magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
This veteran study had peer reviewed resistance. 1.) they didn’t show the actual treatment dosage. 2.) They were on patients that we severely ill and 3.) the tables provided had major questions.Malaria drug touted by Trump for coronavirus fails another test
"We didn't see any association between getting this medicine and the chance of dying or being intubated," lead researcher Dr. Neil Schluger told Reuters in a telephone interview. "The patients who got the drug didn't seem to do any better."
Among patients given hydroxychloroquine, 32.3% ended up needing a ventilator or dying, compared with 14.9% of patients who were not given the drug.
But doctors were more likely to give hydroxychloroquine to sicker patients, so researchers at New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University Irving Medical Center adjusted the rates to account for that. They concluded that the drug may not have hurt patients, but it clearly did not help.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/m...or-coronavirus-fails-another-test/ar-BB13KQ4Z
I think this was shared already btw