OT School shooting in California (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Criminals are by definition something you always legislate against - and it never works 100% - otherwise there would not be any criminals.

It is always about common sense - making it harder to get the resources for criminal activity.

Not sure what you mean...do you mean more gun control?
 
Id say we need to investigate the mindset that makes teens think this is okay over the access to such weapons. The weapons aren't going away, but mindset can be changed, turned from negative to positive. What is making the kids feel so negative, depressive? This should be the focal point of investigating, not the access of weapons.


General statement: Weapons have been around since the beginning of time. They will not go away. To focus on hand gun proliferation in this country would be a futile effort only resulting in complete chaos and civil war.

Focus on the psychology and sociology that is warping our youths' minds.


I believe that we can probably predict people who will be of the shooter mindset via psychological tests. If those aren't available now, you can probably develop tests and administer them.

Then you isolate those individuals or watch them more carefully.
 
I believe that we can probably predict people who will be of the shooter mindset via psychological tests. If those aren't available now, you can probably develop tests and administer them.

Then you isolate those individuals or watch them more carefully.

I think it would also help if the warning signs that are often on facebook/twitter et al, would send up red flags and that those flags were reported.

fwiw, facebook/twitter et al, are the devil
 
Id say we need to investigate the mindset that makes teens think this is okay over the access to such weapons. The weapons aren't going away, but mindset can be changed, turned from negative to positive. What is making the kids feel so negative, depressive? This should be the focal point of investigating, not the access of weapons.


General statement: Weapons have been around since the beginning of time. They will not go away. To focus on hand gun proliferation in this country would be a futile effort only resulting in complete chaos and civil war.

Focus on the psychology and sociology that is warping our youths' minds.

ugh
 
You don't think a person's mental state is what prompts them to kill?

I think the planet equally distributes mentally unstable people, but one country in particular seems to have an infatuation with weapons and it's citizens "god given" rights to have them, and has school shootings more than anywhere else. So we have multiple issues and ALL need to be addressed. Unfortunately I feel like I have stated this a dozen times because we keep having fucking school shootings. We need more school security, we need more mental health at the adolescent level continuing through early adulthood, we need locks on doors, barriers, we need all of that AND we need better gun regulations, cutting out loopholes, gun shows, private sales, types of guns - AR15s etc banned - all of it. I would love to treat every person with a mental disorder, and we should. But IN THE MEANTIME maybe we can put some things in place that doesnt make it so goddamn easy and available. And this goes for all guns. Which is why the gun owner needs to have the fear of god in him that if he doesnt know where his sweet precious gun is and it gets stolen he is fucked, will go to prison and lose everything.
 
I think the planet equally distributes mentally unstable people, but one country in particular seems to have an infatuation with weapons and it's citizens "god given" rights to have them, and has school shootings more than anywhere else. So we have multiple issues and ALL need to be addressed. Unfortunately I feel like I have stated this a dozen times because we keep having fucking school shootings. We need more school security, we need more mental health at the adolescent level continuing through early adulthood, we need locks on doors, barriers, we need all of that AND we need better gun regulations, cutting out loopholes, gun shows, private sales, types of guns - AR15s etc banned - all of it. I would love to treat every person with a mental disorder, and we should. But IN THE MEANTIME maybe we can put some things in place that doesnt make it so goddamn easy and available. And this goes for all guns. Which is why the gun owner needs to have the fear of god in him that if he doesnt know where his sweet precious gun is and it gets stolen he is fucked, will go to prison and lose everything.
I am with you, at least partially once you get into punishing people for having a crime committed against them then that's where I veer off, but to each their own I suppose. It's like you're a criminal because someone else committed a crime against you. That same sort of argument doesn't work anywhere else, why should it work here? It's like blaming a girl for being pretty when they get raped or blaming a Black person for being black and getting lynched. You cannot IMO treat people who are victims of a crime as though they are the criminal.
 
To clarify to me what you're essentially saying is we want to create a list of people who have a target on their backs because they carry a gun or own one. Now that we have a list of them for people to target, essentially if a crime is committed against them, then they're essentially criminals now. You're basically criminalizing people for what they own. Which is I suppose "fine" if you want to just say "ban all guns", but just in essence a law that says you're a criminal if someone shoots you takes your gun and shoots someone else, that is a slippery slope...
 
