OT Roe V Wade In Trouble

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Some people’s opinion is that all life matters and they consider life starting at conception.
Whether they are right or wrong is irrelevant because it is still somewhat a gray area.

This does not equate to them being woman haters.

Thats some serious hyperbole projection bullshit right there.

There are women against abortion. Are they woman haters too??????

Are they????

What people will stretch and project is incredibly hilarious….
 
Why should @crandc have to figure out your pathologies for you? There are therapists who can probably help you understand why--you'll just have to pay for it yourself.

Huh? I was just attempting to get a qualification of an over-generalized assertion made by @crandc . And your assertions are absurd.
 
Last edited:
I'ts fine for people to harbor their opinions about conception and put them into practice in their own lives...that's free choice....it's not fine for them to force their opinions on the women who do not share their opinions about conception and when life begins.....then if you hear the ranting in political circles about abortion you will find a lot of men wanting to dominate the conversation and force their personal opinions on unwilling women for their own reasons.....that's essentially being a woman hater or woman bully....not these men's call to dictate laws that force their opinions on women who want to keep their options open for their own personal reasons.....these same men castrate animals to fatten them up for the grill.....where are those rights? Where is that outrage? Right.......I guess it says that God doesn't believe in the right to life for animals...just people. According to UNICEF there are 153 MILLION ORPHANS IN THE WORLD TODAY.....my opinion is that this is a much bigger problem than abortion practices People who are worried about children should focus on taking care of the 153 million unwanted babies pro life practices have created in the world......I take this subject personally as both my parents were raised as orphans during the great depression. They were able fortunately to reconnect with relatives after they turned 18
 
Last edited:
Huh? I was just attempting to get a qualification of an over-generalized assertion made by @crandc . And your assertions are absurd.

Everyone could use some therapy
 
We learn by teaching but not by cramming it down someone's throat. I'm a firm believer that you catch more ants with honey than vinegar (my grandmother's saying and she had a million of them).
Side note - My favorite grandmother saying "Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive."

upload_2021-12-12_7-54-57.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2021-12-12_7-54-57.jpeg
    upload_2021-12-12_7-54-57.jpeg
    13.4 KB · Views: 60
Look at the states with the highest levels of childhood malnutrition. Then look at the states with most restrictive anti abortion laws. Almost exact correlation. Makes sense. Those who care about children want their arrival to be a happy occasion, not a punishment for being a slut. Those who care about children want every child a wanted child. Not a forced pregnancy.
 
F.D.A. Will Permanently Allow Abortion Pills by Mail
The decision will broaden access to medication abortion, an increasingly common method, but many conservative states are already mobilizing against it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/16/health/abortion-pills-fda.html

The F.D.A.’s action means that medication abortion, an increasingly common method authorized in the United States for pregnancies up to 10 weeks’ gestation, will become more available to women who find it difficult to travel to an abortion provider or prefer to terminate a pregnancy in their homes. It allows patients to have a telemedicine appointment with a provider who can prescribe abortion pills and send them to the patient by mail.
 
Unfortunately, while FDA making medication available by mail increases access, states with antiwoman laws can still ban women from using it.

Seems harder to enforce, though, than brick-and-mortar clinics.
 
Unfortunately, while FDA making medication available by mail increases access, states with antiwoman laws can still ban women from using it.

How? If it's a mail order thing.....I mean, I wouldn't put it past some of those states to edit mail drops, test after the fact and have it reflect on health insurance etc. but if it's a secret pregnancy and the pill arrives via USPS it would be pretty hard to police unless they go full Nazi.
 
How? If it's a mail order thing.....I mean, I wouldn't put it past some of those states to edit mail drops, test after the fact and have it reflect on health insurance etc. but if it's a secret pregnancy and the pill arrives via USPS it would be pretty hard to police unless they go full Nazi.
Because it has to be prescribed. And states are making it a crime to prescribe.
Mail order improved access in that a patient can have telephone visit with doctor and pills mailed. For people outside major cities, and in Covid era, that's good. But it's not aspirin. You can't get it on Amazon.
 
Because it has to be prescribed. And states are making it a crime to prescribe.
Mail order improved access in that a patient can have telephone visit with doctor and pills mailed. For people outside major cities, and in Covid era, that's good. But it's not aspirin. You can't get it on Amazon.
Duh. Of course, I never thought of that.
 
Because it has to be prescribed. And states are making it a crime to prescribe.
Mail order improved access in that a patient can have telephone visit with doctor and pills mailed. For people outside major cities, and in Covid era, that's good. But it's not aspirin. You can't get it on Amazon.
Hopefully people in need will start ordering it from reputable Canadian and Indian companies, who will gladly ship it anywhere in the world.

Better that than being forced into having a baby you aren't ready for.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top