- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Messages
- 17,493
- Likes
- 4,221
- Points
- 113
If they finish second in the East in points that's a bad regular season how exactly?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't speak for others, but for me we've seen this team have great regular seasons and win nothing. We've gotten close, but haven't won with BETTER teams than this one. This team isn't bad, but they just lack heart and hustle it seems like. When the puck is drifting towards them, instead of going and getting it they wait for it to get to them which results in a turnover.Typical of many of you that you avoid a question and continue on your little childish agendas. I'll ask again not really expecting an intelligent answer since that's impossible here. The Rangers are basically second in the conference in points. Somebody explain how that's a bad season.
Both of those guys could be gone after this season, definitely Boyle. Stepan is here with a NTC and making $6M for the foreseeable future. That is why he should have been traded. That's a lot of money tied up in an above average player who also has a NTC. This team goes full retard with NTC as if they won't come back and hurt this team, like we see currently with Girardi and Staal.Stepan has been our best player the past 10 days or so. Good to see.
I have a few guys I would focus on before I got to Stepan. Hayes and Boyle to name two.
Both of those guys could be gone after this season, definitely Boyle. Stepan is here with a NTC and making $6M for the foreseeable future. That is why he should have been traded. That's a lot of money tied up in an above average player who also has a NTC. This team goes full retard with NTC as if they won't come back and hurt this team, like we see currently with Girardi and Staal.
Exactly. This team has too much tied up in the defensive zone. If you have Hank making as much as he is, then you shouldn't bank on him winning you games and you should emphasize offense and try winning games 5-3. Live with the lapses defensively for a great offense. However, this team is built 100000% defensively and yet we are not defensively sound and the defense is tied up with NTC and therefore unmovable. So while we all WANT better and more offense, it's simply not going to happen without defensive moves and freeing up cap space for the future and refusing to give out NTC like they're candy and don't eventually come back and bite you in the ass.Cap management certainly hasn't been great. In a lot of ways they have operated with a mindset that there is no cap when you look at some of the contracts they handed out. For example if you're going to tie such a high cap number to your net minder then you cannot have so many high cap numbers on defense. It kills your ability for example to add that other big forward.
That is why there is ZERO chance Yandle is back here unless Staal or Girardi are moved. I laugh when I read how they may bring him back if they don't move 1 of those 2 guys. That isn't about is there actual money to pay him, this is about cap management team balance wise is it smart to pay ANOTHER dman a huge AAV...the answer is a HUGE no. Yandle CANNOT be back here if Staal or Girardi aren't moved IMO.
I will also add, it is a VERY fair question to ask...is it a winning formula to have a goalie with a huge 8.5 mill cap hit. I don't know the answer, but I do know it was something I was concerned about when we resigned Hank, even though I knew we had to do it. That is a lot of money tied up in a goalie.
Best point is we need balance. When you have a goalie with that big of a cap hit it is hard to have a bunch of dmen also with big cap hits. That is why Yandle cannot come back if Girardi and Staal are both here.
.