Report: Blazers will have the worst starting 5 in the Western Conference (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

If the Blazers tank I hope they do it right. I hope teams beat us so bad that Barrett actually has to call the games STRAIGHT. That would be interesting, here Barrett and Rice unable to "homer" the calls. Wow. What a change.
 
Actually I was responding to Brian.

The L*kers won 21 last year. Let's see how you break down the teams, and how you think we're going to be worse than that:

PG: Dame v. Ronnie Price (20 Starts), Jeremy Lin (30 starts) and Jordan Clarkson (32 starts)
SG: Henderson/CJ vs. K*be (35 starts), Wayne Ellington (36 starts), Clarkson (6), Jabari Brown-not-Parker (4) and Vander Blue (1) with Swaggy P Nick Young coming off the bench
SF: Aminu v. Wesley Johnson (59) Carlos Boozer (22), Jordan Clarkson (1)
PF: Ed Davis/Meyers Leonard v. Ryan "White Raven", (I swear I'm not making that up) Kelly (34), Ed Davis (24), Jordan Hill (20), Carlos Boozer (4)
C: Plumlee/Leonard v. Jordan Hill (37) Tariq Black (27) , Robert Sacre (18)

There is literally nowhere aside from K*be v. CJ where there is even a shot that the L*kers starters are as good as our starters this year. And they won 21 games. How do you expect we'll win less?
 
Some of us old school farts actually still have a pad and pen on the desk. Hell I can still write in cursive
Thnx Rman I don't need a calculator .......too often.
 
I miss dipping the girl’s hair sitting in front of me into the ink well (before fountain pens), put not the nuns playing whack-a-mole with my knuckles.

+> I went through Catholic grammar schoool. The experience was fucked up. One nun who was a great knuckle torture expert actually looked like Ernest Borgnine. Of course, our parents did not complain like they could now. All of these events plus other disappointments turned me off and away from the Catholic church. God is relevent but the middlemen are in question.
The church should have let natural social evolution occur and allow married people like other Christian religions
 
For all of you saying we're going to be "20 wins" bad, last year MIN and the L*kers were the only teams in the West to win less than 29 games. Even the worst Blazers team of my lifetime won 27 games, and that's with KP legitimately trying to tank the last 1/3 of the season.

We aren't the worst starters in the west, and we're damn sure not the worst roster in the West, much less in the East...we may end up with a lotto pick, but it'll be the 9-14 variety (barring insane luck) rather than the 4-9 variety. And that's ok with me.

Worst. Possible. Scenario.
 
For all of you saying we're going to be "20 wins" bad, last year MIN and the L*kers were the only teams in the West to win less than 29 games. Even the worst Blazers team of my lifetime won 27 games, and that's with KP legitimately trying to tank the last 1/3 of the season.

The 2005-06 Blazers won just 21 games. You must be much younger than you seem. That team finished even worse, losing 28 of their last 31 games, than the KP coached team the previous season.

BNM
 
36EC3A7A-6D06-4D2C-9DAC-5BD578485EF3-5742-0000028B74D255C1_zps8c0172be.jpg
 
The 2005-06 Blazers won just 21 games. You must be much younger than you seem. That team finished even worse, losing 28 of their last 31 games, than the KP coached team the previous season.

BNM
Well, there ya go. I stand corrected, and the point still stands that the worst team that Boob's ever seen still won more than 20 games.

Edit: To be fair, I was at sea most of that season, so I never saw them play.
 
Well, there ya go. I stand corrected, and the point still stands that the worst team that Boob's ever seen still won more than 20 games.

Edit: To be fair, I was at sea most of that season, so I never saw them play.
Don't worry. Most of us want to forget that terrible season!
 
The L*kers won 21 last year. Let's see how you break down the teams, and how you think we're going to be worse than that:

PG: Dame v. Ronnie Price (20 Starts), Jeremy Lin (30 starts) and Jordan Clarkson (32 starts)
SG: Henderson/CJ vs. K*be (35 starts), Wayne Ellington (36 starts), Clarkson (6), Jabari Brown-not-Parker (4) and Vander Blue (1) with Swaggy P Nick Young coming off the bench
SF: Aminu v. Wesley Johnson (59) Carlos Boozer (22), Jordan Clarkson (1)
PF: Ed Davis/Meyers Leonard v. Ryan "White Raven", (I swear I'm not making that up) Kelly (34), Ed Davis (24), Jordan Hill (20), Carlos Boozer (4)
C: Plumlee/Leonard v. Jordan Hill (37) Tariq Black (27) , Robert Sacre (18)

There is literally nowhere aside from K*be v. CJ where there is even a shot that the L*kers starters are as good as our starters this year. And they won 21 games. How do you expect we'll win less?

J. Hill > Plumlee
Kobe > Henderson

Johnson = Aminu
Davis (Lakers best PF) = Davis

Dame > Price

2015 Lakers (21 wins) slightly > 2016 Blazers (projected 15-20 wins)
 
Kobe played 35 games. The other 47 were Wayne Ellington and Jabari Brown and Vander Blue. Not > Henderson.

Hill may be better than Plumlee, but none of the stats say that. Plumlee's younger, plays better D, higher PER, higher Reb%, higher shooting %'s, everything except FT%. He sucks there. But even if I said Hill was better, are you forgetting about Tariq Black and Robert Sacre starting 45 games?

