BigGameDamian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 34,777
- Likes
- 14,227
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's wrong with this move?
Exactly, a shooter & not much else.Here is your Crabbe shooting replacement
What's wrong with this move?
He's a shooter, & not much else.
Exactly, a shooter & not much else.
A shooter who shot 30% from 3
Yes, it is a meh move. But at this point we're scraping the bottom of the barrel.I mean.... it's just....eh. I would have been more interested if we had gotten him when he signed with Minnesota several years ago.
Edit: It was the Thunder not the Wolves. My mistake.
He also shot 92 FT% last year, so he can still shoot.Career 40% shooter. And he did finish last season shooting over 40% after he moved to Chicago. I've always thought he'd be a fit for Stotts but didn't think we'd actually sign him just because he's a little older.
A shooter who shot 30% from 3
Damn, this dude's gonna be 32 when the season starts, ancient for this team, lol.
Saw this on Reddit:
View attachment 16154
Imagine if we replaced Crabbe with a guy making the minimum hope some of you talk about that as much as you did about Crabbes contract.
Nevermind, I know what it'll be. Olshey lucked into Morrow. Lol

Outside of Nurkic, Morrow's defense fits right in with where Portland was last season.
Outside of Nurkic, Morrow's defense fits right in with where Portland was last season.
In Stott's offense Morrow should catch the ball in better rhythm than he did watching and waiting and not knowing WTF was going to happen in the Westbrick ball hog offense.
Just speculation, but I know it would be true for me.
![]()
