The Official 2020 NFL Draft Thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Seattle:

Let Clowney walk if he wants more than 18mil per year.

Cut Britt, Dickson, and maybe Fluker.

Sign Conklin (4/60) and Griffen (2/22). Re-sign Reed, Fant, Hunt, B-Jax, Thorpe, Jefferson, and Hollister.

Draft? Well that’s hard to predict but my dream picks?

1, 27: Tyler Biadasz, OL, Wisconsin
2, 59: Jaylon Johnson, CB, Utah
2, 64: Troy Dye, LB, Oregon
3, 103: Josh Uche, EDGE, Michigan
4, 133: Donovan Peoples-Jones, WR, Michigan
4, 145: Anthony Gordon, QB, Washington State
5, 155: Najee Harris, RB, Alabama
6, 214: Zach Johnson, OL, North Dakota State
7, 248: Nyles Pinckney, DL, Clemson
 
GhostOfPGA said:
Seattle:

Let Clowney walk if he wants more than 18mil per year.

Cut Britt, Dickson, and maybe Fluker.

Sign Conklin (4/60) and Griffen (2/22). Re-sign Reed, Fant, Hunt, B-Jax, Thorpe, Jefferson, and Hollister.

Draft? Well that’s hard to predict but my dream picks?

1, 27: Tyler Biadasz, OL, Wisconsin
2, 59: Jaylon Johnson, CB, Utah
2, 64: Troy Dye, LB, Oregon
3, 103: Josh Uche, EDGE, Michigan
4, 133: Donovan Peoples-Jones, WR, Michigan
4, 145: Anthony Gordon, QB, Washington State
5, 155: Najee Harris, RB, Alabama
6, 214: Zach Johnson, OL, North Dakota State
7, 248: Nyles Pinckney, DL, Clemson
Click to expand...

Like your dream picks.
Not sure Id want to pay Clowney over 20 million year?
I hope they do re-sign Hollister.
Cut all three of the guys you mentioned.
If they could get Shanualt Jr WR CO. at 27?
 
Hoopguru said:
Like your dream picks.
Not sure Id want to pay Clowney over 20 million year?
I hope they do re-sign Hollister.
Cut all three of the guys you mentioned.
If they could get Shanualt Jr WR CO. at 27?
Click to expand...
I think Lockett, DK, and Ursua will be a good trio next season, also wouldn’t be surprised to see Gordon back, especially if they let weed be used/not tested for in the new CBA. Grabbing defense or offensive line is definitely what the Hawks need to do in the first round.
 
OL and pass rush for Seattle. No matter how they go about doing it. Unfortunately we'll have to burn some draft capital or FA $ on a RB to hedge injuries. So tired of drafting RB's.
 
Hoopguru said:
Wow, has Herbert at 23 to Pats? He wont drop that far to many teams that need qb's.
Click to expand...
It's an interesting year for QB's I don't remember a year with so many guys who have been good, who are FA's, Rivers Brady, I think Cam is being released or is an FA(?), Mariota has been ok in the past, Winston (not sure what his situation is), Tannehill, Teddy Bridgewater, Dak. Not sure if some teams will be saying we think we can get a guy who is already ready to play in the NFL, or we want to target a young guy in the first round.
 
TorturedBlazerFan said:
https://www.sportsline.com/nfl/news...o-pay-attention/?ttag=splnnlheadline303052020

This article is basically talking about 49ers trading Jimmy G back to NE and Signing Brady. That would be... different. What do you 49er fans think?
Click to expand...
My initial answer is hell no, but I don't know if I'd be mad if it happened.

I think Jimmy G is going to be better next year now that he has a full season of recovery from his knee injury. Unless your name is Adrian Peterson it often takes a whole season before players are truly back to themselves. He also has an incredible record in games he's started so far.

If Brady was to succeed on another team I think it would be tough to find a better spot than the 49ers though. Their run scheme can help mask a lot of Brady's age issues. Their offensive line is above average. Their defense is really good and should be over the next couple years. While his physical skills are fading, I think I would trust his pre-snap reads more than Jimmy G right now.

I think if something like this did happen the reason I would ultimately be okay with it is that it would mean that Shanahan and Lynch have lost faith in Jimmy G long term. Whatever the reasoning behind that decision is I think I would trust that they know what they're doing. It does make some sense to get out of Jimmy G's contract (and what they'd have to pay him moving forward after that contract) although nothing bugs me more than the NFL's cap structure of having dead money on the books even if you trade a player, luckily in this case they gave him a ton of money upfront when they had a lot of cap space two years ago. You get Brady as a stop gap for a couple years for what I'd assume to be the same or less value. I'd also assume the Patriots would have to give the 49ers some sort of draft capital in that deal too. Then the 49ers have two years to groom Brady's replacement. Then when Brady retires in 2 years and most of your younger guys are coming up for new contracts they'd theoretically have a young and cheap QB waiting in the wings that would allow them to use money elsewhere like what Seattle did before Russell Wilson got paid.

So yeah, I guess I could be talked into it but if it were up to me I'd say no.
 
hoopsjock said:
My initial answer is hell no, but I don't know if I'd be mad if it happened.

I think Jimmy G is going to be better next year now that he has a full season of recovery from his knee injury. Unless your name is Adrian Peterson it often takes a whole season before players are truly back to themselves. He also has an incredible record in games he's started so far.

If Brady was to succeed on another team I think it would be tough to find a better spot than the 49ers though. Their run scheme can help mask a lot of Brady's age issues. Their offensive line is above average. Their defense is really good and should be over the next couple years. While his physical skills are fading, I think I would trust his pre-snap reads more than Jimmy G right now.

