Entity
some guy
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2008
- Messages
- 1,761
- Likes
- 25
- Points
- 48
Also, can someone explain how we will just waive Blake/Outlaw?
http://hoopshype.com/salaries/portland.htm
Their contracts for 2009-10 are non-guaranteed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, can someone explain how we will just waive Blake/Outlaw?
http://hoopshype.com/salaries/portland.htm
Are you going to figure out that players can be traded in the summer and what being under the cap means in that instance, or are you just going to continue to look like a fool?
Under the current economics of the NBA, RLEC's contract is worth its weight in gold. Now its just worth some cap space...nothing more.

So let's assume it's maybe twenty pages of 8X14 legal paper ... that's roughly 3 or 4 ounces, with gold currently trading at $976 an ounce, meaning his contract is worth about $3000-$4000? Sounds about right to me.![]()
OK, what targets do you see then. Yes, I know that players can be traded in the summer.
It's not worth discussing with you at this point since you have been wrong on many levels all day. Besides, I am happy with watching the current roster fight for a playoff spot. Get back to me after you're up to speed after the season.
yes massa, right away massa.
so suddenly the Summer 09 plan is "we'll just see what happens when we get there?"
what a crock of shit. the summer 09 was the justification for the ZBO trade as it was going to be huge....now that its upon us, there's no knockout free agents and the cap space is transparent at best.
so suddenly the Summer 09 plan is "we'll just see what happens when we get there?"
what a crock of shit. the summer 09 was the justification for the ZBO trade as it was going to be huge....now that its upon us, there's no knockout free agents and the cap space is transparent at best.
Ahhhh.
Okay. Now I see why you're so upset. You didn't like the Randolph deal (which I knew), but you're connecting this to that deal due to the claim that we'd have cap space thanks to that deal. So this all goes back to the Randolph deal.
Well, I actually didn't like the Randolph deal, either, and never really believed that the cap space would materialize into much (since it rarely does). I actually thought I might end up wrong due to the confluence of cap space and a bad economy, but I'm back to not being very optimistic about that.
Still, I think Pritchard can get something useful in trade...not using cap space as the only value, but combining cap space with a useful player or two and maybe a draft pick.
Anyway, I actually agree with you in a limited sense on the Randolph deal, but bear in mind that the main benefit of it wasn't Frye or cap space but Rudy Fernandez.
Ahhhh.
Okay. Now I see why you're so upset. You didn't like the Randolph deal (which I knew), but you're connecting this to that deal due to the claim that we'd have cap space thanks to that deal. So this all goes back to the Randolph deal.
Well, I actually didn't like the Randolph deal, either, and never really believed that the cap space would materialize into much (since it rarely does). I actually thought I might end up wrong due to the confluence of cap space and a bad economy, but I'm back to not being very optimistic about that.
Still, I think Pritchard can get something useful in trade...not using cap space as the only value, but combining cap space with a useful player or two and maybe a draft pick.
Anyway, I actually agree with you in a limited sense on the Randolph deal, but bear in mind that the main benefit of it wasn't Frye or cap space but Rudy Fernandez.
SO:
List of possible Targets:
PG: Ramon Sessions
SG: None
SF: Josh Childress
PF: David Lee
C: None
anything else?
bingo.
The main benefit was getting rid of a black hole/locker room cancer. Last I saw the guy coldcocked a player in the face as his crappy team was losing by 40 to the Suns.
So is this outburst some sort of repressed anti-KP release that you've been holding on to since Zach was traded?
more the false promises of unlimited cap space as was being promoted by posters at the time.
Grant Hill (a worse version of PDX Pippen?)
I like Milsap, Ariza and on a lesser level, Bibby and Andre Miller. Charlie V might be a good backup PF for us.
Yes, but how much money would you be willing to spend on those players?
i'd spend money on milsap, but not much on the rest at all.
Significantly worse, but interesting comp. However, Pippen was brought in as the last piece to a veteran team. Hill would be too out of phase with the team's window, I think. A "Pippen acquisition" would make sense in 5-6 years, hopefully after the team already has a title or two in the bank and is looking for veteran reinforcements.
For a backup? Really?
I don't think we'll be making a big FA splash, personally. Now that the dreams of Rjeff or Crash are gone, I'll likely be more in the camp of developing Martell as the starter at the 3 and then fill some of our other needs (handle the point guard position rotation properly and get a backup 4).
I like Milsap's game too and think it'll be good to have him as a backup PF, which we do need. some toughness down low at that position.
I think this summer we'll be looking more at "glue" guys than "impact" guys.
guys like Shane Battier (that type of player, not him specifically). Some upgrades in the basketball IQ department to calm the younger players down a bit. someone like Matt Barnes would be pretty nice...
6 Million for a backup to one of our stars = BAD.
I think he'd get better offers anyways. He deserves to start.
I think this summer we'll be looking more at "glue" guys than "impact" guys.
guys like Shane Battier (that type of player, not him specifically). Some upgrades in the basketball IQ department to calm the younger players down a bit. someone like Matt Barnes would be pretty nice...

