Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This will cost Harris and Walz the election!
Tim Walz Under Fire for Allegedly Inflating Bag Toss Score at Family BBQ in 1998
https://thehardtimes.net/culture/ti...flating-bag-toss-score-at-family-bbq-in-1998/
Good for them!
Why repeat stances and answer the same questions over and over
since she's been nominated she's surged in the polls so I don't know where you're getting this from unless it's pure projection. Her detractors were never going to vote blue to begin with. Nothing to do with her plea for the truth or her bipartisan support. More republicans have endorsed her campaign than any time in history ...I think you're dead wrong on this one. For a split second just consider the alternative if you want to talk about turn offs. Voter registrations have also surged since she joined the campaign. She wants a third, debate but Trump is afraid to lose another one so her speeches have actually boosted her poll numbers, not reduced them.The more she talks off script, the more voters she turns off.
This is probably one of the most impressive campaign events I have ever seen. Oprah's Unite for America with thousands of on line viewers. It's worth the watch!
What a witch.
Kamala Harris prosecuted a mother whose daughter was missing school due to being in the hospital. This is just one in a series of offenses she committed while DA, some of which Tulsi exposed (and destroyed Kamala's candidacy).
Oh wait, nevermind, I'm going off script here. Let's all pretend we are now excited about Kamala!
Why is the hell does this not apply to the large orange "man" she's up against?The more she talks off script, the more voters she turns off.
The more she talks off script, the more voters she turns off.
The right has been attacking the first amendment far more than Democrats.
The right has been attacking the first amendment far more than Democrats.
No comparison here.
Yes, by banning books. By legislating schools not teach certain topics. By forcing religious propaganda into schools and government buildings.How? By banning books with sexual content from school libraries? Where are the leaders on the right openly complaining about how the constitution is preventing them from censoring speech, or pressuring social media to silence things critical of government policies? You're so off base here its beyond pathetic.
The fact that this is a partisan issue is clear in every poll, as Democrats state the government needs to be more involved in censoring speech than Republicans, by a wide margin.
No books are being banned. It's content being filtered out of school libraries for appropriateness.Yes, by banning books. By legislating schools not teach certain topics. By forcing religious propaganda into schools and government buildings.
I'm glad that you seem to at least value free speech, but you need to wake the fuck up to the party you're supporting.
You really do. We support you in waking up to it! You're almost there!
Someday you'll learn how wrong you've always been! We're so proud of you for understanding how wrong you've been for so long! Yay you!
I don't support any party. I support individuals.No books are being banned. It's content being filtered out of school libraries for appropriateness.
OK, but we are talking about major political leaders, the New York Times, talking about the need to change the constitution in order to be able to abridge free speech. Free speech is the basis of our democracy, that's why it's #1 in the Bill of Rights.
I'm glad that you seem to at least value free speech, but you need to wake the fuck up to the party you're supporting.
Oh the Irony of somebody who supports Trump talking about “appropriateness” UNREAL!No books are being banned. It's content being filtered out of school libraries for appropriateness.