wizenheimer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 24,910
- Likes
- 37,886
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No--what he's saying is that people who are in favor of trading Dame are so willing to do so that they'll convince themselves that an average player (Barnes) is actually a future all-star to justify that player being the centerpiece of a Dame trade.
You and @wizenheimer are on the same side of this discussion. I'm the one being unreasonable here.
View attachment 55569
someone ELI5 please. How is the media clipping his comment ‘moving the goal post?’
Not THAT quick.Teams i can remember w/o doing much digging that made a quick turn-around, something most of us want to see the bazers do this summer
2020 Suns caught fire late, missed the playoffs, added CP3, contended following year
2023 Kings, 17 years irrelevant, last season they were not good, had a great deadline and summer, now 3rd in west
2019 Raptors, made a big win-now move, rewarded with a chip *with good luck
2008 lakers, sucked 3 years prior with only kobe, got gasol, won 2 chip of next 3 years
Suns - drafted Booker, Bridges, Ayton before adding Paul.
The Suns, Kings, and Raptors took years to build. It took a long time to get them to the point where one move pushed them over the top. And we don’t even know how good the Kings will actually be.Yeah I’ve seen the Suns used as an example of a team that went ‘all-in!’ frequently (vs build through the draft) and the comparison doesn’t work because of the years of lottery suckery that team went through first to build its asset pool—Ayton, Book, Bridges, Cam, etc.
Not THAT quick.
Suns - drafted Booker, Bridges, Ayton before adding Paul.
Kings - drafted Fox, Murray and Halliburton who they traded for Sabonis.
Raptors - drafted Siakam, Powell and DeRozan who they traded for Kawhi.
These were all teams who had spent a significant amount of time building their teams before making a trade for the final piece.
Our team is nowhere near ready to compete.
No--what he's saying is that people who are in favor of trading Dame are so willing to do so that they'll convince themselves that an average player (Barnes) is actually a future all-star to justify that player being the centerpiece of a Dame trade.
You and @wizenheimer are on the same side of this discussion. I'm the one being unreasonable here.
View attachment 55569
Blazerd still have Dame.
Blazers drafted Simons, he has some value we can use with other pieces for trades.
Blazers drafted Sharpe, SG of now and the future.
Blazers acquire Grant
Blazers acquire Thybulle
Blazers obtain draft lottery: land lottery pick, acquired another rd 1 pick and multiple 2nd rd picks
. . .
The thing is the things I mentioned above seem laughable until the Blazers make it. Then we'll talk about them in that sense (the stuff that was done before the big leap) we just can't see it until we make the BIG move that will allow the team to contend.
No one talked about Ayton until the Suns went to WCF
No one talked about Brunson until Mavs went to WCF
No one talked about Adebayo until Heat went to ECF
. . .
The smaller moves are unnoticed until the BIG move propels the blazers to contention
Inner awareness to acknowledge an unreasonable take seems like fairly reasonable behavior to me.
This made me giggle.
I'm betting you teehee when you giggle
you should guffaw like a real man, but no, not you
This made me giggle.
Post from another board - Lillard just could be a target of Jazz if true.
"Word is the Jazz don't view the '24 draft class as a strong one, so they're not going to be worried about their pick conveying to OKC. Given that, and both Ainge and Zanik saying this offseason was going to be fun, it seems like they're about to get crunk with all those picks. Hoo boy.ost from "
if Dame is traded, and that's a long way from reality at this point, I don't think there's any chance he's traded within the division forcing the Blazers to face him 4 times a year. I'd bet he goes to the Eastern Conference.
Utah? Why would they go for Dame? The only players the Blazers would really want would be Markkanen and Kessler, and Utah wouldn't be trading those guys away for somebody like Dame when the goal would be adding Dame to them....even though they'd still be miles away from contending
I feel like the NYK would be a really cool destination for him to get to. NYK becomes more attractive of a destination if they can beat CLE. They also have so many picks and some young guys that could be interesting.Honestly the two places dame may force a trade (again, STRONG EMPHASIS ON THE NOTION THAT THIS IS FAR FROM REALISTIC) , It'd be to GSW or Utah. Brand wise it makes the most sense (national pundits are too stupid to understand).
I feel like the NYK would be a really cool destination for him to get to. NYK becomes more attractive of a destination if they can beat CLE. They also have so many picks and some young guys that could be interesting.
The DAL future 1st is getting increasingly more attractive and future unprotected NYK 1sts look a lot better once Dame retires. At the same time, Dame would be a huge star in the biggest market.
Well sure he could move to Oakland, but since they don't have an NBA team does that mean he'd still play for the Blazers?I doubt dame moves to anywhere but Utah or Oakland.
Well sure he could move to Oakland, but since they don't have an NBA team does that mean he'd still play for the Blazers?
He worships the devil!!??I enjoyed your semantic.
This is a family friendly site for fucks sakeI enjoyed your semantic.
This is a family friendly site for fucks sake
BoomYeah I shouldn't have talked about something so small
My ideal off season. A story by MM
1. Portland lands Wemby
2. Dame asks out
3. Portland trades Dame to Philly for Maxey, Milton, Harris who expires the following year
4. Portland trades Nurk and Ant for youth or picks
5. DO NOT re-sign Grant
Build around
Maxie 23
Sharpe 20
Wemby 19
That team would compete for a title in a few years. Especially given the assets and cap space