<div class="quote_poster">M Two One Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">I gave you the explaination of how the system works at a European club athletics department using Real Madrid as the example. There is nothing unnecessary what-so-ever. There was nothing midleading about the original statement either. You wrote again and I quote:
Being
rich, that's
all that counts, from your words. Your response to my post that Real Madrid
BC (short for basketball club) were richer then the entire league:
Ah, the big "upside" to being a single athletics club instead of a single sport league focused team. Profits are earned entirely different from one to the other. One (league) makes money from a combined source through several teams so that one doesn't fail in merchandising while the other earns 100% of their profits.
Also, you can't count a multi-sport athletics club by one source, you combine all revenues. Rich is rich no matter where the money comes from.</div>
Well I
never doubted that Real Madrid was more rich. You quoted me yet I think you missed the point. Purely speaking on the amount of money Euro leagues spend on Baloncesto contracts, the NBA still owns them and probably will for a long time (possibly until the end of time or until Americans find a better sport).
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
Well again,
your opinion. Respected of course and I'm also sure you would do the same with another person's opinion. BTW, yes that is a great film. Kubrick is the master.</div>
Oh no, I see what you're trying to get at. I just think you're getting carried away, whereas I feel I have a body of work/success to fall on in my views of the NBA and USA Olympic Basketball. We created basketball and control our future.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Make yourself clear when you make statements or else people are not going to understand you correctly. When you write this:
:That doesn't clearly state what you meant then. The way you wrote your response, it appears as though you meant that some domestic leagues might be able to somewhat compete with the NBA, when I was only originally refering to the Euroleague - a continental club competition.</div>
Well you have to understand, I wasn't really expecting a long discussion. I threw out a flourish and "that was the end of that" I thought at the time.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">The domestic leagues could never compete with the NBA alone unless the NBA had a financial crises or completely folded. Not going to happen unless one of the NBA's major problems persists and are broken to the public at a more detailed level. The NBA is still in a hot spot and the referee scandal isn't nearly the worst of their continuous issues.
Just like with football over in Europe people cannot expect small clubs to reach the same level of power to the big boys where politicians and for some part even criminals are involved. In basketball it is becoming the same, small clubs cannot compete financially with the likes of Real Madrid or especially CSKA Moscow, who have funds coming from dozens of non-sporting sources including their own government. If they want something, they'll get it.</div>
K, I have now addressed all of this thankfully.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
A good example would be J.R. Holden. This American player exceeded an amount of Americans allowed on the Russian Super League rosters as per order for development of youth for future International competition. Instead of waiving him or another player they simply asked Putin to grant him dual citizenship. Wish granted. Think of how it will be with NBA team players once the sport reaches a certain point of popularity in Europe. It will be a fight for contracts, but money usually always wins.
The thing is here, bro, is that I've seen how these two systems work first hand. I've been watching and researching how the European system grows rapidly and how the North American one is going up and down over more then a decade now. One funny example of revenue collapses has been loyalty. Americans don't usually have allegiances to teams, unlike Europeans who often worship their club as if the sport were a war. A sustained revenue that continuously grows rapidly is by far and away better then one that goes up and down within a league controlled financial system.
In 10 to 20 years when the sport becomes a monster in Europe and the NBA still has their continuous issues, the big clubs won't just be grabbing away role players from NBA teams.
</div>
Well you're coming to a lot of ambitious conclusions. First, would be that Europe will continue this huge upward incline of revenue. The money stream could level out or the NBA could remove the cap if necessary. Why presume that the NBA will continue to get tolchocked in the gulliver?
How does the NBA market their game? With superstars, and that's all they really care about. It is part of the reason why the refs are calling touch fouls these days. The major stars will always want to be inclined to stay in America (because they're American usually
), and the NBA probably won't stand idle when X BC starts offering Kobe Jr/III/IV hardcore cash 20 or 30 years from now.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
There are no rules about spending in Euroleague. They can spend their hearts away. Given the money that the players will bring those rich clubs based on merchandise sales alone would allow them to spend 50 to 200 million dollars without much of a care. Europeans are also much more into sports merchandise then people from the Americas are. Madrid already has reached that level, but aren't willing to spend that type of money on basketball players just yet. That goes for any of the big European clubs. Basketball is still gaining ground and you wouldn't believe how fast.</div>
Let's see them reach this level. Inflation in NBA contracts continue to grow as well, I am not worried about anything as of yet.
Speaking of which, the rich NBA markets in the USA could compete very favorably in a capless market.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
Also, the NBA as a whole could never reach a level of financial income to the combined sources of the biggest Euroleague basketball clubs. That will never happen, ever.
</div>
Again,
combined sources. This isn't a discussion about who can write the biggest check, but rather who will have the dominant Basketball league.
The only thing I envy about the FIBA/Euroleagues/whatever are the rules.