Funny Rent Control

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
My rent has gone from 775 per month to 1300 in 4 years.

Nothing has changed at my place. Not even my paycheck.

The only thing that changed was the manager 8x and owner of the property.

They're "developers" from California.

Fuck. Them.
 
dviss1 said:
My rent has gone from 775 per month to 1300 in 4 years.

Nothing has changed at my place. Not even my paycheck.

The only thing that changed was the manager 8x and owner of the property.

They're "developers" from California.

Fuck. Them.
Click to expand...

What have your school bond issues done?
 
donkiez said:
In your scenario were socialists unregulating the lending and financial markets and creating derivatives?

Seems more like a capitalist ponzi scheme to me.
Click to expand...

Oh wow! Are you ever blaming the tail for the dog wave.
 
...I still need to get interpretation on these new laws, but so far it is a big fat NAY! If I understand correctly, I won't be able to sell me rental property in a couple years like I had originally planned because my renter has already been there for 1.5 years and the new law will prevent us from terminating the month-to-month lease in order to sell our house? That seems awfully invasive to me -- I should be able to sell my property whenever I want, regardless of current rental/tenant situation :dunno:
 
HAAK72 said:
...I still need to get interpretation on these new laws, but so far it is a big fat NAY! If I understand correctly, I won't be able to sell me rental property in a couple years like I had originally planned because my renter has already been there for 1.5 years and the new law will prevent us from terminating the month-to-month lease in order to sell our house? That seems awfully invasive to me -- I should be able to sell my property whenever I want, regardless of current rental/tenant situation :dunno:
Click to expand...

From what I've read, the Bill requires landlords to give tenants 90 days’ notice of eviction and pay them one month’s rent.

Link to summary of Senate Bill 608 from the Oregon Association of Realtors site:
https://oregonrealtors.org/sites/default/files/Senate Bill 608 summary.pdf

Does selling your home count as a for-cause or no-cause eviction?

The bill is intended to provided protections for tenants. Thus, if a home owner wishes to sell their home, this law would have no effect on that transaction (which is between the buyer and the seller) unless the rights of a tenant are affected. Fixed-term leases will always continue, unless there is a tenant-based reason (failure to pay rent) for eviction. On a month-to-month tenancy of under a year, a no-cause notice may be issued with 30-days’ notice. On a month-to-month tenancy of over a year, 90-days’ notice and the payment of relocation expenses (1-month’s rent) will be required.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
MarAzul said:
You should try the Motorcycle. Man! The sense of freedom! And then the sense of oneness with the earth!

You just need to take care of not making that oneness, total.
Click to expand...
Problem is the soccer moms making him one with their Explorers or minivans.
 
Honestly rent is incredibly out of control and kind of helped me go into we should just buy a home mode (and I'm glad we did) our house payment is much less then what most people for rent these days.

Not sure I like this bill, but we do have a big problem with people not being able to afford to put a roof over their families head.

The more I read this bill, my heart kind of likes the direction of it, my head doesn't really like the bill itself though.
 
Rent control? Why is it needed?

Ha! You have a City in a self imposed Urban growth boundary, that by it's very nature and purpose causes high housing cost and shortages.
Now to make up for this predictable affect on rental prices, we get another government program to artificially constrain rent.
While at the same time this same government welcomes all immigrants to this area of housing shortages.

Why do you guys put up with this level of ineptitude managed by gross ignorance? Is there no one that see how stupid this circle jerk is?
 
MarAzul said:
Rent control? Why is it needed?

Ha! You have a City in a self imposed Urban growth boundary, that by it's very nature and purpose causes high housing cost and shortages.
Now to make up for this predictable affect on rental prices, we get another government program to artificially constrain rent.
While at the same time this same government welcomes all immigrants to this area of housing shortages.

