OT Saudi government allegedly funded a 'dry run' for 9/11, report says

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
dviss1 said:
You ever think that most people in Hollywood are liberal and that they are pushing their own views? I don't see Clint Eastwood pushing that view. Dennis Hopper? Dennis Miller? John Wayne?

I could continue to go down the list of Hollywood celebs who are right wing...

The bolded is a fallacy.
Click to expand...

The only thing Dennis Hopper and John Wayne are pushing is daisies
 
Well if it was our government W had no idea, which doesn't suprise me because Dick Cheney was the one really running things.


20101028-george-w-bush-4-640x360.jpg

bush911.jpg
 
Last edited:
dviss1 said:
Before the towers a building hit by a plane has never pancaked either. There was nothing inside of either tower that would have cased the reported multiple explosions after the plane crashes.

There are no explanations for the many yellow thermite reactions pouring out of the building.

main-qimg-360b1d0438914945882d3ec2c7887690-c


There are no explanations on how molten steel was found at ground zero

Molten.jpg

hqdefault.jpg


Jet fuel burns at 1800 degrees. Not hot enough to melt steel.
Click to expand...

Yeah there were firefighters on scene that claim to have heard controlled explosions. And for buildings to collapse vertically down into their own footprint like that...that requires controlled explosives
 
Sometimes builders use shoddy steel....cut corners....at any cost....I don't think there's a conspiracy theory to alter the 9/11 event at all...as far as I'm concerned, we took our eye off the ball leading up to that....allowing those guys to attend flying school with no other reason for being in the states was a flag if I were to see it at the time and looking for trouble
 
Plenty of architects and engineers have come forward and said this looked like a controlled demolition. The conspiracy is we did this to get into the middle east, the American people would get behind it and so on. Hence the "Weapons of mass destruction" lie bush put out there. There never was any. I can't say i am full blown on this conspiracy but it's something to think about. On September 10th donald rumsfeld made a speech that the pentagon lost almost 3 trillion dollars worth of unaccounted for expenses, the next day, 9/11.



There is a lot to this and some things are very weird, not completely saying it didn't happen but false flags are a real thing, operation northwoods for example which is proven and we were going to attack our own US citizens and the military then blaming it on the cuban government to justify starting a war with them. That was real. So no wonder why some of us question these things. That's why you should never trust the CIA,FBI, just the government in general. So much corruption has happened, powerful people who can do powerful things and use the media to make everybody believe it
 
Cippy91 said:
Plenty of architects and engineers have come forward and said this looked like a controlled demolition. The conspiracy is we did this to get into the middle east, the American people would get behind it and so on. Hence the "Weapons of mass destruction" lie bush put out there. There never was any. I can't say i am full blown on this conspiracy but it's something to think about. On September 10th donald rumsfeld made a speech that the pentagon lost almost 3 trillion dollars worth of unaccounted for expenses, the next day, 9/11.



There is a lot to this and some things are very weird, not completely saying it didn't happen but false flags are a real thing, operation northwoods for example which is proven and we were going to attack our own US citizens and the military then blaming it on the cuban government to justify starting a war with them. That was real. So no wonder why some of us question these things. That's why you should never trust the CIA,FBI, just the government in general. So much corruption has happened, powerful people who can do powerful things and use the media to make everybody believe it
Click to expand...


This is what I am talking about. Using the attack to disappear 3 trillion in expenses...thats a culpable reason...i've heard the section that got bombed...i mean that the plane crashed into, contained mainframes with the information regarding those 3 trillion in expenses, now destroyed so convienently.
 
Last edited:
Chris Craig said:
This is what I am talking about. Using the attack to disappear 3 trillion in expenses...thats a culpable reason.
Click to expand...

That's the silliest theory yet. So we are supposed to believe that they $2.3T disappeared, so they announced that and then arranged 9/11 the next day to distract from the announcement?

Wouldn't it have been so much simpler to just not announce the missing money?

Edit: and the money isn't missing anyway, Rumsfeld was just saying their accounting system sucked:

The technology revolution has transformed organizations across the private sector, but not ours, not fully, not yet. We are, as they say, tangled in our anchor chain. Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible.
Click to expand...

barfo
 
barfo said:
That's the silliest theory yet. So we are supposed to believe that they $2.3T disappeared, so they announced that and then arranged 9/11 the next day to distract from the announcement?

Wouldn't it have been so much simpler to just not announce the missing money?

barfo
Click to expand...

Good point
 
I don't know that the government planned and carried out 9\11, it is interesting to consider though. Trying to keep an open mind. I do think the government used 9/11 to attack Iraq to steal their oil. Iraq had nothing to do eith 9/11. They had no WMD'S. We should have sent all of our forces to afhganastan. Perhaps we eould have caught Osama sooner.
 
Cippy91 said:
The people you just named, how great are there careers compared to the ones pushing the super left view? I'm sure some definitely believe in it but there are also some who have to fake it to make it. They wanna make actin movies, within them they are blasting everybody then they wanna talk to us about gun control. People like Rogen wanna make these comedies with words they then say you shouldn't use. Look how many celebrities endorsed Hillary even though the people of this country knew they couldn't trust her
Click to expand...

Clint Eastwood is an Oscar winner.

But anyway, who cares about their careers and what they're doing? That doesn't mean much. Saying all of Hollywood is liberal is just like saying all Trump voters are racist.

They're not.
 
Chris Craig said:
While there are a handful or two of conservative people in hollywood, the majority do seem to be pushing liberal views.
Click to expand...

Search the list you might be surprised.

Adam Sandler? Yup. Never woulda thought.
 
dviss1 said:
Search the list you might be surprised.

Adam Sandler? Yup. Never woulda thought.
Click to expand...

Im not saying they are all liberals
 
Chris Craig said:
Thats ridiculous mountains get big because of plate tectonics and the rising of molten magma from the earths core

Alternatively they are big because God made them that way...err @SlyPokerDog made them that way
Click to expand...
No no no no. Mountain tops are where the crust of the Earth was. All of HCP's ancestors started life on those peaks. As they ventured out they pushed the surrounding land down.

I bet you did not know that, schools these days. SMH
 
I lived near the Malakoff Diggings in the Sierras for a while....looks like the moon from the gold rush flumes and water cannons...mountains can be blasted
gold rush.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top