt and fiscal conservative practices. When this is over, your view of Trump will sadly be quite embarrassing for you.
 
MarAzul said:
The hearings are simply to feed the flock.
Click to expand...
truth is not truth schpiel by Rudy won't fly this time around......if there's a flock to be seen it's the GOP......and they're running out of food
 
crandc said:
Congressman Ratcliff screamed at Fiona Hill, insulted her, refused to allow her to answer, then stormed out of the room.

She remained calm.

But hey, women are just too emotional for leadership.
Click to expand...

Proverbs 17:28 New International MARIS61 version:

"Even a Deep State Traitor is thought wise if she keeps silent, and discerning if she holds her tongue."
 
MarAzul said:
In 1961, I thought I was a democrat...
Click to expand...
I don't believe in lifelong political affiliations for myself...I take each election at face value and vote my conscience. I'm not a republican or democrat or libertarian...I'm an American...which is why I don't have blinders on from administration to administration. It all comes down to trust in leadership for me. Simple. For years around here you guys have wanted to put anti Trump sentiments in the same box but it doesn't apply at all. You just bought into Trump's partisan rally calls....and his catch phrases. Personally, I'm beyond the age of such schoolyard taunting. Trump isn't trustworthy or deserving of the honor of serving our great country. It's demonstrable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top