Why do you guys put up with this level of ineptitude managed by gross ignorance? Is there no one that see how stupid this circle jerk is?
Click to expand...
Ever pay rent in San Diego recently or San Francisco? That's what happens when they move up here and buy property at 2 or 3 times the local value...I've been offered an insane amount for my small piece of Oregon...won't sell..I'm all for making a profit but it's gotten to where too many young folks are priced out of the market
 
Last edited:
MarAzul said:
Nope!
Have not paid rent any where in the past 60 years. err, except for boat slips.
Click to expand...
My children in California struggle with the cost of living like I never had to when I lived there.
 
riverman said:
My children in California struggle with the cost of living like I never had to when I lived there.
Click to expand...

I don't doubt it.
I checked out Santa Barbara last spring, one of my favorite places. There is no where to live available there, and certainly not at a price workers could afford to pay. I ask a couple people eating at the same table while I was having a sandwich. Where do the people that work in this town live?

Oxnard was the likely the source of most of the labor force. Well, now, Oxnard was something else too. Schools overflowing, no way to build anything due to protecting the farm land, while the population of the City has increase by an estimated 55 to 65 thousand immigrants since 2010. It is appalling!
I am waiting to see how Oregon follows this pace set by California.
 
MarAzul said:
I don't doubt it.
I checked out Santa Barbara last spring, one of my favorite places. There is no where to live available there, and certainly not at a price workers could afford to pay. I ask a couple people eating at the same table while I was having a sandwich. Where do the people that work in this town live?

Oxnard was the likely the source of most of the labor force. Well, now, Oxnard was something else too. Schools overflowing, no way to build anything due to protecting the farm land, while the population of the City has increase by an estimated 55 to 65 thousand immigrants since 2010. It is appalling!
I am waiting to see how Oregon follows this pace set by California.
Click to expand...
Carpentaria isn't to bad...have friends there. Also, Ventura.
Much better than Oxnard for sure....
 
Hoopguru said:
Carpentaria isn't to bad...have friends there. Also, Ventura.
Much better than Oxnard for sure....
Click to expand...

I was surprised Oxnard has a nice Marina area. Still, overall kind of shit though. Ventura is sweet.
 
HAAK72 said:
...I still need to get interpretation on these new laws, but so far it is a big fat NAY! If I understand correctly, I won't be able to sell me rental property in a couple years like I had originally planned because my renter has already been there for 1.5 years and the new law will prevent us from terminating the month-to-month lease in order to sell our house? That seems awfully invasive to me -- I should be able to sell my property whenever I want, regardless of current rental/tenant situation :dunno:
Click to expand...

Not sure if it is relevant to your situation, but surely some buyers buy with the intention to use as rental property, and having a tenant already is probably not a negative in that case?

barfo
 
barfo said:
I believe that is the everywhere way.

barfo
Click to expand...

Really? I had not heard of stupid laws being passed somewhere else lately.

I admit, I have little experience with being a renter. The first house I rented though, I was very happy the landlord rented it to me.
It made it possible for me to stay there and finish school.
 
barfo said:
Not sure if it is relevant to your situation, but surely some buyers buy with the intention to use as rental property, and having a tenant already is probably not a negative in that case?

barfo
Click to expand...

...yeah seems like there is a lot of sift thru here and some clauses that only pertain to those with 4 or more rental properties etc etc :dunno: will figure it out in 2022 when we plan to list our home for sale in Albany
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

44Thrilla
SI announces Sportsman of the Year
Replies
4
Views
598
MickZagger
MickZagger
EL PRESIDENTE
Johnny Manziel- discuss
Replies
18
Views
847
EL PRESIDENTE
EL PRESIDENTE
EL PRESIDENTE
Exclusive Motorhome/RV life?
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
tlongII
tlongII
B
Espresso Maker- Nespresso?
Replies
0
Views
289
Buzz Killington
B
EL PRESIDENTE
Who gets bullied more? Nerds or Gays?
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
Colonel Ronan
Colonel Ronan

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top