I think if something like this did happen the reason I would ultimately be okay with it is that it would mean that Shanahan and Lynch have lost faith in Jimmy G long term. Whatever the reasoning behind that decision is I think I would trust that they know what they're doing. It does make some sense to get out of Jimmy G's contract (and what they'd have to pay him moving forward after that contract) although nothing bugs me more than the NFL's cap structure of having dead money on the books even if you trade a player, luckily in this case they gave him a ton of money upfront when they had a lot of cap space two years ago. You get Brady as a stop gap for a couple years for what I'd assume to be the same or less value. I'd also assume the Patriots would have to give the 49ers some sort of draft capital in that deal too. Then the 49ers have two years to groom Brady's replacement. Then when Brady retires in 2 years and most of your younger guys are coming up for new contracts they'd theoretically have a young and cheap QB waiting in the wings that would allow them to use money elsewhere like what Seattle did before Russell Wilson got paid.

So yeah, I guess I could be talked into it but if it were up to me I'd say no.
Click to expand...
I think the only franchises Brady makes sense for are the Raiders and Chargers... I'm not sure how many people watched him last year but he's just old... He makes sense if you're just trying to stir up a new fan base. His mind is still incredible, but he can't throw much further than 10-15 yards very well anymore. It might be ok in a run-heavy team like the 49ers, but it's a move with almost no long term goals in mind.

I think it's really interesting if maybe the thinking is hey the 49ers are going all-in before they start having to pay those defensive players, but I think I agree with you that I wouldn't want to do that either.
 
hoopsjock said:
My initial answer is hell no, but I don't know if I'd be mad if it happened.

I think Jimmy G is going to be better next year now that he has a full season of recovery from his knee injury. Unless your name is Adrian Peterson it often takes a whole season before players are truly back to themselves. He also has an incredible record in games he's started so far.

If Brady was to succeed on another team I think it would be tough to find a better spot than the 49ers though. Their run scheme can help mask a lot of Brady's age issues. Their offensive line is above average. Their defense is really good and should be over the next couple years. While his physical skills are fading, I think I would trust his pre-snap reads more than Jimmy G right now.

I think if something like this did happen the reason I would ultimately be okay with it is that it would mean that Shanahan and Lynch have lost faith in Jimmy G long term. Whatever the reasoning behind that decision is I think I would trust that they know what they're doing. It does make some sense to get out of Jimmy G's contract (and what they'd have to pay him moving forward after that contract) although nothing bugs me more than the NFL's cap structure of having dead money on the books even if you trade a player, luckily in this case they gave him a ton of money upfront when they had a lot of cap space two years ago. You get Brady as a stop gap for a couple years for what I'd assume to be the same or less value. I'd also assume the Patriots would have to give the 49ers some sort of draft capital in that deal too. Then the 49ers have two years to groom Brady's replacement. Then when Brady retires in 2 years and most of your younger guys are coming up for new contracts they'd theoretically have a young and cheap QB waiting in the wings that would allow them to use money elsewhere like what Seattle did before Russell Wilson got paid.

So yeah, I guess I could be talked into it but if it were up to me I'd say no.
Click to expand...

He's from Palo Alto. Bay boy to the bone.
 
TorturedBlazerFan said:
I think the only franchises Brady makes sense for are the Raiders and Chargers... I'm not sure how many people watched him last year but he's just old... He makes sense if you're just trying to stir up a new fan base. His mind is still incredible, but he can't throw much further than 10-15 yards very well anymore. It might be ok in a run-heavy team like the 49ers, but it's a move with almost no long term goals in mind.

I think it's really interesting if maybe the thinking is hey the 49ers are going all-in before they start having to pay those defensive players, but I think I agree with you that I wouldn't want to do that either.
Click to expand...
See I think those two teams only make sense from a "fan" perspective. It would be a disaster on the field because Brady's diminished skill set with those teams would be brutal. Rivers actually had a slightly better QB rating than Brady did last year.
 
hoopsjock said:
See I think those two teams only make sense from a "fan" perspective. It would be a disaster on the field because Brady's diminished skill set with those teams would be brutal. Rivers actually had a slightly better QB rating than Brady did last year.
Click to expand...
I'm basically saying that it would only make sense to get people to buy tickets to go see Brady. Which I think is basically what you're saying.
 
@TorturedBlazerFan , more Packers articles about FA and the draft.

Packers options, intentions at LB taking shape amid free agency & draft news
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...gency-targets-draft-evaluation-2020-offseason

Green Bay Packers Rumors: Interest in LB Nick Kwiatkoski
https://dairylandexpress.com/2020/02/29/green-bay-packers-rumors-interest-lb-nick-kwiatkoski/

Green Bay Packers: 3 Mid-to-Late Round D-Line Prospects
https://dairylandexpress.com/2020/03/06/green-bay-packers-3-mid-to-late-round-d-line-prospects/

Packers meet with small school OL prospect at pro day
https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2020/03/05/packers-meet-with-small-school-ol-prospect-at-pro-day/

Packers: Three players already on roster who can make a difference
https://lombardiave.com/2020/03/06/packers-three-players-roster-difference/





 
What pisses me off is if they played with this level of energy all game, they'd be up 20.
 
Hobbesarable said:
Please share your thoughts about what you want your team to do in FA and the draft. I am interested what other people would like to see happen with their team.
@PtldPlatypus
@GhostOfPGA
@BonesJones
@hoopsjock
@Hoopguru
@Dom McBlazer
@Jade Falcon
@SlyPokerCat
Click to expand...
I'm not going with names but just positions.

Immediate needs - WR, IOL, pass-rusher
Other needs - CB (not REALLY a need but it depends on what we do with Jimmy Smith), RB (depending if we keep Ingram long-term which I'm not TOO sure to be the case), ILB (most underrated need for us)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top