As long as killing is framed as entertainment for young developing minds all it will take for a hormonal teen to snap could be a bully, a lover leaving, any number of insecurities...teens usually don't handle trauma well or stress. Not saying adults do but a 15-16 year old snapping could happen in a nano second ...not everyone is well adjusted to begin with ...if theres a gun around and ammo then gun control isn't working for this kid....access is too easy. No teen should need to own a hand gun for any reason in my view. I didn't allow it around as a parent.
 
To clarify to me what you're essentially saying is we want to create a list of people who have a target on their backs because they carry a gun or own one. Now that we have a list of them for people to target, essentially if a crime is committed against them, then they're essentially criminals now. You're basically criminalizing people for what they own. Which is I suppose "fine" if you want to just say "ban all guns", but just in essence a law that says you're a criminal if someone shoots you takes your gun and shoots someone else, that is a slippery slope...

I don’t follow the list part. I am saying that guns are registered to the owner. If one day that gun gets taken from the home and used to mow down some 8th graders, that gun owner has life in prison. It’s not a huge deal. If someone uses the gun in a robbery, the owner gets charged with a felony robbery.
These aren’t crazy. And there have been instances when a kid takes dads gun and the dad gets in trouble. Not enough.
So, for guns that are stolen, well, how does it get stolen if it’s safely locked away unless the owner is carrying it. If he’s carrying it legally, and he gets mugged, he would call the police and there would be a report. He’d be only partially responsible.
 
I don’t follow the list part. I am saying that guns are registered to the owner. If one day that gun gets taken from the home and used to mow down some 8th graders, that gun owner has life in prison. It’s not a huge deal. If someone uses the gun in a robbery, the owner gets charged with a felony robbery.
These aren’t crazy. And there have been instances when a kid takes dads gun and the dad gets in trouble. Not enough.
So, for guns that are stolen, well, how does it get stolen if it’s safely locked away unless the owner is carrying it. If he’s carrying it legally, and he gets mugged, he would call the police and there would be a report. He’d be only partially responsible.

There have been over 2,000,000 guns that were reported stolen in the last 10 years...and that does not account for the ones that were not reported.
 
As long as killing is framed as entertainment for young developing minds all it will take for a hormonal teen to snap could be a bully, a lover leaving, any number of insecurities...teens usually don't handle trauma well or stress. Not saying adults do but a 15-16 year old snapping could happen in a nano second ...not everyone is well adjusted to begin with ...if theres a gun around and ammo then gun control isn't working for this kid....access is too easy. No teen should need to own a hand gun for any reason in my view. I didn't allow it around as a parent.


Thank you.
 
I think the planet equally distributes mentally unstable people, but one country in particular seems to have an infatuation with weapons and it's citizens "god given" rights to have them, and has school shootings more than anywhere else. So we have multiple issues and ALL need to be addressed. Unfortunately I feel like I have stated this a dozen times because we keep having fucking school shootings. We need more school security, we need more mental health at the adolescent level continuing through early adulthood, we need locks on doors, barriers, we need all of that AND we need better gun regulations, cutting out loopholes, gun shows, private sales, types of guns - AR15s etc banned - all of it. I would love to treat every person with a mental disorder, and we should. But IN THE MEANTIME maybe we can put some things in place that doesnt make it so goddamn easy and available. And this goes for all guns. Which is why the gun owner needs to have the fear of god in him that if he doesnt know where his sweet precious gun is and it gets stolen he is fucked, will go to prison and lose everything.

Well, like I've asked/alluded to before, how do you account for the disproportionate number of incidents in the US as opposed to other countries?

But it is however, that you finally admit there are other factors out there other than gun laws alone.
 
So, what we should do is make it much harder for them to get access to tools of destruction.

And how do you propose to do that?

If a person wants a gun, the law will not stop him from getting one. And the fact that there are ways to acquire a firearm illegally as opposed to legally has been proven over and over partly because the people who sell them illegally don't care about the law because, well, they're criminals.
 
Wait a minute, we were talking about stopping "criminals" from acquiring weapons, not the average Joe.

That's a problem when they become criminal after the fact - as happened with this kid. If it was harder for this kid to gain access to the gun - there is a good chance this tragedy would not have happened.
 
And how do you propose to do that?

