Eastoff
But it was a beginning.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 16,096
- Likes
- 4,101
- Points
- 113
Crow, I guess I'm a bit confused by your position. You've stated elsewhere that you can only accept as real that which can be proved, and yet you are willing to go to great lengths of conjecture about possible explanation of "infinite god-free universe" and "possible workarounds to the apparent necessity of an absolute beginning" to avoid having to acknowledge an external causative factor for the origin of our universe. To put it another way, suppose that there is actually a god that created this universe and, because he is outside of our universe his existence cannot be proven in any scientific way. Your philosophy would seem to require you deny the real answer to creation and go off in search of any other notion that the human mind can conjure up to potentially explain the origin of the universe absent a god, even if those notions cannot themselves be proven or tested. I constantly hear atheists refusing to believe in a "god of the gaps". I have an equally hard time with a "science of the gaps" approach.
If a being created our universe, but lived outside of our universe, it would imply that being crossed the "outsideness." Therefore we too could somehow cross this "outsideness." So we could scientifically prove/find that being if it still existed.
