OT The Government Has No Plan for Reuniting the Immigrant Families It Is Tearing Apart

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

wrong....they're all over the globe...almost every nation in the Pacific Rim has lots of Filipinos...they go everywhere....even the Middle East. Canada can't compete with the Filipino populations in China, Australia, Taiwan, on and on....my son worked fishing in Alaska when he was younger and he said the vast majority of his coworkers there were Filipino as well...you folks get around

Well, in North America. The easier move is to Canada first. Usually nurses there. Hell, my parents went to Canada first then moved to Oregon

In most of the rest of the world, Filipinos are the housekeepers. We are the Mexicans of Asia for a reason. It's the move we did in Italy or any other country, cant find someone who speaks English? Your next best bet is to find a filipino (they all speak English by the way)
 
Well, in North America. The easier move is to Canada first. Usually nurses there.

In most of the rest of the world, Filipinos are the housekeepers. We are the Mexicans of Asia for a reason. It's the move we did in Italy or any other country, cant find someone who speaks English? Your next best bet is to find a filipino (they all speak English by the way)
All of my nice nurses were Filipino. The head nurse, an old white man army nurse named Walter can burn in hell.
 
The back flips you guys have to go through to justify

I have to presume MarAzul would want to prosecute other law breakers. Fugitive slaves. Jews in hiding. The Founding fathers and mothers. French resistance.

I justify nothing, no back flips here. I love the rule of law. And yes, I want it enforced. On the federal level, the President has the responsibility, to see that all laws are duly enforced.
If you do not like the law, you pressure your Congressman/Senator to change the law. Whining about it being enforced shows a lack of understanding and appreciation of the system.
 
The easier move is to Canada first.
Hawaii...that'd be the first move here for many...another place that is majority Filipino....in Hawaii you become a "local" as a Filipino faster than any other place over here.
 
Hawaii...that'd be the first move here for many...another place that is majority Filipino....

I think many have been there though, plantation workers. Same process as moving to the mainland though, it's tough to get in legally unless you are rich or have some connections
 
It's hard to even get a Visa because they assume you'll just overstay your Visa (known as a TNT)
 
I think many have been there though, plantation workers. Same process as moving to the mainland though, it's tough to get in legally unless you are rich or have some connections
marrying a local is the go to move in Hawaii
 
I think many have been there though, plantation workers. Same process as moving to the mainland though, it's tough to get in legally unless you are rich or have some connections
Marcos had no problem...lived there like a king after robbing the country
 
Amusing to contrast your approval of jailing immigrants prior to a hearing with your disapproval of jailing Paul Manafort pre-trial.

Whatever could be the difference between the two cases, one wonders? I don't want to race to judgement, or white-wash the situation. Perhaps you could provide some color?

barfo

Damn! That was a good effort. You touched all the bases with nothing but an infield dribble.:blush:
 
There's no law that states asylum seekers have to be separated from their families. It's a policy.

In fact, per Article 31 of the 1951 Refugee Convention in Geneva (which the US is a signatory) "The contracting states shall not impose penalties on refugees who entered illegally in search of asylum if they present themselves "
 
Amusing to contrast your approval of jailing immigrants prior to a hearing with your disapproval of jailing Paul Manafort pre-trial.

Whatever could be the difference between the two cases, one wonders? I don't want to race to judgement, or white-wash the situation. Perhaps you could provide some color?

barfo

Sounds like the batter faced an incompetent, error laden defense

But, could there be a strait forward simple answer.
One (the citizen) was eligible for bail but denied. The other (illegals) are not eligible for bail and the courts have so ruled.

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/27/5890...ants-can-continue-to-be-detained-indefinitely
 
Nobody here seems against enforcing immigration laws. Some are just kind
There's no law that states asylum seekers have to be separated from their families. It's a policy.

In fact, per Article 31 of the 1951 Refugee Convention in Geneva (which the US is a signatory) "The contracting states shall not impose penalties on refugees who entered illegally in search of asylum if they present themselves "

You’re gonna hurt peoples brains with facts like this
 
This whole thing strikes me as bull. If I were told at any border, if you cross here your children will be taken from you and you will be incarcerated, There would be nothing left to discuss.
I am out of there, fuck this place, I find some where else to go.
Now if these are real parents submitting to this shit, what the fuck is wrong with them?
 
This whole thing strikes me as bull. If I were told at any border, if you cross here your children will be taken from you and you will be incarcerated, There would be nothing left to discuss.
I am out of there, fuck this place, I find some where else to go.
Now if these are real parents submitting to this shit, what the fuck is wrong with them?

You think they are 'crisis actors' maybe?

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top