The Road to Impeachment

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Rastapopoulos said:
Is Trump Now a Subject of the Mueller Investigation?
While the Justice Department and Robert Mueller, the special counsel, have not commented on whether they are investigating Trump, several former federal prosecutors told me that if he’s not yet, he soon will be—or at least should be.
Former prosecutors who have served in both Republican and Democratic Administrations told me that an obstruction-of-justice case against Trump is a no-brainer. “Comey’s testimony in a grand jury would be enough to get an indictment,” Julie O’Sullivan, who was part of the team that investigated Whitewater, the Clinton land deal that attracted a special prosecutor in the early nineties, said. To O’Sullivan, Comey’s detailed account of the Oval Office meeting in which Trump cleared the room and then told Comey to let go of the investigation of Michael Flynn, whom Trump had fired, the previous day, was especially damning because it showed that Trump knew that what he was doing was wrong.

“For a prosecutor, this attempt to hide the conversation, all antenna are going up,” O’Sullivan told me. “That tells you that he has a consciousness that what he’s about to do is wrong. It’s like having a bonfire with documents in the back yard. It’s wonderful. Seriously, this is the best thing ever for a prosecutor.”
Click to expand...
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Hahahahahahahahaha
Click to expand...
 
Hey, just noticing on that Breitbart website you can save money on cable and there was a Trump daughter in a swimsuit. You're welcome
 
Rastapopoulos said:
And if he does?
Click to expand...

How pathetic this all was. Another nothingburger.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/337703-white-house-trump-has-no-intention-to-fire-mueller

White House: Trump 'has no intention' of firing Mueller

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE — President Trump has “no intention” of firing Robert Mueller as special counsel leading the Russia investigation, the White House said Tuesday.

“While the president has the right to, he has no intention to do so,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters flying with Trump back to Washington from a day trip to Wisconsin.

The comment is intended to tamp down speculation about whether the president would ax Mueller, which would be a politically explosive move that could further embroil his administration in controversy.
 
Rastapopoulos said:
Is Trump Now a Subject of the Mueller Investigation?
While the Justice Department and Robert Mueller, the special counsel, have not commented on whether they are investigating Trump, several former federal prosecutors told me that if he’s not yet, he soon will be—or at least should be.
Former prosecutors who have served in both Republican and Democratic Administrations told me that an obstruction-of-justice case against Trump is a no-brainer. “Comey’s testimony in a grand jury would be enough to get an indictment,” Julie O’Sullivan, who was part of the team that investigated Whitewater, the Clinton land deal that attracted a special prosecutor in the early nineties, said. To O’Sullivan, Comey’s detailed account of the Oval Office meeting in which Trump cleared the room and then told Comey to let go of the investigation of Michael Flynn, whom Trump had fired, the previous day, was especially damning because it showed that Trump knew that what he was doing was wrong.

“For a prosecutor, this attempt to hide the conversation, all antenna are going up,” O’Sullivan told me. “That tells you that he has a consciousness that what he’s about to do is wrong. It’s like having a bonfire with documents in the back yard. It’s wonderful. Seriously, this is the best thing ever for a prosecutor.”
Click to expand...

bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Hahahahahahahahaha
Click to expand...

Hahaha.

barfo
 
Trump finds out Comey is not Rosie O'Donell.......happy birthday!
 
Denny Crane said:
How pathetic this all was. Another nothingburger.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/337703-white-house-trump-has-no-intention-to-fire-mueller

White House: Trump 'has no intention' of firing Mueller

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE — President Trump has “no intention” of firing Robert Mueller as special counsel leading the Russia investigation, the White House said Tuesday.

“While the president has the right to, he has no intention to do so,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters flying with Trump back to Washington from a day trip to Wisconsin.

The comment is intended to tamp down speculation about whether the president would ax Mueller, which would be a politically explosive move that could further embroil his administration in controversy.
Click to expand...
1. It was started by Trump's own buddy, that Newsmax guy.
2. As Rosenstein confirmed yesterday, Sanders (and therefore almost certainly Trump) is wrong about Trump having the "right to" fire Mueller.
3. You seriously believe the White House after all this?
 
Rastapopoulos said:
1. It was started by Trump's own buddy, that Newsmax guy.
2. As Rosenstein confirmed yesterday, Sanders (and therefore almost certainly Trump) is wrong about Trump having the "right to" fire Mueller.
3. You seriously believe the White House after all this?
Click to expand...

