Masbee
-- Rookie of the Year
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,856
- Likes
- 97
- Points
- 48
I was thinking about this in a slightly different context recently: college towns.
College students get to vote where they go to school, quite often, and in towns that have large student bodies and/or smaller non-college communities, a population that turns over ever four or five years could establish laws and ordinances that hurt the people that are permanent residents. It's a pretty significant moral hazard that I'm surprised isn't a bigger deal than it is.
I think that there's a similar moral hazard when people vote who have no investment in the larger system and income taxes, in particular. If there is no reason for someone to fear increased taxes (because they won't pay them), then that person will very often vote in favor of them... or if a person gets benefits with no costs, it's unlikely they will vote against their own interests.
I don't know what the answer is.
Ed O.
There is no answer or "solution".
It is one of the key flaws of democracy.
It is why this country was founded as a republic and not a democracy.
Property rights, rule of law, strong minority rights, senates with disproportionate representation, etc. are all there to slow or prevent tryanny of the majority.

