Politics Public Impeachment Hearings

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

She is a disgrace to her country, and all Real American Federal Employees are disgusted by her ilk who think they can use their position of trust to further their personal goals. She endangered our country, lied to our allies about our official positions on corruption and tried to prevent a legitimate Ukrainian investigation into Americans who have profited from promoting corruption in Ukraine, covered crimes by a VP, risked starting a war with Russia, covered crimes by the DNC and US Intelligence officers to rig the 2016 election, covered crimes by US Intelligence officers framing Trump associates, lied under oath in conflicting testimony in fake impeachment sham while ultimately offering no evidence whatsoever.
And Epstein didn’t kill him self.
Funny, how all the senior State Department officials and those senior officials working closely with the State Department officials who have testified before the House Intelligence Committee have exclaimed how excellent she was in her job. Funny how her performance reviews were all touting her excellent performance.
 
Agreed, and all "testimony" in this "impeachment" has been nothing but slander.
So much slander, in fact, that you'd have to conclude that it's all a huge conspiracy by the deep state that hates Trump.
 
Not really.


Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.

The latest figures include 37% who Strongly Approve of the job Trump is doing and 42% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -5. (see trends).

The president’s overall approval has been tracking up since Wednesday, the first day of the House impeachment hearings. It was at 46% on Wednesday morning, then rose to 48% yesterday and is now at 50%. Two of the three nights in today’s survey follow the highly-publicized hearings.

Regular updates are posted Monday through Friday at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily email update).

Now that Gallup has quit the field, Rasmussen Reports is the only nationally recognized public opinion firm that still tracks President Trump's job approval ratings on a daily basis. If your organization is interested in a weekly or longer sponsorship of Rasmussen Reports' Daily Presidential Tracking Poll, please send e-mail to beth@rasmussenreports.com.
According to Gallup, Trump's disapproval has dipped down to about 55%.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/203207/trump-job-approval-weekly.aspx
 
What a hilarious farce.

Most Dems suddenly silent about it while desperate to change the subject.

Reps will regain the house,
I'll take that bet in a heart beat.
 
I am still waiting for the hundreds of real Americans who consider Ambassador Yovanovich a disgrace to come on Fox news and spill it. Or for Maris to admit he just repeated an internet rumor.

Not holding my breath.
 
I am still waiting for the hundreds of real Americans who consider Ambassador Yovanovich a disgrace to come on Fox news and spill it. Or for Maris to admit he just repeated an internet rumor.

Not holding my breath.
Trump essentially did that on F&F this morning.
 
Here are my thoughts:

As an independent voter,

Those hearings were bad for our country. They were devisive on both sides. Did President Trump do things that make a reason for the House to draft articles of impeachment? Seems like it. Will that go anywhere in the Senate? No. Will that result in a serving president running for reelection with an impeachment request on his record? Yup.

If he gets re-elected, imo, that is just not a good look for a country. Not just the USA, ANY country. An arm of the government says he shouldn't be in the Oval Office for multiple reasons. Despite that, if he has enough power (political, monetary, business) to control and overcome those articles, it just doesn't seem right to me.

On a different (but semi-related note) I'm actually most worried about the judiciary branch. Votes matter and it starts from the local level. The supreme Court isn't the only court where there are judges. Everybody has a voice and that voice isn't used on a message board, it's used at the ballot box. I support everyone's vote and THAT is why this country is great. Not because we have devotion to a specific party affiliation.

Okay, I'm done.
 
Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella shakes hands with Barack Obama in Oval Office

90

Here's a picture of Obama shaking hands with the real whistleblower:
_92573344_mediaitem92573343.jpg


barfo
 
Here's a picture of Obama shaking hands with the real whistleblower:
_92573344_mediaitem92573343.jpg


barfo

Obama had just finished telling Trump he was about to give nearly 2 billion in CASH to Iran....effectively subsidizing their ongoing terrorist activities. Trump wanted to rip his arm off.
 
Obama had just finished telling Trump he was about to give nearly 2 billion in CASH to Iran....effectively subsidizing their ongoing terrorist activities. Trump wanted to rip his arm off.

