<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (King Shake @ Jul 13 2008, 10:39 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Lawl, this guy. It has been tough, but not that hard. But I don't sweat about chicks. Bitch's aint' shit but hoes and tricks.</div>
Fuck yeah, that's the way it's gotta be. I've adopted that view on females ever since the beginning of the Summer
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Legacy @ Jul 13 2008, 10:45 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 13 2008, 09:27 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Legacy @ Jul 13 2008, 10:24 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't think tremaine really thinks that they are better. He's kind of like John Hollinger.</div>
Haha, sweet. We have our very own John Hollinger, here on S2.
</div>
Haha, have you seen his thread?
</div>
I've seen all of his long, lengthy threads based on crazy stats that I understand, but that mirror Hollinger's obsession with stats.
I don't dislike Tremaine at all, I love all the good insight he has at times. I feel bad for him, too, with that Nuggets team with bad coaches, management, and seemingly mismatched players.
And as for the long threads he constantly makes, I've noticed he has a blog and other sites that he regularly posts these things on, so they're not necessarily going to waste. Seems he's posting things on here in hopes that more fans will come and more people will respond...similarly with any other site he posts his things on.
What I appreciate about him is that when he does post something, and someone agrees or disagrees, he comes out and gives a lengthy response full of insight and fully explaining why he feels that way. Well, most of the time. There are a few times where he bases something completely on beliefs with no proof or basis on this other than because he feels that way. But who doesn't do that?