He's not better than Crabbe, Moe, or Turner when given starter minutes and they're the #1 or #2 option on their team. Which they all would be if they had gotten traded to Chicago or Indiana.
Tell me why they wouldn't be? Especially for Crabbe.
Seriously, you think Allen Crabbe is better than Zach LaVine?????
Crabbe may be THE most 1-dimensional player in the entire NBA, and one of the most overpaid. Crabbe does one thing, and only one thing well - catch and shoot wide open 3-pointers. He cannot create his own shot and he cannot create for others. He's a horrible rebounder for his size and was the worst defender on a bad defensive team.
LaVine is 3 years younger, FAR cheaper ($3.2 million vs. $18.5 million), can create his own shot and finish at the rim and can create for others. His 2FG% was actually higher than Crabbe's and he gets too the FT line more. He can beat people off the dribble and Crabbe can't.
The one, any only thing Crabbe does better is catch and shoot wide open 3-pointers. LaVine's 3FG% is well above league average and he's not afraid to shoot a 3 with a defender within the same zip code.
Crabbe was assisted on 97% of his 3FGs and 77.5% of his 2FGs. He is reliant on others to create shots for him. LaVine was assisted on 80.8% of his 3FGs and 46.6% of his 2FGs. He can, and does create his own shot. Crabbe cannot.
LaVine's AST% was 12.6, Crabbe's was 6.1. LaVine can create for others. Crabbe cannot.
Trading Butler signifies that the Bulls are in full on rebuild mold. Rebuilding around a multifaceted 22-year old that makes $3.2 million makes a hell of a lot more sense than rebuilding around a 1-dimensional 25-year old that makes $18.5 million.
BNM