OT ...Trump...beginning of the end? (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
blgridesagain said:
You're not too obsessed with Trump are you?
Nah, course not.

Still can't seem to figure why a candidate is being branded (by a "law and order"guy) as some kind of racist jerk who insists on building and securing a physical boundary on a border which is well documented and widely accepted as being a sieve for masses of unknown undocumented people slipping into communities many many who are uneducated (even in their OWN LANGUAGE), possibly/probably carrying contagious deseases and OBVIOUSLY many of them also career criminals with a real possibility of some being terrorists and lastly being practically a free-zone for smuggling drugs.
While this same candidate has NEVER ONCE called out and criticized Mexican American CITIZENS - you're beginning to sound like those "horrible dishonest" members of the media Trump has mentioned time and again.

They got it wrong the first time by failing to emphasize that Trump was talking about those who are here illegally committing crimes, and those who are entering illegally.....until the morons in the media finally got it right, but you haven't yet caught up. lol

As for a temporary ban on Muslim immigration and refugees ("until we figure out what the hell is going on") , have you forgotten that the terrorists have admitted they will try and plant some agents amoung them?.....AND, France,Germany and Belgium are now drastically reconsidering their "refugee"/ immigrant policies and a recent poll from Germany showed 90% against further immigration from Muslim nations.

And 30 Governors were against accepting refugees - all but one of them were Republicans.....so maybe they are kinda in line with Trump....though he said it first. lol


Help me out with this - what makes you think the U.S. will be better off nationally and globally with an ultra conservative like Cruz who has shown no indication whatsoever of being capable of flexibility, adapting to changing situations unable and/or unwilling to work with others who aren't like minded?


Eisenhower deported millions of illegals, Clinton also.

As for China and Mexico.....unless you haven't been paying attention or hard of hearing- Trump has said he has nothing against their "people" but their leaders are more cunning and SMARTER than the bozos who have been negotiating and dealing for America.
Those leaders have either ripped us off, and/or used us as a dumping ground for undesirables according to Trump- and I see no reason to disagree.

I guess you really believe Trump will trample on the Constitution and will be the first "President" in history without a cabinet, advisors including a couple of Constitutional Lawyers.
So be it. You're entitled to your opinion.

By the way, there's a very fair chance Trump won't get the necessary delegates, or Cruz beating him in the remaining primaries, or Trump being rejected at the Convention.

Don't panic, the Republic will stand. But I would be more concerned with a race baiting former incompetent lying Secretary of State who leans left and will continue to use the politics of division between races, rich and poor, male and female.
Click to expand...

Way TMI, and personal affronts.....

"thought provoking" (in another post-insight into character?).....
Disclaimer: for those "thinking" Don't hurt yourself....

"Thinking" - what a concept...
 
Mattingly23NY said:
Way TMI, and personal affronts.....

"thought provoking" (in another post-insight into character?).....
Disclaimer: for those "thinking" Don't hurt yourself....

"Thinking" - what a concept...
Click to expand...


I know nothing - teach me, I'm willing to learn.
 
Other than the fact that prior to 1950 the co2 measurements are estimated and its well understood that there is a natural saturation range for co2 in ice core samples that they just pinned to a global temp model? the so-called "settled science" isn't science. we still don't have any accurate methods to measure human activity impact on the planet. lets start there first. to the best approximation, green houses gases, ie. everything except nitrogen and oxygen have remained at a 3% level for the history of planet earth. i'm happy to discuss any theory that can account for that.
 
...CO2 levels were no more or no less "estimated" than the others...and why is CO2 your only barometer? I'll ask again, do you believe humans are having an adverse effect on the climate or not?...simple yes or no.


CO2_history_1024.jpg



...and can you provide something that actually DISPROVES the theory?...NASA and NOAA and others certainly disagree with you.
 
Last edited:
We never did science at ESPN. This place has really evolved.
 
Messiah717 said:
We never did science at ESPN. This place has really evolved.
Click to expand...

This could get to be a very broad issue, or debate, endless almost, due to thousands of variables, ..... I think this is where my bus stop is, (for the time being) after all, I'm retired, I'd love to engage in this; but- crunching numbers and formula's, was once second nature, today its an adventure....:cowboy::doh:

continue on my friends- :drumroll::blazerwookie:
 
...^^^ I'm from the Woodstock generation, so I tend to question most everything...and though I'm usually a skeptic, I'm not about humans having an adverse effect Mother Earth.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...^^^ I'm from the Woodstock generation, so I tend to question most everything...and though I'm usually a skeptic, I'm not about humans having an adverse effect Mother Earth.
Click to expand...

...^^^ In this day and age, skepticism an essential trait, for those who survive ...

Saw a documentary on Hendrix the other day, on Woodstock. How Jimi was paid approx., 4 times ($100,000.-), what any bands were paid . Being the headliner, he was scheduled initially (prior to delays), to close on the last night, around 10pm. Began his set moments before Sunrise; awakening 40-50,000 peeps, left in attendance, (out of 400,000+ at max peak in those 3 days), to the immortalized Star Spangled Banner.....perfect tune at sunrise...
 
^^^I remember playing the Woodstock album over and over and over...and when Hendrix's rendition of the star spangled banner was released to the air waves it cause quite a stir. But in the summer of '69 it was pure genius...a left handed guitarist playing a right handed guitar turned upside down.
 
The highlight for me at Woodstock was the late great Alvin Lee with Ten years after doing "I'm going home". One of the most amazing guitar solo's I ever heard.
 
