Nikolokolus
There's always next year
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,704
- Likes
- 6,198
- Points
- 113
Look, I'm viewed as a charter member of the Blake Hate Club, but I see almost identical statistics here.
One is viewed as a disappointing, yet up-and-coming PG with some potential who just hasn't broken out yet. (IIRC he's 21)
One just had by almost all accounts a career year, and is 29 with 6 years experience in the league.
On the surface you might think they have identical stats, but Conley post-Ivaroni blew up, going for 16/6 to close out the year. But If you want to see the real difference you have to dig a little deeper.
Mike Conley advanced stats
Shot breakdown:
Jumpers: 68% EFG% .495 ASTD: 49%
Close: 32% EFG% .509 ASTD: 16%
Draw Foul Rate: 9.1%
3PT/2PT ratio 29% of total FGAs were 3s
Steve Blake advanced stats
Shot Breakdown:
Jumpers: 88% EFG% .541 ASTD: 71%
Close: 12% EFG% .500 ASTD: 38%
Draw Foul Rate: 2.3%
3PT/2PT ratio: 51% of FGAs were 3s
So looking at the two players my question to you is, which one looks like a point guard and which one looks like a 3 point set shot specialist ie. a shooting guard you bring in off the bench?
