<div class="quote_poster">Quoting og15:</div><div class="quote_post">MrJ, don't decieve yourself, I'm a Clippers fan, and I also support the Suns, and I've seen Q through his career, it's not much of a positive to have him. Yes he has a post up game, but when you actually see him use it, call me. He's a chucker, plain and simple, he camps outside all day, and doesn't do much else. His defense is weak, and at best average, I'll give him props that he is a good rebounder, but outside of that, nothing.</div>
I know Q might be somewhat of a chucker, I didn?t deny it, but he?s definitely not like Crawford in terms of chucking. Well the Knicks aren?t that good at rebounding at the guard or forward position so he would help us in that.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">He's not an efficient scorer because he doesn't get to the line, and while he's not an inefficient shooter because he takes a lot of three's, he's also extremely inconsistent because of it. Let me just say this: He averaged 3.1 FTA PER 48 minutes, that is just absurd.</div>
I can imagine he didn?t get to the line a lot because he?s mostly outside, but is that because he was being used that way? I don?t think the Suns rely on him to do anything else.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">He's not a scorer, he's a chucker. The reason I say he's not a scorer is because you can't count on him. If his outside game isn't falling, their's not much else he'll give you. He has a big and strong body, but isn't very willing to go in the post, and he has weak handles, and isn't good at putting the ball on the floor.</div>
So basically you?re saying this guy is like Tim Thomas? I don?t live in Phoenix so I wouldn?t know everything about him but based on what I?ve seen from him, he can help the Knicks. Even if he is considered a one-dimensional shooter, why can?t that help the Knicks? Last time I checked, Allan Houston was considered a one dimensional shooter and he worked out for us fine.