The Great Alvin Lee! Ten Years After were a great band.
Couple of great albumns.
We lost Alvin Lee a couple of years ago.

Canned Heat put on a good show at Woodstock.
 
^^^^This is old news Ron, don't tell that someone is actually questioning this.:rolleyes2:
 
The Arrogant Pompous Prick vs the Bitch from Hell, whadda' country...

Sad to say, sad to see, sadder to know this is all real....
 
Also sad is that its inevitable that one of these two clowns will be our next president. GOD HELP US!
 
Rick2583 said:
Also sad is that its inevitable that one of these two clowns will be our next president. GOD HELP US!
Click to expand...
Not so fast Rick. We're in the bottom of the 5th....

While Hillbilly will likely lead going into the DEM convention, there is still the investigation looming.
On the GOP side, after Utah clobbering the Donald needs to sweep CA....that ain't gonna happen as its 54 discrete races. So then people say that with a plurality, the nod has to go to Trump. Well that assumes (1) all his pledged delegates are valid and (2) the valid ones cast a first BALLOT for him. You see, the GOP primary rules allow for challenging winner take all awards. Usually these are resolved by reapportionment. Then we have the final voting by the delegates....they really can do what they want as a state contingent and as individuals. Primary popular voting is not binding, and where it is binding for select States on 1st BALLOT...there areno penalties. The convention will look at Donald's negatives, his polling vs Hillbilly and he will be toast. GOP will go with the potential for riots now rather than the civil war if they let Trump hand the white house and Congress to the DEMs.
 
WOW!, It wasnt't me, And I don't think it was Vic or Tom, or Rob or Michael or Steve or Lillie, Damn.......I'm stumped.
 
lol, I'm a bit surprised reading all of the chest beating about polls concerning an election which is seven months away.
Anyone else find this just a teeny weeny premature before placing your bets on the table?

Here, try this one--> according to exit polls (FROM ACTUAL ELECTIONS, lol) , two thirds of ALL Republican voters from super Tuesday favor a ban on Muslim immigration.
Once again Trump scored with the people on a "controversial" issue which he was brave enough to address ....and SMART ENOUGH to know.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/03...support-temporarily-banning-muslims-from-u-s/


By the way, he was also right on target when he commented on Brussels BEFORE the horrible 3/22/16 attack.

http://www.allenbwest.com/2016/03/flashback-trump-made-chilling-prediction-about-brussels/


http://theconservativetreehouse.com...belgium-the-new-york-times-mocked-him-for-it/
 
Last edited:
Here, try this one--> according to exit polls (FROM ACTUAL ELECTIONS, lol) , two thirds of ALL Republican voters from super Tuesday favor a ban on Muslim immigration.
Once again Trump scored with the people on a "controversial" issue which he was brave enough to address ....and SMART ENOUGH to know.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/03...support-temporarily-banning-muslims-from-u-s/


By the way, he was also right on target when he commented on Brussels BEFORE the horrible 3/22/16 attack.

http://www.allenbwest.com/2016/03/flashback-trump-made-chilling-prediction-about-brussels/


http://theconservativetreehouse.com...belgium-the-new-york-times-mocked-him-for-it/


How many times does he have to say:
"I haven't begun on Hillary yet".

Sure, Hillary could clobber him in the general election (if Trump IS the GOP Nominee) .....but I also have a feeling Trump is quite capable of tearing her down in the months leading up to the election.


Excuse me, sorry for the duplication....oops.

But I hope it is read at least once.
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
If a picture is worth a 1,000 words, then this could easily become "War and Peace", or "The Brothers Karamazov"....

YYY.jpg



YYYY.png



YYYYY.jpg


YYYYYYY.jpg



yyy2.jpg
 
and one for the bitch, who want's to be Queen, "Queen Bitch"....

YYYYYYYYYYY.jpg

A MESSAGE FROM THE QUEEN

As you know, my dear people, the last year for me has been an annus horribilus. The Royal House of Clinton has been tormented by questions about our handling of finances and subjected to tiresome questions about the tragic events in Benghazi - in the furthest regions of our empire. And, sadly, also questions about my Royal e-mails.

Nevertheless, I will not be daunted in my desire and commitment to serve you, the people. For the next seventeen months I will be traveling among you as one of you, to listen to your deepest longings and needs. I will be with you in your Wal-Marts and beside you in your Burger Kings. I will drive with you down the busy interstate highways of our land, sharing your poverty and needs.

How well I remember the days when the Duke of Arkansas and I were impoverished. After we were expelled from our Washington Palace we hardly had two mansions to rub together. We were so poor that we removed thousands of dollars of china, flatware, carpets and gifts from the Washington Palace just to survive. Shockingly, unscrupulous and ungrateful officials later forced us to return many of these treasures. Now, happily, benefactors from around our empire have given me just enough for us to scrape by.

During these difficult times, we had to cut back. When our daughter was married, we only had three million dollars to spend on her wedding. And, I remember our hopes, as she moved into her $10 million Manhattan apartment, that one day she would be able to move on from that humble abode to something more fitting. After working for MSNBC for a starting salary of a mere $600,000 per year, what else could she do? So I now pay her $3,000,000 a year to run the 'Foundation'.

So, as I travel across our kingdom to meet you all, I will be listening and sharing with you. Then, when the time for the royal election (Coronation) comes, I know I can count on you to crown me as your rightful monarch, with my assurance that I will continue King Obama’s policies, and we can all live happily ever after.

Your Queen-in-Waiting,
Hilarity Rodham Clinton
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top