The only thing I dont really care for and I know Ive said it before and I will make this my last voiced opinion on it, but the deleting of posts leaves things very ambiguous and vague.
Were the mods fair? Who knows because now there is nothing to refer to to form an opinion.
I understand not wanting Blazers brass to read it, but then its also been noted that the players and management just laugh us off and move on, so that cant be that big of a deal.
It is a mark on the mods when it is in question whee the banning was fair or not. There is nothing to back up the action now.
Id love to read about how insulting Cippy was to get bane,d but aren't able to.
This places all deletions under the suspect category and I will consider them opinion based, based on the relationship with the mod and the poster.
If the posts were left up, there would be no question.
Maybe move them to an OT thread or something, so there is a reference as to what exactly was said or done that was so bad to be banned?
Just my suggestion and I know I'm not the only one here against deleting posts/editing, etc.
Mods put their fairness into question when things are removed and cant be referenced. Just sayin.