perhaps because we seem to live in a time that the truth matters not and the administration has a track record of non factual/alternative truths, and that this could persuade some to believe they should follow the example of the most influential newsmaker of both broadcast and social media sources ?? data says he promotes a treatment that has not proven to be effective and carries significant risks.All hate and politics aside, if the letter is genuine then why look for technicalities? Reminds me of when buds of mine would get a speeding ticket and they would declare a bunch of technicalities on the tickey.
Geez....
edit i would like to note that after one of the said newsmakers press conferences touting another potential treatment, the director of the NIAID felt compelled to make the statement to please not drink bleach??
Last edited: