Curry's has been up around 15-16% though. CJ has the ball constantly and Seth is usually off the ball. Seth isn't a ball-stopper. Hes a spot up shooter.
Yeah, I was trying not to exaggerate his defense because that is tougher to judge by stats so I went with a safer answer.
I'm not trying to hate on Seth but the next time he passes out of a pick and roll will be the first time this season. That's obviously a slight exaggeration but not by much.
Well Seth doesnt play with Dame, or Nurk much so getting assists passing to ML, Or ET is much harder to do. I guess I dint really think of seth as a black hole but Ill have to look for a few games.
I started watching for it about 20 games ago. It's shocking how little he passes.
Honestly when the bench comes in I pretty much get straight to being annoyed that theres 5 bench players out there together. then I desperately start hoping that its not one of the nights where as a group they decide just suck... Ill watch for it more.
I'm with you on that. Part of me wants CJ back in with the 2nd unit and part of me wants them to just run a completely different offense. Curry should be running off at least 2-3 off ball picks per possession. You are right with who Curry is playing with but ET gets assists to those other guys, why can't Curry?
Hes only ran like 5... lmao. Hes barely had the chance to run pick n roll, after having a year and half off and switching teams.
And then do this:
If that package could land Blake (which I doubt, honestly), you loop NOP in and figure out a way to send Blake and CJ to them to get Davis.
Factor in a Griffin/CJ for Davis flip, and WAS could basically straight salary dump Porter to us if they wanted, without Harkless or Leonard even being included in the deals.
Why would New Orleans want those two for Davis? They'll be rebuilding. They'll want picks and young talent.
New Orleans says no.
Honestly, I don't think it would cost us two 1sts for Blake. His contract will deter most teams from trading for him which should lower his value quite a bit.
Perhaps. Or perhaps they'll want to see what a small-ball balanced scoring attack might accomplish. Or perhaps they'll want to extend the clock on obtaining usable assets.
Do they say no if we mortgage our whole future? If we do a Boston/Brooklyn deal? They get CJ and Zach our picks in 2o19, 21 and 23 and the rights to swap in 20, 22, and 24.
Well ET doesnt get assists to himself heh.
. I get what you’re saying though.
Yup I know
Wow, didn't realize he was leading the league in FT% as well. Only 1 miss on the season from the foul line.
Just realized I recognized your name from a different forum. I thought you were a long-time poster that took a hiatus.
I think the Blazers best option might be to wait for the Knicks to whiff in free agency and then they could dangle CJ out there. Might get a desperate knicks team willing to give up some players just because they think CJ could be a star for them.
But whom could they offer that would theoretically be worth it? They're obviously not giving up Porzingis. We should have no interest in Hardaway, Kanter, or Mudiay. Their rookies (Knox and Robinson) are intriguing, I guess, but is that really enough return for CJ?
I don't know. I'm sort of conflicted about what CJ's "worth" is in a trade. I could see some GM's not being interested in him at all. Some I think would look at him and think they could turn him into a star. Knox and Hardaway are the most intriguing to me.