I believe them over you.

What if monkeys fly out of your butt? That's the kind of question you ask. Completely unlikely, but I suppose you think possible.
 
barfo said:
Yes, Trump is very much like someone who shits in dustbins and showers.

Maybe he just doesn't know any better, or maybe he does it just because he knows he's not supposed to, but either way it's not something we can live with.

barfo
Click to expand...
Hahahahahahahahahajahajajahahah.

I'm doing fine
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Hahahahahahahahahajahajajahahah.

I'm doing fine
Click to expand...

First Trump shit on the Muslims, and bodyman5000 and 1 did not speak out—
Because he was not a Muslim.

Then Trump shit on the poor, and bodyman5000 and 1 did not speak out—
Because he was not poor.

Then Trump shit on Mother Nature, and bodyman5000 and 1 did not speak out—
Because he was not a tree hugger.

Then Trump shit on bodyman5000 and 1—and there was no one left to say "ooh, that's gross".

barfo
 
barfo said:
First Trump shit on the Muslims, and bodyman5000 and 1 did not speak out—
Because he was not a Muslim.

Then Trump shit on the poor, and bodyman5000 and 1 did not speak out—
Because he was not poor.

Then Trump shit on Mother Nature, and bodyman5000 and 1 did not speak out—
Because he was not a tree hugger.

Then Trump shit on bodyman5000 and 1—and there was no one left to say "ooh, that's gross".

barfo
Click to expand...
If it comes down to just me and Trump I'll be rich at least.
 
Has Trump been impeached yet? Where is this road leading us? Dead end? Is it just a long and winding road? Does it take a cheese staircase to the moon? I need to know...
 
fryed247 said:
Has Trump been impeached yet? Where is this road leading us? Dead end? Is it just a long and winding road? Does it take a cheese staircase to the moon? I need to know...
Click to expand...

Cheese escalator, and it goes down.

barfo
 
I think Mueller is doing his job and has to look into Comey's claims.

My guess is that he won't find any obstruction of justice.

Trump could have just pardoned Flynn, but instead chose to take a bullet for him. Not the best move.
 
Fascinating discussions of the parallels between Trump and Watergate Nixon.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/frank-rich-nixon-trump-and-how-a-presidency-ends.html

Snippet:

A related misperception that some present-day liberals tend to retrofit to 1973 has it that the Washington Republican leadership of that time included ballsy, principled moderates who would speak truth to their gangster president as the pathetic Trump lackeys Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan will not. If only. A few Republican senators did ask tough questions during the Watergate hearings — Howard Baker and Lowell Weicker, famously — but it took even them a year after the Watergate break-in to find their voices, and they were not in the leadership. Then, as now, so-called Establishment Republicans were more likely to gripe about Nixon in private or in not-for-attribution conversations with reporters. In public, they usually cowered, sparing the president their harshest criticism and cordoning him off from impeachable offenses out of fear of him and his base. The Republican minority leader in the House, the Arizona congressman John Rhodes, found his mail running three to one against Nixon until he talked about a possible presidential resignation; then the count flipped to eight to one in Nixon’s favor...

Nor did Nixon’s base ever desert him. At the nadir of Watergate, Nixon’s approval rating fell to 27 percent; by the time he resigned, that number had dropped to 24 percent. In other words, at least a quarter of the American populace had no problem telling pollsters that they were still behind a president who had lied repeatedly and engaged in unambiguously criminal conspiracies. They still saw Nixon as “one of us,” as he billed himself on posters in his first House run in 1946, and as a fighter who took on “them” — essentially the same elites that Trump inveighs against today.

It's not really surprising that Trump is following Nixon, given that Roy Cohn was his guru and Roger Stone is his advisor. Yes, this Roger Stone:

1024rogerstone02.jpg
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

yankeesince59
Politics Jeff Flake speaks out..."country over party"
Replies
14
Views
645
Lanny
Lanny
yankeesince59
OT Has Fox News been hacked?
Replies
22
Views
2K
Lanny
Lanny
SlyPokerDog
Politics Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Replies
15
Views
686
Road Ratt
Road Ratt
Hoopguru
Politics Klobuchar (the darkhorse) supporter thread!
2
Replies
32
Views
1K
Lanny
Lanny
SlyPokerDog
Politics George F. Will: Trump is no longer the worst person in government
Replies
26
Views
2K
MarAzul
MarAzul

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top