DryHeat
Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2015
- Messages
- 61
- Likes
- 46
- Points
- 18
Well, we're not winning the championship next year so why the fuck does it matter?
People were saying that in 1976-77.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, we're not winning the championship next year so why the fuck does it matter?
People were saying that in 1976-77.
Do you really think this team is going to make the playoffs, let alone beat SAS and GSW to then beat CLE for the championship if only we don't start CJ?
Well, we're not winning the championship next year so why the fuck does it matter?
It may be beneficial for CJ to acclimate himself as a back-up pg while sliding into the 6th man scoring role. It'll depend on Coach Stotts game plan.
In that case, they would probably start Henderson at the 2.
Good points... trading for Henderson gives Stotts an excuse to start "the vet" over the more offensively potent CJ.
That is my biggest concern, hoping for open competition and that determines the starters.
I just want the 5 best team players to be the starters. Whoever plays the best together and go from there.
Stotts has work to do if anyone is on the hot seat, its him.
Well you don't put all your eggs in one basket....Stotts has to put together the starting lineup and second strings by balancing out the offensive and defensive....it is not always the best strategy to start all the best players...there has to be something left for the benchGood points... trading for Henderson gives Stotts an excuse to start "the vet" over the more offensively potent CJ.
Are you seriously advocating that Damian and McCollum be a starting backcourt? You can't play those two together full time; sure spurts of small ball are possible, but not all the time and especially because it would be a disaster defensively.
Pick and roll is also predicated on the threat that the roll man might pick and pop. Otherwise defenses will sag back and clog the lane. Damian is going to get a healthy dose of double teams, forcing him to get rid of the ball early which is going to put the onus of handling the ball and scoring on guys like Aminu, et al.
Offense is going to be a problem, because teams that can't shoot in the modern NBA almost always have trouble generating offense.
Are you seriously advocating that Damian and McCollum be a starting backcourt? You can't play those two together full time; sure spurts of small ball are possible, but not all the time and especially because it would be a disaster defensively.
Maybe. It's hard to imagine he and Dame and CJ starting duo. OTOH,I just don't think CJ is ever going to be a starter. I think he'll fill both the backup one and two so he can get 30-ish minutes.
But the real question is, would CJ pass on Carmelo?Maybe. It's hard to imagine he and Dame and CJ starting duo. OTOH,
Dame: 6' 3" great offense, mediocre defense
CJ: 6' 4" (according to wiki) good offense, pretty good defense, from a very small school
reminds me of
Mr X: 6' 1" great offense, mediocre defense
Mr Y: 6' 3" good offense, very good defense, from a very small school
Mr X and Mr Y won championships together, and are both in the hall of fame.
So, while it isn't common, it is doable. I know some of you are going to say that CJ is no Mr. Y, but neither was Mr. Y. He was the 18th draft pick from a small school. Mr Y. averaged 9.4 and 11.8 PPG his first 2 years, and didn't average 18 or more until his 6th year, and only average 20 or more 3 years of his 14 years with a career average of 16.1 PPG.
I don't know who told you CJ plays good D, but they were lying. He and Dame both really struggle on the pick and roll. I love the idea of starting a freaking huge line up with CJ anchoring the scoring off the bench. We could start Aminu at the 3, and any combo of Davis/Plumlee/Kaman that can get points up front. Kaman has the best post moves, but the Plumlee Lillard alley-oop connection is going to be real. Then with one sub we shift Aminu to the 4, get Kaman off the court as quickly as possible and then run hard with the second unit. We have a lot of young athletes with a lot of different skillsets so it's tempting to play small all the time, but I think if we start small were gonna get run out of the building half the time. Best turn it into a wrestling match, keep it close and then let Dame and CJ go for it in the 4th quarter.Maybe. It's hard to imagine he and Dame and CJ starting duo. OTOH,
Dame: 6' 3" great offense, mediocre defense
CJ: 6' 4" (according to wiki) good offense, pretty good defense, from a very small school
reminds me of
Mr X: 6' 1" great offense, mediocre defense
Mr Y: 6' 3" good offense, very good defense, from a very small school
Mr X and Mr Y won championships together, and are both in the hall of fame.
So, while it isn't common, it is doable. I know some of you are going to say that CJ is no Mr. Y, but neither was Mr. Y. He was the 18th draft pick from a small school. Mr Y. averaged 9.4 and 11.8 PPG his first 2 years, and didn't average 18 or more until his 6th year, and only average 20 or more 3 years of his 14 years with a career average of 16.1 PPG.
