Netted
Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 1,804
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 36
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Aug 11 2008, 01:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Aug 11 2008, 01:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Aug 11 2008, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm not down with Hughes at all. I'd rather have Webster than Hughes.
I don't really see how this improves us all that much...other than getting rid of Swift.</div>
Hughes is a much better defender, ballhandler and scorer than Simmons and his contract is the same length.
Basically it's a way to replace Simmons with Hughes without impacting the plan for 2010. Both are a potential injury liabilty. Also gives much more flexibility with lineups. Harris, Carter, Hughes, and Dooling can all create and with our bigs that is a necessity.
</div>
The thing about him and Simmons is that they both have shitty contracts. It's just that with Simmons' contract being shorter, his is less shitty and therefore more appealing. And if the "plan" for 2010 is still to get Lebron, well, I don't think he'd be all that excited to have Hughes on his team again.
</div>
Simmons isn't shorter... they both expire in 2010. He'll be going out while Lebron is coming in. Not sure Hughes is a lockerroom cancer.
And don't forget his best seasons were with Washington in a motion offense. With some elements of that here Hughes could thrive again.
I don't really see how this improves us all that much...other than getting rid of Swift.</div>
Hughes is a much better defender, ballhandler and scorer than Simmons and his contract is the same length.
Basically it's a way to replace Simmons with Hughes without impacting the plan for 2010. Both are a potential injury liabilty. Also gives much more flexibility with lineups. Harris, Carter, Hughes, and Dooling can all create and with our bigs that is a necessity.
</div>
The thing about him and Simmons is that they both have shitty contracts. It's just that with Simmons' contract being shorter, his is less shitty and therefore more appealing. And if the "plan" for 2010 is still to get Lebron, well, I don't think he'd be all that excited to have Hughes on his team again.
</div>
Simmons isn't shorter... they both expire in 2010. He'll be going out while Lebron is coming in. Not sure Hughes is a lockerroom cancer.
And don't forget his best seasons were with Washington in a motion offense. With some elements of that here Hughes could thrive again.