brooklynballer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 706
- Likes
- 1,072
- Points
- 93
Disagree 100%. Shooting 35ft 3-pointers is never a good shot irrespective of what Dame thinks.Unless he made that shot, then it was good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Disagree 100%. Shooting 35ft 3-pointers is never a good shot irrespective of what Dame thinks.Unless he made that shot, then it was good.
That's one theory. I'm not going to bash on Stevens, he's a great coach. I don't think Stevens could take this Portland roster past the WCF though.
Disagree 100%. Shooting 35ft 3-pointers is never a good shot irrespective of what Dame thinks.
You think Stotts can?
Disagree 100%. Shooting 35ft 3-pointers is never a good shot irrespective of what Dame thinks.
Boston has a more talented team than Portland, only Blazer fans would think otherwise.
Boston's roster is way more vertsitile and allows Stevens a ton of flexibility. Stevens is a fantastic coach too.
Scott’s said the plan was to take a three and Dame just made a reaction play.
He shoots a high percentage of those.
Was this a good shot?
He was +3, so by definition he didn't cost us the game.He cost us the game
Dame went on his run with Whiteside setting screens for him.Doesn't surprise me to see Melo -13, but Nurk was also -13. Meanwhile Whiteside was +9.
So, then Boston should have won by a lot more right?
I agree that Stevens is a great coach
Much better than Stotts. I think that's the biggest difference.
Way to throw Dame under the bus.Scott’s said the plan was to take a three and Dame just made a reaction play.
I'd take Stevens over Stotts any day
So, then Boston should have won by a lot more right?
I agree that Stevens is a great coach
Much better than Stotts. I think that's the biggest difference.
He shoots a high percentage of those.
Was this a good shot?
Doesn't surprise me to see Melo -13, but Nurk was also -13. Meanwhile Whiteside was +9. Weird.
Hezonja crashed and burned with a -16.
That's easy: become a Celtics fan. Upside: you get to feel happy today.I'd take Stevens over Stotts any day
Dame went on his run with Whiteside setting screens for him.
We're not in the game without him. He did choke but that doesn't cancel out everything he did to get us in position to win. This should be obvious.He cost us the game
Not something he's known for...Dame went on his run with Whiteside setting screens for him.
Way to throw Dame under the bus.
Tragedy was that Marcus Smart slipped and Dame was pretty open, too.
It makes sense when you watched the game. Whiteside was in the stretch where we got back into the game becauseDoesn't surprise me to see Melo -13, but Nurk was also -13. Meanwhile Whiteside was +9. Weird.
Hezonja crashed and burned with a -16.
You would have ROASTED him if he missed a three there.I’d rather lillard chuck a stupid 3 then take the 2
NO! Dame shoots a better % 43, from deep, than he does at the line. Check your factsNo, that was a terrible shot. It’s only considered a “good” shot because it went in. And I don’t give a shit what Dames %age is from 30ft+. If he shot more from the actual three point line instead of 5-10 feet beyond it, his %age would be much better imo.