Politics SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTED!

[riverman]

Whoa! You seem to be overloaded with something but it ain't smarts.

So I'm not smart.....piss off mate ....Trump isn't smart enough to handle a former head of the KGB....yeah, that's a real stretch on my part eh?

 

[riverman]

Speaking of incompetence...of 557 vacant govt positions. Trump has only 57 nominations....about twice as many as golf trips so far

 

[Denny Crane]

And look how well that is working out for him. Now multiply the response several fold, and you might be nearing what a Flynn pardon would have led too. Even Trump must have realized the bomb he'd be dropping with a Flynn pardoning verses firing of s man most Dems and Repubs at some point have been against.

I think it would have been far less an issue. Democrats claim Comey was (almost singlehandedly!) investigating Trump himself.

 

[Denny Crane]

Speaking of incompetence...of 557 vacant govt positions. Trump has only 57 nominations....about twice as many as golf trips so far

Bill Clinton did the same thing. He didn't hire for shitloads of government vacancies when he took office. How'd that turn out? Balanced budget!

 

[Further]

I think it would have been far less an issue. Democrats claim Comey was (almost singlehandedly!) investigating Trump himself.

We don't know, so we can't prove which would have resulted in a larger outcry. I think it's Flynn being pardoned but we can't know. However, we do know from multiple leaks Trump was shocked about how vigorous the reaction was for Firing Comey, a person Trump believed all the Dems hated and wanted to see fired anyways. I think a Flynn firing would have been easier for Trump to predict a backlash from. But this is all speculation.

 

[MarAzul]

piss off mate

 

[MarAzul]

Geez! The dummy has drummed up a few hundred billion in business from the same guys Obama was crapping on.
My old buddies at Lockheed will love this not smart enough bumble.

 

[barfo]

Geez! The dummy has drummed up a few hundred billion in business from the same guys Obama was crapping on.
My old buddies at Lockheed will love this not smart enough bumble.

Sure, selling more arms to the middle east is always a great idea. What could possibly go wrong?

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

What could possibly go wrong?

Not a damn thing. I hope we sell 50 other countries an Anti Missile System.
Perhaps not N. Korea, Iran or Syria.

 

[MarAzul]

What does a "Special Counsel" accomplish?

In the short term.

Take the heat off Congressmen that want to wail about impeachment without the need to answer to their voters.

In the Long Term.

Nothing.
Congress still would need to do the impeaching.

What will the loud mouth corps do when the Nothingburger is served?
Ha! That will be funny.

 

[MarAzul]

Incredible that Trump has to put up with this crap! Has anyone ever seen anything close?
He just hired the guy in the Justice department and then he issues some crap like this!

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiIyqeVl__TAhUO32MKHTtWCYMQFggwMAI&url=https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download&usg=AFQjCNFRQ0XcXN_ZXBpbvWllB10Qr_wmGQ

It is nothing other than an open ended authorization for a Witch hunt.

Trump should fire the lot of them and force Congress to abide by the Constitution.
Call out Ryan and Pelosi personally. Put up or shut the fuck up.
Where are your two witnesses?

 

[barfo]

Incredible that Trump has to put up with this crap! Has anyone ever seen anything close?

Yes. Ken Starr's investigation of Bill Clinton. But you denounced that one too, right?

Where are your two witnesses?

I don't think witnesses will be that hard to come by.

barfo

 

[barfo]

Not a damn thing. I hope we sell 50 other countries an Anti Missile System.
Perhaps not N. Korea, Iran or Syria.

Anti-missile systems aren't the issue here. What Trump agreed to sell them, that Obama previously didn't, was precision guided missiles which they are likely to use against factions in Yemen that we support.

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

we

We includes you and who?

 

[barfo]

We includes you and who?

The United States of America. Not Russia.

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

I don't think witnesses will be that hard to come by.

Well there were witnesses and complaint of harm when Star was sicked on Clinton. When it progressed to the Blue dress, it was an abuse of the American people as well as Bill.

This is a little different. No witness, no crime articulated, no lawsuit by the aggrieved. Just a witch hunt authorized to take the heat off the only people answerable to the people, Congressmen.
Trump has not be served well by the Justice Dept. people he appointed. That is for sure his error.

 

[MarAzul]

The United States of America. Not Russia.

barfo

Trump represents me and the United States of America. So who do you have in your pocket to make a we?

 

[barfo]

Trump represents me and the United States of America. So who do you have in your pocket to make a we?

I've got something in my pocket that can definitely make a wee.

barfo

 

[barfo]

Trump has not be served well by the Justice Dept. people he appointed. That is for sure his error.

Yeah, well, he promised to appoint "the best" people. Instead he appointed hacks and cronies. What did you expect?

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

I've got something in my pocket that can definitely make a wee.

barfo

As I suspected.

 

[MarAzul]

What did you expect?

Fire the mistakes and Carry on.

 

[barfo]

Fire the mistakes and Carry on.

How will he be able to carry on after firing his entire staff?

barfo

 

[riverman]

How will he be able to carry on after firing his entire staff?

barfo

twitter, potato chips and Fox News...it's how he plans to govern

 

[MarAzul]

Who is correct Dershowitz or Rasta and Barfo? Do Rasta and barfo make a we?
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017...purpose-of-special-counsel-what-is-the-crime/
Let the people you vote for off the hook?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/...nsel-role-correct-it-could-cover-the-problems
What crime?
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017...purpose-of-special-counsel-what-is-the-crime/
No Crime!
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/05/...s-russia-special-counsel-says-theres-no-crime

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Marazul is old enough to remember when it was called a retarded council.

 

[Nikolokolus]

Who among you supports an investigation into the President without a charge being made?

Even if he colluded with the Russians, what is the crime? Since foreign policy is the responsibility of the Chief Executive, I think he can collude with whom ever the hell he wants.

A candidate colluding with a foreign power to try and tip an election in their favor would be pretty much the text book definition of treason.

So, I'm all for an investigation, and if it gets to the bottom of everything and finds out there is no evidence of such collusion and they don't file charges against Trump, then that's a perfectly legitimate outcome.

 

[MarAzul]

A candidate colluding with a foreign power to try and tip an election

Naw! here is a definition of treason.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

You have zero evidence, and forget about TWO witnesses. You may have a few fucking fools pulling accusations out their ass, but that's life in the City. You do know we are not at war with Russia? I remember when we were for all practical purposes, but this ain't it.

Sound like you advocate sedition and love open ended fishing trips, even witch hunting.

 

[MarAzul]

Marazul is old enough to remember when it was called a retarded council.

Are you sure it isn't, old enough not to remember?

 

[barfo]

Naw! here is a definition of treason.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

You have zero evidence, and forget about TWO witnesses.

Since you keep bringing up the number of witnesses, I guess you think that he's guilty of treason but there aren't enough witnesses for a conviction?

Sound like you advocate sedition

You are right, it may be easier to convict Trump of sedition.

and love open ended fishing trips, even witch hunting.

And long walks on the beach, and puppies, and candlelight dinners. Swipe right on my picture.

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

you keep bringing up the number of witnesses

You are right, it may be easier to convict Trump of sedition.

No barf, not bringing it up, just posting a copy of that section of the Constitution so you guys don't have to pull guesses out you backside.

Yeah! That make sense on sedition!!! err perhaps you best look it up.