And when exactly was that? When they allowed blacks? gays? women? Or are you meaning something else by social engineering?
1) Openly gay without regard for sex, but gender.
2) Openly transgender without regard for
3) Training on things that are not "general military" requirements.
I'm all for anyone who can do the job doing the job. A woman makes it through Ranger school? Fantastic, good for her, I probably couldn't right now after 2 tours overseas. REducing requirements and standards to
ensure a woman passes? Unsatisfactory social engineering bullshit (and since SECDEF has said so, I can say so.

)
Putting women onboard submarines is another example. I understand the logic behind "it just takes brains to be a nuclear engineer, doesn't matter if they have a Y chromosome or not". But the concept is flawed at the societal level. If it doesn't matter, why are there separate bathrooms for women and men? If it does matter, why are there no issues with gay personnel conducting their bathroom business with members of the gender they're sexually attracted to? If you're going to segregate, why is it that there is one bathroom for 150 men onboard the ship, but one for the 9 women? It's
much easier for officers, who have tighter quarters and (presumably) more education and self-control and leadership, but there have still been problems with that as well, that I don't want to go into, but you can probably google. The British Navy just had to transfer crews off their nuclear ballistic subs b/c of a sex scandal with the CO, XO and other officers...which wouldn't be a scandal at any other job I've worked at.
This is literally the Fiscal Year 18 General Military Training list. I (and everyone in the Navy) must complete these or be separated from the Navy. Tell me which of these stop sailors from being killed when running into another ship:
(1) Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Awareness (F2F)*
(2) Equal Opportunity/Sexual Harassment/Grievance Procedures (F2F)
(3) Suicide Prevention (F2F)
(4) Antiterrorism Level 1 Awareness (F2F/computer-based)
Course number: CENSECFOR-AT-010-1.0
(5) Counterintelligence Awareness and Reporting (NCIS/computer-based)
Course number: DOD-CIAR-1.0
(6) Combating Trafficking in Persons (F2F/computer-based)
Course number: DOD-CTIP-2.0
(7) Cyber Awareness Challenge (computer-based only)
Course number: DOD-IAA-V14.0
(8) Operations Security (F2F/computer-based/mobile)
Course number: NIOC-USOPSEC-2.0
(9) DON Annual Privacy Training (F2F/computer-based/mobile)
Course number: DOD-PRIV-1.0
(10) Records Management (F2F/computer-based/mobile)
Course number: DOR-RM-010-1.2
Additionally, we completed Transgender Awareness Training earlier this year as a stand-down, do not conduct any operations until it's finished course. Which I actually learned a lot from and was glad for, but it has since probably been overcome by policy.
Tell me which of those are "warfighting" courses, which are "cover the military's ass" courses, and which are "touchy-feely" courses.
Yes, I'm sure the potential recruits of today are deeply concerned about what John Kerry might have said.
Barfo, do you know/understand/care how a huge number of today's military are a) deeply conservative, b) 2nd-or-more-generation military, and c) distrustful of those who are getting "entitlements" while their benefits are at risk of being cut. It's not just Kerry. Bring up Obama, Gore, Clinton and, better or worse, whether you understand it or not,
Trump, one of the least conservtive and (frankly) underqualified candidates ever to run on the R ticket, won 3-to-1 over Clinton.
Since you made that choice, presumably you know the answer?
barfo
Nope. In before Obama/Hagel/Mabus, still (grace of God) standing after. I've already done the hardest things I'll ever do in the military, knock on wood. But asking 18y/o's to sign up for this? Already, only 17% or so of the military-age range qualify physically to even attempt to enlist (before academic testing, non-felonies, drug use, security clearances, etc). When the best and most fit of America decides they'd rather not (and the numbers are going down, even though the PResident wants much higher force levels), where does that leave the other 99.5% of society that is NOT serving in the military?