Big Mac donnie would stand no chance and weasel out because of bone spurs and then lie about it.
 
If he gets re-elected, imo, that is just not a good look for a country. Not just the USA, ANY country. An arm of the government says he shouldn't be in the Oval Office for multiple reasons. Despite that, if he has enough power (political, monetary, business) to control and overcome those articles, it just doesn't seem right to me.
So lemme get this straight, are you saying the House should just ignore the crimes that he commits just because his cronies in the senate will acquit him? This is some seriously messed up logic.

How about we actually hold people in office accountable for the crimes they have committed first before deriding the process just because it's "not a good look for a country." Bribing a foreign country for aid in a political campaign in "not a good look for a country."

Also, is everyone just going to brazenly brush aside the fact that over 20 women have accused him of assault?
 
So lemme get this straight, are you saying the House should just ignore the crimes that he commits just because his cronies in the senate will acquit him? This is some seriously messed up logic.

I didn't say that at all. Where did I say anything about ignoring crimes?

How about we actually hold people in office accountable for the crimes they have committed first before deriding the process just because it's "not a good look for a country." Bribing a foreign country for aid in a political campaign in "not a good look for a country."

All for holding elected officials accountable!

Also, is everyone just going to brazenly brush aside the fact that over 20 women have accused him of assault?

I don't feel ike I have brazenly brushed anything aside, especially accusations that I didn't even mention in the first place. The guy is corrupt and a terrible person. 100 million+ thought he should be president, unfortunately.
 
Trump has been having one on one lunches with "soft" Republican Senators, to remind them of their oath to protect, defend, and uphold Donald Trump and to render full faith and credit to Donald Trump.

Wasn't that the oath they took?

Unlikely even if he shoots people on 5th Avenue that 20 Republicans would vote to convict, but he wants zero. That way he can point to it as purely partisan. The Republican Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Trump crime family.
 
It appears we do indeed have a flaw in the election/impeachment system in the Constitution.
Trump won 32 states which gave him a rather large electoral win. While losing in 18 states and DC.
However, even though the founders admonished not to impeach a President along partisan lines alone, we now for the first time, will do the deed actuality that way.

Once you analyze the electoral map, it becomes clear how easy it is to undo the electoral election by impeachment.

Trump States.png
I don't think it would have always been this easy in years past, but now with Coastal states being mostly Democrat by huge majorities, those same states that
Trump failed to win, the 18 can now impeach the Republican that won election with a substantial electoral margin. Since the election is state by state election
the difference between election and impeachment is huge. As it is pretty much by strait population count as how the Representatives are allocated.
Even though Trump won Texas, they do have 13 Democrat Reps to help impeach the President.

So it will take around 20 states to actually tally enough votes to impeach a President elected by 32 States.
That is a serious flaw and now that it is recognized I doubt a Republican President will ever run a term.

I think the Constitution needs to be amended to have the states vote with a majority required to validate the house's impeachment vote before it ever goes to the Senate for trial.
 
Last edited:
I didn't say that at all. Where did I say anything about ignoring crimes?



All for holding elected officials accountable!



I don't feel ike I have brazenly brushed anything aside, especially accusations that I didn't even mention in the first place. The guy is corrupt and a terrible person. 100 million+ thought he should be president, unfortunately.
Point taken, but that number is 63 million, not 100
 
Point taken, but that number is 63 million, not 100

and it was around 10 million voters that didn't vote for trump when factoring in the 3rd party candidates. I have always believed that we should have a system of 1 person 1 vote and the one with the most votes wins as that's how it is done in all elections except president.
 
and it was around 10 million voters that didn't vote for trump when factoring in the 3rd party candidates. I have always believed that we should have a system of 1 person 1 vote and the one with the most votes wins as that's how it is done in all elections except president.

uh, President and VP are the only elections done by more than one state.
 
Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella shakes hands with Barack Obama in Oval Office

90
If this is indeed the"whistleblower" you've threatened his safety by posting this....any good real American would know better .Our laws are in place to protect his identity. I'm sure you found it elsewhere on the internet
 
Or perhaps it was only gas...either way, it must have been a relief.
 
Back
Top