If a person wants a gun, the law will not stop him from getting one. And the fact that there are ways to acquire a firearm illegally as opposed to legally has been proven over and over partly because the people who sell them illegally don't care about the law because, well, they're criminals.

The issue in this case, it sounds like, was that the owner got it legally - but his son had access to the gun because it was not protected properly. So, a good place to start is to have gun registration and ownership responsibility - with the need to report guns stolen as one does with cars.

Clearly, guns are too easy to get access to in this country - and there is no meaningful legislation to proper handling and care of said guns. I am certain that if there are laws that keep responsibility with the registered owners - there is a good chance guns will be better handled and kept out of the hands of minors like in this case.

It is not going to solve all the instances, but it should help to solve some.
 
That's a problem when they become criminal after the fact - as happened with this kid. If it was harder for this kid to gain access to the gun - there is a good chance this tragedy would not have happened.


No, I think you are completely missing what I'm referring to....I'm talking about the "criminals" who sell weapons illegally to whoever is willing to pay for them.
 
No, I think you are completely missing what I'm referring to....I'm talking about the "criminals" who sell weapons illegally to whoever is willing to pay for them.

It's entirely reasonable to assume that I missed something coming mid-discussion. If we are taking about the people the sell guns illegally - other than increasing the punishment for this crime hoping it acts as a deterrent - not much you can do with legal tools, I would agree to that.
 
The issue in this case, it sounds like, was that the owner got it legally - but his son had access to the gun because it was not protected properly. So, a good place to start is to have gun registration and ownership responsibility - with the need to report guns stolen as one does with cars.

Clearly, guns are too easy to get access to in this country - and there is no meaningful legislation to proper handling and care of said guns. I am certain that if there are laws that keep responsibility with the registered owners - there is a good chance guns will be better handled and kept out of the hands of minors like in this case.

It is not going to solve all the instances, but it should help to solve some.

Like I pointed out earlier, there are over 350,000,000 guns in the US and over 2,000,000 that have been reported stolen in the last 10 years, not counting the one that were not reported stolen.

I still contend that the main problem is not so much with the availability of guns but instead the people who are the emotionally/mentally bankrupt individuals who were prompted by the demons in their heads to commit these horrible crimes. The huge discrepancy between these type crimes in the US as opposed to other countries also with a large number of firearms is IMO, predicated on differences in culture.
 
Mandatory buyback of assault weapons is a no brainier. The main culture problem we have is with the people that are against that.

Less guns = less deaths.
 
It's entirely reasonable to assume that I missed something coming mid-discussion. If we are taking about the people the sell guns illegally - other than increasing the punishment for this crime hoping it acts as a deterrent - not much you can do with legal tools, I would agree to that.

Yeah, but them SOBs already don't give a rip...many of them have already spent much of their lives behind bars and don't really mind if they are sent back to jail or not.

IMO, part of the problem is that prisons are too nice....meals, TV, internet, medical care, etc. all for free with no work required,...bring back the old chain gangs as far as I'm concerned.
 
Mandatory buyback of assault weapons is a no brainier. The main culture problem we have is with the people that are against that.

Less guns = less deaths.

The youngster who created yesterday's scenario used a hand gun, not an assault rifle.

And how would we enforce a "mandatory buyback"?
 
The youngster who created yesterday's scenario used a hand gun, not an assault rifle.

And how would we enforce a "mandatory buyback"?

Fines would be the easy way. After a certain point I wouldn't be against more severe punishment. People who refused would indeed be criminals.
 
Mandatory buyback of assault weapons is a no brainier. The main culture problem we have is with the people that are against that.

Less guns = less deaths.

Mass shootings are a very small percentage of gun deaths.

Assault weapons are used in a very small percentage of gun deaths.

The biggest target should be unregistered guns, stolen guns and increasing penalties for possession.

I advocate a military taskforce be used to track illegals guns and get them off the street.

Mandatory minimums for posession of illegal guns.

Assault weapons are fine if they only are given to the most qualified. All guns should be handled like that.

Only the supremely qualified and vetted.
 
Fines would be the easy way. After a certain point I wouldn't be against more severe punishment. People who refused would indeed be criminals.

OK, I'll bite. Exactly how can you determine who may have illegal/banned weapons if they never turn them in? And fines don't stop people from speeding or driving drunk, etc.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top