yankeesince59
"Oh Captain, my Captain".
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 31,091
- Likes
- 13,851
- Points
- 113
Not gonna get agreement on this issue, period.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still have to shoot it regularly to keep up on skill.
There are some people.... Okay, I own a gun! Im safe! Lock it in the safe, and never take the classes or learn about gun safety and responsibility. Blows my mind.
This goes for you too bro, since you've admitted not being into guns. Just cause you get your hands on one doesn't mean it will save you unless you are familiar with it and how it shoots.
Oh, if i get an assault weapon, I'll get training. Big league training.
Not gonna get agreement on this issue, period.
Not gonna get agreement on this issue, period.
Sure, people kill people with guns, guns don't do it by themselves. That's a pretty shallow observation, though.
The point is that guns enable people to kill much more easily and quickly. If guns didn't exist or weren't allowed, there would still be criminally malicious people and murderers. But it's much harder to kill 20 or 50 people at a time with a knife. Murders would still happen--mass murders would be far, far, far rarer. Not because people would suddenly stop wanting to mass murder, but because mass murder would be much, much, much harder.
Let's stop with "guns don't kill people, people kill people." It's trite and meaningless when it comes to the discussion of the effect of unregulated firearms on society. "Society" already denotes that people are the actors. The question is whether we want to allow guns to be an accessible tool for those people.
check this out!
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.2631724950482182&type=3
@EL PRESIDENTE
Looks like you need a trip to idaho soon. Can likely get a gun and training all in one.
Still not a good lookOkay? Looks peaceful to me? They’re not antagonizing the protest, the protest isn’t antagonizing them. No guns are being pointed, no fingers on triggers... obviously there to protect their property and neighborhood from those who wish to cause damage.
Neither is the rioting and looting, it’s sad it’s come to what it is, but I get protecting your community from potential destruction.Still not a good look
HahahaWho said anything about propping guns up or identifying them as important? I know I didnt. So here you are again twisting words around, then you will tell me to ignore you even though you quoted me and now are saying things irrelevant to the convo....
People aren't responsible with cars and they kill. Lets ban them too and blame the cars and not the drivers...
People arent responsible with Swords. Ive seen the videos. Lets ban those too.
Hey, words can kill. We should ban speech too!
Sigh..
Ill pull a Stren. Im right and you are wrong. End of discussion.
Neither is the rioting and looting, it’s sad it’s come to what it is, but I get protecting your community from potential destruction.
You got ALL that from that video?Okay? Looks peaceful to me? They’re not antagonizing the protest, the protest isn’t antagonizing them. No guns are being pointed, no fingers on triggers... obviously there to protect their property and neighborhood from those who wish to cause damage.
That is fucking disgusting! What are all those rednecks guarding, that white fence?
Yeah, I really don’t think those with the guns are trying to hurt the protesters in any way. They just don’t want the assholes who are using the protests as a cover to destroy their neighborhood. How is protecting your neighborhood any different than protecting your place of business? It’s your community, take it back.You got ALL that from that video?
Sooo...if the government make guns illegal, are they still attainable?
Sure. Most things are attainable, if you have the right contacts and enough money. The question is how easily accessible we want to make tools of mass killing.
Let's be honest. That stunt is intended to intimidate. Nothing else.
![]()
I'll bet you're right.https://www.heritage.org/firearms/commentary/the-second-amendment-saved-these-gun-owners-lives-april
I bet no one reads this......
![]()
It takes two to tango. Now, which one is more controllable? Is it the shooter or the gun? Pretty hard to control the shooter unless he's an ex con. So, what does that leave?Sure, people kill people with guns, guns don't do it by themselves. That's a pretty shallow observation, though.
The point is that guns enable people to kill much more easily and quickly. If guns didn't exist or weren't allowed, there would still be criminally malicious people and murderers. But it's much harder to kill 20 or 50 people at a time with a knife. Murders would still happen--mass murders would be far, far, far rarer. Not because people would suddenly stop wanting to mass murder, but because mass murder would be much, much, much harder.
Let's stop with "guns don't kill people, people kill people." It's trite and meaningless when it comes to the discussion of the effect of unregulated firearms on society. "Society" already denotes that people are the actors. The question is whether we want to allow guns to be an accessible tool for those people.
The best weapon for self defense has to be the shotgun.of course. And i bet they wouldnt deny it. Intimidate any lawless factions from committing senseless crimes of violence.
When the protests leave the business district and enter residential neighbors and its a FACT the protestors have those following that are intent on destruction, it changes things.
How can anyone put these people down for wanting to protect their own?
no its not a good look at all. It terrifies me the global image being formed.
But lets not criticize those who are wanting to protect their homes from what is happing all over the country.
there has got to be a compromise.
There must be some common sense and common ground.
it may not look good but i would never criticize anyone for wanting to protect their own family to the fullest extent of their capabilities.
It isn’t like its a hollow threat and the danger isn’t real.
Turn on the news!
The best weapon for self defense has to be the shotgun.
I should have said for home defense.why?
i gave my reason why i dont think so.
Maybe in an apartment with one or two people, but in full scale anarchy?
I could be wrong tbough. Im no gun expert.
I never got the thrill either. Been to gun ranges for bachelor parties, and thought it was pretty fucking boring tbh.
I’m gonna one up you. I went to a bachelor party in a barn in Warren, Oregon. No strippers, no blow. Just a much of dudes sitting around bullshitting drinking coors light.
The night ended for my group when some red neck rando swung at me from behind and missed and a buddy popped him in the face and knocked one of his teeth out. We decided it was lame as fuck and dipped.
‘Merica