Are you seriously advocating that Damian and McCollum be a starting backcourt? You can't play those two together full time; sure spurts of small ball are possible, but not all the time and especially because it would be a disaster defensively.
sniff, sniff. I've been lied to. Hopefully, you are wrong, but it's not obvious that you are.I don't know who told you CJ plays good D, but they were lying. He and Dame both really struggle on the pick and roll. I love the idea of starting a freaking huge line up with CJ anchoring the scoring off the bench. We could start Aminu at the 3, and any combo of Davis/Plumlee/Kaman that can get points up front. Kaman has the best post moves, but the Plumlee Lillard alley-oop connection is going to be real. Then with one sub we shift Aminu to the 4, get Kaman off the court as quickly as possible and then run hard with the second unit. We have a lot of young athletes with a lot of different skillsets so it's tempting to play small all the time, but I think if we start small were gonna get run out of the building half the time. Best turn it into a wrestling match, keep it close and then let Dame and CJ go for it in the 4th quarter.
I think for 5 minute spurts it could be dynamic. I think for 10 minute spurts it could be disastrous.sniff, sniff. I've been lied to. Hopefully, you are wrong, but it's not obvious that you are.
One of the problems with the CJ/Dame starting lineup is that I truly think it best to have one in the game at all time.
One minor niggle, Damian's defense isn't mediocre, it's bad - like "6 points per 100 possessions worse" kind of bad.
CJ is good at steals. Probably our best last season.
One minor niggle, Damian's defense isn't mediocre, it's bad - like "6 points per 100 possessions worse" kind of bad. Pairing him with a smallish shooting guard who is just OK on defense isn't a great idea. That's my only point I was trying to make when I replied to Mags comment above - the team needs a guy on the wing who compliments Damian IMO and helps cover up some of his deficiencies (and hopefully Dame improves at that end of the court).
One minor niggle, Damian's defense isn't mediocre, it's bad - like "6 points per 100 possessions worse" kind of bad.
I'll make a general reply to the replies above, not necessarily specific to you, Nik.One minor niggle, Damian's defense isn't mediocre, it's bad - like "6 points per 100 possessions worse" kind of bad. Pairing him with a smallish shooting guard who is just OK on defense isn't a great idea. That's my only point I was trying to make when I replied to Mags comment above - the team needs a guy on the wing who compliments Damian IMO and helps cover up some of his deficiencies (and hopefully Dame improves at that end of the court).
One minor niggle, Damian's defense isn't mediocre, it's bad - like "6 points per 100 possessions worse" kind of bad. Pairing him with a smallish shooting guard who is just OK on defense isn't a great idea. That's my only point I was trying to make when I replied to Mags comment above - the team needs a guy on the wing who compliments Damian IMO and helps cover up some of his deficiencies (and hopefully Dame improves at that end of the court).
Man, screw the stats., use your eyes. CJ runs into screens like they're Goddamn magnets. He and Dame both have a lot of potential to improve and I think they will. Also, Pat Connaughton might just seal the show this year. I have zero qualms about starting him and playing him 20-25. Dude plays the right wayUsing the same stat: http://www.82games.com/1415/14POR4.HTM CJ is a good defender (101.1 on, 105.8 off).
Man, screw the stats., use your eyes.
That is indeed part of my "screw the stats" opinion. Also that number sounds overwhelmingly average, is that supposed to be good or bad?I guess opposing SGs coincidentally shoot 43.5% when he's in the game.
We must find another scorer. We don't have him right now.I'll concede this year's team will be more athletic and I think some of the guys will be better individual defenders (Davis, Aminu) but they are going to be seriously offensively challenged. I'm not sure how Stotts is going to generate offense with this crew.
Are we talking about Dumars and Thomas?Maybe. It's hard to imagine he and Dame and CJ starting duo. OTOH,
Dame: 6' 3" great offense, mediocre defense
CJ: 6' 4" (according to wiki) good offense, pretty good defense, from a very small school
reminds me of
Mr X: 6' 1" great offense, mediocre defense
Mr Y: 6' 3" good offense, very good defense, from a very small school
Mr X and Mr Y won championships together, and are both in the hall of fame.
So, while it isn't common, it is doable. I know some of you are going to say that CJ is no Mr. Y, but neither was Mr. Y. He was the 18th draft pick from a small school. Mr Y. averaged 9.4 and 11.8 PPG his first 2 years, and didn't average 18 or more until his 6th year, and only average 20 or more 3 years of his 14 years with a career average of 16.1 PPG.
