- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 126,882
- Likes
- 147,515
- Points
- 115
Don't bother with the sequel.
I was looking at the reviews of it on IMDB and it sounds like it is horrible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't bother with the sequel.
Don't bother with the sequel.
The problem I had with the movie is that it took the original (which was already pushing the lines of over the top) and multiplied everything tenfold, so really they weren't even characters, just "roles" if that makes any sense. For example, in the first, Greenley was obviously an idiot, but it was funny. In the second, his stupid is taken to the extreme and it is no longer believable. The cheeseball factor was just too much for me to bear. I mean, come on, duel-wielding Desert Eagles? Give me a break.Sequel was actually pretty good IMO. Not as good as the original but I typically go into sequels expecting them to suck ass and this one did pretty well to maintain the same quality and style.
Obviously it took a hit by replacing Dafoe with that chick but it was still a solid movie. 6.7/10 on IMDB isn't a bad rating...
I just reserved a movie called Moon. Anyone seen it? Any good?
The problem I had with the movie is that it took the original (which was already pushing the lines of over the top) and multiplied everything tenfold, so really they weren't even characters, just "roles" if that makes any sense. For example, in the first, Greenley was obviously an idiot, but it was funny. In the second, his stupid is taken to the extreme and it is no longer believable. The cheeseball factor was just too much for me to bear. I mean, come on, duel-wielding Desert Eagles? Give me a break.
As far as IMDB ratings, I tend to take those with a grain of salt. For a while there, The Dark Knight was rated as number 1 in their top 250...before it was even released. A lot of scores on there tend to be a bit inflated due to the fanboy factor.
The problem I had with the movie is that it took the original (which was already pushing the lines of over the top) and multiplied everything tenfold, so really they weren't even characters, just "roles" if that makes any sense. For example, in the first, Greenley was obviously an idiot, but it was funny. In the second, his stupid is taken to the extreme and it is no longer believable. The cheeseball factor was just too much for me to bear. I mean, come on, duel-wielding Desert Eagles? Give me a break.
As far as IMDB ratings, I tend to take those with a grain of salt. For a while there, The Dark Knight was rated as number 1 in their top 250...before it was even released. A lot of scores on there tend to be a bit inflated due to the fanboy factor.
just let it go. you're #6 on this subject.What the deuce? There is already a thread like this. What are you, shut-ins? Y'all live in some windowless Mormon compound together?
Funny People
7/10
Judd Apatow's most serious movie. A dramedy.
Funny People
7/10
Judd Apatow's most serious movie. A dramedy.
Former high school cheerleading captain Rose Lorkowski (Adams) is a thirty-something single mother who cleans houses for a living. Wanting to send her trouble-making eight-year-old son Oscar (Jason Spevack) to a private school, Rose decides to take the advice of her married lover (Steve Zahn) and get into the "lucrative" business of crime scene cleanup. Rose convinces her disillusioned, underachieving sister Norah (Blunt) to join her in the enterprise, which she calls "Sunshine Cleaning." The sisters begin to find meaning in their function to "help" in some way in the aftermath of a loss, just as the job stirs up memories of their own mother's suicide. Their priorities and goals tested, Rose and Norah face hard challenges as they strive to improve their live
Mother (South Korea) 9/10
I just reserved The Bad Lieutenant for tonight. I'm hopeful that it's good.
Hasn't that movie been out for 18 years? Hell ya it's good!
I just reserved The Bad Lieutenant for tonight. I'm hopeful that it's good.
