Politics SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTED!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
MarAzul said:
Whoa! You seem to be overloaded with something but it ain't smarts.
Click to expand...
So I'm not smart.....piss off mate ....Trump isn't smart enough to handle a former head of the KGB....yeah, that's a real stretch on my part eh?
 
Speaking of incompetence...of 557 vacant govt positions. Trump has only 57 nominations....about twice as many as golf trips so far
 
Further said:
And look how well that is working out for him. Now multiply the response several fold, and you might be nearing what a Flynn pardon would have led too. Even Trump must have realized the bomb he'd be dropping with a Flynn pardoning verses firing of s man most Dems and Repubs at some point have been against.
Click to expand...

I think it would have been far less an issue. Democrats claim Comey was (almost singlehandedly!) investigating Trump himself.
 
riverman said:
Speaking of incompetence...of 557 vacant govt positions. Trump has only 57 nominations....about twice as many as golf trips so far
Click to expand...

Bill Clinton did the same thing. He didn't hire for shitloads of government vacancies when he took office. How'd that turn out? Balanced budget!
 
Denny Crane said:
I think it would have been far less an issue. Democrats claim Comey was (almost singlehandedly!) investigating Trump himself.
Click to expand...
We don't know, so we can't prove which would have resulted in a larger outcry. I think it's Flynn being pardoned but we can't know. However, we do know from multiple leaks Trump was shocked about how vigorous the reaction was for Firing Comey, a person Trump believed all the Dems hated and wanted to see fired anyways. I think a Flynn firing would have been easier for Trump to predict a backlash from. But this is all speculation.
 
Geez! The dummy has drummed up a few hundred billion in business from the same guys Obama was crapping on.
My old buddies at Lockheed will love this not smart enough bumble.
 
MarAzul said:
Geez! The dummy has drummed up a few hundred billion in business from the same guys Obama was crapping on.
My old buddies at Lockheed will love this not smart enough bumble.
Click to expand...

Sure, selling more arms to the middle east is always a great idea. What could possibly go wrong?

barfo
 
What does a "Special Counsel" accomplish?

In the short term.

Take the heat off Congressmen that want to wail about impeachment without the need to answer to their voters.

In the Long Term.

Nothing.
Congress still would need to do the impeaching.

What will the loud mouth corps do when the Nothingburger is served?
Ha! That will be funny.
 
Incredible that Trump has to put up with this crap! Has anyone ever seen anything close?
He just hired the guy in the Justice department and then he issues some crap like this!

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiIyqeVl__TAhUO32MKHTtWCYMQFggwMAI&url=https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download&usg=AFQjCNFRQ0XcXN_ZXBpbvWllB10Qr_wmGQ

It is nothing other than an open ended authorization for a Witch hunt.

Trump should fire the lot of them and force Congress to abide by the Constitution.
Call out Ryan and Pelosi personally. Put up or shut the fuck up.
Where are your two witnesses?
 
MarAzul said:
Incredible that Trump has to put up with this crap! Has anyone ever seen anything close?
Click to expand...

Yes. Ken Starr's investigation of Bill Clinton. But you denounced that one too, right?

Where are your two witnesses?
Click to expand...

I don't think witnesses will be that hard to come by.

barfo
 
MarAzul said:
Not a damn thing. I hope we sell 50 other countries an Anti Missile System.
Perhaps not N. Korea, Iran or Syria.
Click to expand...

Anti-missile systems aren't the issue here. What Trump agreed to sell them, that Obama previously didn't, was precision guided missiles which they are likely to use against factions in Yemen that we support.

barfo
 
barfo said:
I don't think witnesses will be that hard to come by.
Click to expand...

Well there were witnesses and complaint of harm when Star was sicked on Clinton. When it progressed to the Blue dress, it was an abuse of the American people as well as Bill.

This is a little different. No witness, no crime articulated, no lawsuit by the aggrieved. Just a witch hunt authorized to take the heat off the only people answerable to the people, Congressmen.
Trump has not be served well by the Justice Dept. people he appointed. That is for sure his error.
 
MarAzul said:
Trump represents me and the United States of America. So who do you have in your pocket to make a we?
Click to expand...

I've got something in my pocket that can definitely make a wee.

barfo
 
MarAzul said:
Trump has not be served well by the Justice Dept. people he appointed. That is for sure his error.
Click to expand...

Yeah, well, he promised to appoint "the best" people. Instead he appointed hacks and cronies. What did you expect?

barfo
 
MarAzul said:
Who among you supports an investigation into the President without a charge being made?

Even if he colluded with the Russians, what is the crime? Since foreign policy is the responsibility of the Chief Executive, I think he can collude with whom ever the hell he wants.
Click to expand...
A candidate colluding with a foreign power to try and tip an election in their favor would be pretty much the text book definition of treason.

So, I'm all for an investigation, and if it gets to the bottom of everything and finds out there is no evidence of such collusion and they don't file charges against Trump, then that's a perfectly legitimate outcome.
 
Nikolokolus said:
A candidate colluding with a foreign power to try and tip an election
Click to expand...

Naw! here is a definition of treason.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

You have zero evidence, and forget about TWO witnesses. You may have a few fucking fools pulling accusations out their ass, but that's life in the City. You do know we are not at war with Russia? I remember when we were for all practical purposes, but this ain't it.

Sound like you advocate sedition and love open ended fishing trips, even witch hunting.
 
MarAzul said:
Naw! here is a definition of treason.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

You have zero evidence, and forget about TWO witnesses.
Click to expand...

Since you keep bringing up the number of witnesses, I guess you think that he's guilty of treason but there aren't enough witnesses for a conviction?

Sound like you advocate sedition
Click to expand...

You are right, it may be easier to convict Trump of sedition.

and love open ended fishing trips, even witch hunting.
Click to expand...

And long walks on the beach, and puppies, and candlelight dinners. Swipe right on my picture.

barfo
 
barfo said:
you keep bringing up the number of witnesses
Click to expand...

barfo said:
You are right, it may be easier to convict Trump of sedition.
Click to expand...

No barf, not bringing it up, just posting a copy of that section of the Constitution so you guys don't have to pull guesses out you backside.

Yeah! That make sense on sedition!!! err perhaps you best look it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top