Disclaimer--this post will be TL;DR.
The sentiment of frustration about Stotts going all out to try to win every game has nothing to do (for most people) with draft position. It has to do with bringing out secondary players ability to contribute meaningfully.
Imagine if we spent five games--just five--primarily running offensive sets designed to get shots for Leonard, Vonleh, Harkless, and Plumlee. If CJ and Dame took a backseat for those five games and sought primarily to use their playmaking abilities to get secondary scorers hitting on all cylinders.
Would we lose all five games? Probably. But could it help break Meyers out of his slump? Maybe. Could Vonleh figure out how to be involved and engaged in the offense on a game to game basis? Theoretically. Could it bring Harkless back to the land of the living? Possibly. Could it cause defenses to pay more attention to Plumlee in the past, thereby opening up a little space for everyone else? Perhaps.
My concern, and the concern of many others, is that the potential growth and development of several players on the team may be being stunted by the apparent win-every-game mentality that leads to Dame and CJ taking half of the team's shots. I'd love to see Stotts encourage them defer more to the secondary and tertiary players to see who might actually step up in expanded roles, because that would likely be beneficial to the franchise in the long term.