I'm also interested in why you think Wes Johnson is on the same level as Aminu. By almost any measure, Wes completely sucks and Aminu's better at everything on offense, rebounding, and everything on defense. Edit: Sorry, not everything on offense. Wesley's a better 3pt shooter. 35%-27%.

AND THEY STILL WON 21 GAMES!
 
We could tell Lillard the team plane leaves a hour later then it actually does. He misses a few road trips and we'll be looking at 20 games.

Problem solved.

Now Sly!!! Tisk Tisk!

Uh, wrong. This team is horrible. The only thing worse than our starters is our bench.

Ive nailed it. I know why your posts bother me so much. Because you are always so negative and down on the team but never provide any statistical analysis to back up your beliefs and comments.

Please, for the love of God (and this forum), once in a while back up your opinions with substance... or try. It will help so much more in the understanding of your posts. At first I thought you were a troll. seriously. Someone on here posting one line negatives to stir drama. Ive come to know that you are a Blazer fan, but seriously. Once in a while you might find trying ti be positive will brighten your day. :)
 
J. Hill > Plumlee
Kobe > Henderson

Johnson = Aminu
Davis (Lakers best PF) = Davis

Dame > Price

2015 Lakers (21 wins) slightly > 2016 Blazers (projected 15-20 wins)
Wrong!

Kobe played half the season and when he did play, he was shooting a dismal sub 40%

Hill has nothing short of a complete disappointment. That's why they let him go.

Johnson was alright, but he was hardly something to compare to Aminu with.
 
Kobe played 35 games. The other 47 were Wayne Ellington and Jabari Brown and Vander Blue. Not > Henderson.

Hill may be better than Plumlee, but none of the stats say that. Plumlee's younger, plays better D, higher PER, higher Reb%, higher shooting %'s, everything except FT%. He sucks there. But even if I said Hill was better, are you forgetting about Tariq Black and Robert Sacre starting 45 games?

I'm also interested in why you think Wes Johnson is on the same level as Aminu. By almost any measure, Wes completely sucks and Aminu's better at everything on offense, rebounding, and everything on defense. Edit: Sorry, not everything on offense. Wesley's a better 3pt shooter. 35%-27%.

AND THEY STILL WON 21 GAMES!
You also forgot to mention how horrible the Laker's coach was too.

And Dame is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than any PG they fielded
 
Jeez, it's pretty sad when our debates are not over whether the Blazers will suck or not, but rather the order of magnitude that they're going to suck by. I figure they're going to lose at least half of their games. That's a sufficient measure of suckitude for me at this point.
 
Jeez, it's pretty sad when our debates are not over whether the Blazers will suck or not, but rather the order of magnitude that they're going to suck by. I figure they're going to lose at least half of their games. That's a sufficient measure of suckitude for me at this point.

Whooaaa.. . stop the train. IF we lose half our games, that means we win half our games. That's not a success this next year to you? I think about 99% of us would consider that way better than expected and would consider that a huge win of a season considering.
 
Really digging the rebuilding roster Neil has put together.

25 and under, we have Dame (25), Leonard (23), CJ (23) as our big 3 prospects, with Plums (25) and Aminu (24) projecting as likely starters. Vonleh (19) and Harkless (22) as the high potential guys, and Crabbe (23) as an emerging role player. Then we have three extremely long shot prospects in Frazier (24), Patty (22), and Montero (22), who may or may not find second contracts.

Henderson is our oldest player at 27. Ed Davis follows him at 26. Both can probably start on half the teams in the league now and have likely plateaued in terms of their development.

I don't think we will be nearly as bad has been made out nationally. Even if a couple of our prospects reach their potential, we will be set up really well over the next few years. Key here is getting ample PT for the deserving youngins, lots of focus on player development behind the scenes, and nailing this next lotto pick. I think we win about 35-40 next season, get one more lotto pick, and a younger FA, and we're back in the mix in 2017 in the playoffs/
 
The L*kers won 21 last year. Let's see how you break down the teams, and how you think we're going to be worse than that:

PG: Dame v. Ronnie Price (20 Starts), Jeremy Lin (30 starts) and Jordan Clarkson (32 starts)
SG: Henderson/CJ vs. K*be (35 starts), Wayne Ellington (36 starts), Clarkson (6), Jabari Brown-not-Parker (4) and Vander Blue (1) with Swaggy P Nick Young coming off the bench
SF: Aminu v. Wesley Johnson (59) Carlos Boozer (22), Jordan Clarkson (1)
PF: Ed Davis/Meyers Leonard v. Ryan "White Raven", (I swear I'm not making that up) Kelly (34), Ed Davis (24), Jordan Hill (20), Carlos Boozer (4)
C: Plumlee/Leonard v. Jordan Hill (37) Tariq Black (27) , Robert Sacre (18)

There is literally nowhere aside from K*be v. CJ where there is even a shot that the L*kers starters are as good as our starters this year. And they won 21 games. How do you expect we'll win less?
Not everyone is saying they are a twenty win team either. Personally I've sort of got the number 27.5 floating around in my head as the over-under. Still probably bad enough for a top 7 pick.
 
Not everyone is saying they are a twenty win team either. Personally I've sort of got the number 27.5 floating around in my head as the over-under. Still probably bad enough for a top 7 pick.
Fair enough...I started out responding to the "worst starters in the West" thing and gradually got different targets (like 20 wins). I've said before that I could see this team much like the 2007-8 team that ripped off the 13-game Christmas Streak and ended up 41-41. But if you told me 27 wins, I'd probably call that the floor.

We'll see in April. :cheers:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top