Politics The Kamala Harris Thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Attachments

  • cornhole-master.gif
    cornhole-master.gif
    793.9 KB · Views: 146
What a witch.

Kamala Harris prosecuted a mother whose daughter was missing school due to being in the hospital. This is just one in a series of offenses she committed while DA, some of which Tulsi exposed (and destroyed Kamala's candidacy).

Oh wait, nevermind, I'm going off script here. Let's all pretend we are now excited about Kamala!

 
Prosecute mothers of sick children: YES!

Prosecute law breaking banks: Hell nah!
 
The more she talks off script, the more voters she turns off.
since she's been nominated she's surged in the polls so I don't know where you're getting this from unless it's pure projection. Her detractors were never going to vote blue to begin with. Nothing to do with her plea for the truth or her bipartisan support. More republicans have endorsed her campaign than any time in history ...I think you're dead wrong on this one. For a split second just consider the alternative if you want to talk about turn offs. Voter registrations have also surged since she joined the campaign. She wants a third, debate but Trump is afraid to lose another one so her speeches have actually boosted her poll numbers, not reduced them.
 
Last edited:
This is probably one of the most impressive campaign events I have ever seen. Oprah's Unite for America with thousands of on line viewers. It's worth the watch!

Exactly what Harris fans needed to hear, but it will be picked apart by the MAGAts as communistic and too detailed. In other words, it's far, far too specific for those raised on a concept of a platform or support a candidate who literally makes it up as he goes along. Though it would be fun to watch the Right's heads explode as they watch it.......
 
What a witch.

Kamala Harris prosecuted a mother whose daughter was missing school due to being in the hospital. This is just one in a series of offenses she committed while DA, some of which Tulsi exposed (and destroyed Kamala's candidacy).

Oh wait, nevermind, I'm going off script here. Let's all pretend we are now excited about Kamala!


Well, well, well...... look who's back. And you didn't even need to change your name. Welcome back angry guy.
 
The Democraps keep telling you, over and over again what they want to do.

upload_2024-9-29_5-10-14.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2024-9-29_5-10-14.png
    upload_2024-9-29_5-10-14.png
    179.3 KB · Views: 105
The right has been attacking the first amendment far more than Democrats.

No comparison here.

How? By banning books with sexual content from school libraries? Where are the leaders on the right openly complaining about how the constitution is preventing them from censoring speech, or pressuring social media to silence things critical of government policies? You're so off base here its beyond pathetic.

The fact that this is a partisan issue is clear in every poll, as Democrats state the government needs to be more involved in censoring speech than Republicans, by a wide margin.
 
How? By banning books with sexual content from school libraries? Where are the leaders on the right openly complaining about how the constitution is preventing them from censoring speech, or pressuring social media to silence things critical of government policies? You're so off base here its beyond pathetic.

The fact that this is a partisan issue is clear in every poll, as Democrats state the government needs to be more involved in censoring speech than Republicans, by a wide margin.
Yes, by banning books. By legislating schools not teach certain topics. By forcing religious propaganda into schools and government buildings.
 
Yes, by banning books. By legislating schools not teach certain topics. By forcing religious propaganda into schools and government buildings.
No books are being banned. It's content being filtered out of school libraries for appropriateness.

OK, but we are talking about major political leaders, the New York Times, talking about the need to change the constitution in order to be able to abridge free speech. Free speech is the basis of our democracy, that's why it's #1 in the Bill of Rights.

I'm glad that you seem to at least value free speech, but you need to wake the fuck up to the party you're supporting.
 
I'm glad that you seem to at least value free speech, but you need to wake the fuck up to the party you're supporting.

You really do. We support you in waking up to it! You're almost there!

Someday you'll learn how wrong you've always been! We're so proud of you for understanding how wrong you've been for so long! Yay you!
 
You really do. We support you in waking up to it! You're almost there!

Someday you'll learn how wrong you've always been! We're so proud of you for understanding how wrong you've been for so long! Yay you!

Show me videos of Republican leaders calling for the 1st amendment to be undermined, or lamenting how it's hindering censorship. I'm not saying the right is perfect on this issue. I 100% disagreed with Trump saying those who burn the American flag should get prison time. But openly complaining about the constitution? That's is on another level entirely.

Also the disparity in how each party views this is clear from polls. Though if you've been really paying attention, you shouldn't even need polls to prove it.
 
No books are being banned. It's content being filtered out of school libraries for appropriateness.

OK, but we are talking about major political leaders, the New York Times, talking about the need to change the constitution in order to be able to abridge free speech. Free speech is the basis of our democracy, that's why it's #1 in the Bill of Rights.

I'm glad that you seem to at least value free speech, but you need to wake the fuck up to the party you're supporting.
I don't support any party. I support individuals.

I don't support anybody who wants to restrict the 1A. And I wouldn't support changes to the 1A without very careful consideration. I can't imagine a change that I would support.
 
Trump running ads slamming Harris for siding with trans people instead of "you".
 
Whenever this Bimbo is asked a question about detailing one of her plans, she starts talking about how she was "born in a middle class family."

She's like a pull cord doll, you can ask her a question, but it's really like pulling a cord, and she'll regurgitate a line her handlers gave her.

 
It's been a steady stream of articles and rhetoric like this from left wing publications and politicians.
GYtTZ4haYAALp0I
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top